General Election 2017 | Cabinet reshuffle: Hunt re-appointed Health Secretary for record third time
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
BBC said:
If she's genuinely ill, they're going to look like absolute cnuts for that comment.
Dianne Abbott should be on Loose Women, not a MP. Completely out of her depth, illness or no illness in all fairness.
I mean, she was on sky news yesterday or the day before and asked around 10 times if Corbyn was going to replace her.
What's new... just surprised they haven't called for her to face a fit-for-work assessment.
Has she got a sick note from the GP? I wonder if they've charged her.
Seems both her and Corbyn have been offered jobs by the National Lottery as Celebrity Random Number Generators.....
I've only been living in the UK for eight months but it's so abundantly clear, for the future of young people, that another Conservative government will be a disaster. I have a good feeling about Labour though. This whole election is quite reminiscent of the Marriage Equality referendum in Ireland last year. I'm expecting record numbers of young voters to turn out tomorrow and give everyone quite a shock.
Maybe Hammond, Gove and Mitchell could join them?
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-philip-hammond-skewered-bbc-10438641
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/new...rvative-andrew-mitchell-gets-minimum-13145376
http://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/michael-gove-numbers-hopelessly-wrong/
At least Hammond and Gove were in the right order of magnitude. Mitchell was awful though, no excuse for not knowing what minimum wage is.
Sorry, but this is a crock of shit.
It's almost laughably bad in how it presumes the young are ignorant and dumb, yet if you're old you're automatically wise because you've been 'around the block', as if the two are mutually exclusive.
What a load of twaddle that disguises itself in a clever & articulate think piece.
I know the caf is a pretty left leaning place, but I've just looked at the results of the poll and I'm surprised.
Almost 60% voting Labour. How are the general polls looking?
I think Corbyn would be great, but then I am on the outside looking in. I know his numbers are on the rise, but that's not hard considering he was basically a no hoper at the start of the campaign.
Have Labour a chance?
Almost 60% voting Labour. How are the general polls looking?
I think Corbyn would be great, but then I am on the outside looking in. I know his numbers are on the rise, but that's not hard considering he was basically a no hoper at the start of the campaign.
Have Labour a chance?
Heathrow flooded tomorrow with loads of young people coming home to vote
Haha nah that only happens in Ireland 'cause we don't have a postal vote or proxy vote.
No they don't really, must polls think they will lose by around 7-9%. No forecasts are giving them the most seats, one predicts a hung parliament which is the best we can hope for.
That's the dream.
Youth vote across the UK is similar. 70% of those aged 18-24 are planning to vote labour
http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.ne...f3ruqo8k0q/SundayTimesResults_170602_VI_W.pdf
Problem is those aged 64+ are voting 3:1 Tory to Labour. And we have an aging population. And old people are more likely to vote.
So no. Labour don't have a chance.
Spot on.
You need a good heat wave. Get rid of a few of them.
Ridiculous joke of an article, but the comments over there are even worse.
That's ageist....
Was a bit like Brexit. The old dinosaurs destroying the country for the youth. But hey, that's another story for another day.
So is that....
It is rather odd that those three in particular get away with such little criticism, given the obsession with accuracy Diane Abbott's critics have isn't it?
Problem was, Diane Abbott's was a car crash. She got it wrong again, and again, and again, and again. She was orders of magnitude out. And she kept changing her figures. And then saying she hadn't said them.
Gove just didn't know the £1000/£2000 figure. He was called out in it, but it still wasn't that bad, he was in the right ball park (a bit cringey though)
Hammond said 32 instead of 52.
Mitchell's was awful, but he isn't in the cabinet.
Diane Abbott was 'orders of magnitude out'. Hammond was just the £20BILLION off.
Do you know what an order of magnitude is?
A pretty crap excuse by the looks of it.
ChristFair point.....
But in her case, it's been pretty obvious for years that even if she is a good local, constituency MP, she couldn't run a whelk stall let alone a Government Ministry.
Feck off back to Ireland.
Yeah. It isn't as if Hammond is Chancellor of the Exchequer having previously been Secretary of State for Transport so he'd have no reason not to know the cost of the country's biggest transport project.
I might have to if yer wan continues with her 'no deal is better than a bad deal' bollox.
There really aren't any excuses for the imbalance of reporting on mistakes between Labour and the Tories. None
Let's say you get 3 people in a room, and gave them all a quiz question.
Question: How many Litres does this tank hold
It's a hard question. The human brain does not deal with large numbers well at all, and the cylindrical shape makes things more difficult. There is also little sense of scale. Still nonetheless, everyone gives it their best shot.
Person 1 goes first. He has no idea what a litre is, so says 100 litres. Everyone else laughs.
Person 2 goes next. He thinks about it for a long time and then says 1 million litres. Person 1 goes a bit pale in the face.
Person 3 divides the two and says 500,000 litres, confident that Person 1 was over, but not way over.
The quiz master reveals the answer; 100,000 litres.
Everyone stops to think for a second before realising that Person 1 has won. He's only 99,900 litres out. Person 3 is next closest being 400,000 litres out.
But if you stop to think about it, it's obvious that Person 2 and Person 3 were a lot closer intellectually than Person 1. Person 1 had no concept of what a Litre even was.
There are two ways to deal with this; percentages and orders of magnitude.
As a percentage, Person 1 was 99.9% out. Person 3 was 80% out. But Person 1 argues Person 3 wasn't 80% out, but 400% out.
The better way to deal with this is with orders of magnitude. Person 1 was 3 orders of magnitude out, Person 3 less than one order of magnitude out (0.69)
None of this has anything to do with the General Election, other than to say, Diane Abbott's an idiot. I try to defend her, we all have off days, (Barack Obama said he was a Muslim when he had a cold). But there is a non insignificant difference in saying something costs 50000 times less than it will do, and getting a single digit wrong.
Last edited:
No they weren't, Person 1 was closer than either of them. The question didn't ask for an explanation of what a litre was, it asked for the volume of the tank. It might be the result of blind luck, but it doesn't invalidate Person 1's answer being closest.
I'd also call this a good example of the importance of humility. Person 2 and 3 believed their understanding of what a litre and volume were was considerably more accurate than Person 1. It turns out they were extremely mistaken. If 100 litres seems like a ridiculous answer when the tank holds 100,000 litres, then guessing 400,000 litres more (or indeed 900,000) shows that they also don't know what a litre is, and more so than Person 1.
I would describe 'orders of magnitude' as predicting the new policing costs at £300,000 when she meant £300,000,000. Now it's one thing quickly correcting yourself and saying 'sorry I meant millions'. It's a totally different thing genuinely not having a clue and going for interim guess figure of £80,000,000. She's an embarrassment to the party. It's really not too much to ask for politicians just to do a tiny bit of homework and have their figures at least in the ball park. Her interview with Murnaghan was some of the cringiest television I have ever seen. There is absolutely no political world in which she should be playing a part.
I agree that there is a Tory bias within the media however I also think that Labour voters would be quite happy to see it the other way around. At the next election (assuming May, if elected makes a hash of her term) if the media back Labour the same people complaining now will be celebrating.
I will be voting Conservative because I still believe the biggest issues facing this country can be traced back to a Labour government and I don't see why they should be given the chance to fix their feck-ups.
I agree that there is a Tory bias within the media however I also think that Labour voters would be quite happy to see it the other way around. At the next election (assuming May, if elected makes a hash of her term) if the media back Labour the same people complaining now will be celebrating.
I will be voting Conservative because I still believe the biggest issues facing this country can be traced back to a Labour government and I don't see why they should be given the chance to fix their feck-ups.
Let's say you get 3 people in a room, and gave them all a quiz question.
Question: How many Litres does this tank hold
It's a hard question. The human brain does not deal with large numbers well at all, and the cylindrical shape makes things more difficult. There is also little sense of scale. Still nonetheless, everyone gives it their best shot.
Person 1 goes first. He has no idea what a litre is, so says 100 litres. Everyone else laughs.
Person 2 goes next. He thinks about it for a long time and then says 1 million litres. Person 1 goes a bit pale in the face.
Person 3 divides the two and says 500,000 litres, confident that Person 1 was over, but not way over.
The quiz master reveals the answer; 100,000 litres.
Everyone stops to think for a second before releasing that Person 1 has won. He's only 99,900 litres out. Person 3 is next closest being 400,000 litres out.
But if you stop to think about it, it's obvious that Person 2 and Person 3 were a lot closer than Person 1. Person 1 had no concept of what a Litre even was.
There are two ways to deal with this; percentages and orders of magnitude.
As a percentage, Person 1 was 99.9% out. Person 3 was 80% out. But Person 1 argues Person 3 wasn't 80% out, but 400% out.
The better way to deal with this is with orders of magnitude. Person 1 was 3 orders of magnitude out, Person 3 less than one order of magnitude out (0.69)
None of this has anything to do with the General Election, other than to say, Diane Abbott's an idiot. I try to defend her, we all have off days, (Barack Obama said he was a Muslim when he had a cold). But there is a non insignificant difference in saying something costs 50000 times less than it will do, and getting a single digit wrong.
Person 1 is also right because there ain't no way you're getting that tank to hold 500,000 or a million litres. You're going to end up looking stupid even trying to get that much in. And proper wet too, probably.
Diane Abbott's an idiot.
She's also a bit of a liar as well - only 'ill' when it suits her.
Remember when she ' had a migraine ' during the BREXIT vote, but was seen drinking in the Commons Bar ?
And the other day, 'too ill' to appear on a radio programme but was photographed in an underground station less than five minutes walk from the studio ?
Only on the Opposition Front Bench because she was Crobyn's bed partner in their youth and he owes her.