Bluemoon goes into Meltdown

Raggy Alves.
 
Pep Sodding Guardiola.
 
Now it seems Alves was getting married yesterday in Ibiza when he was supposed to be taking calls from PSG.

Transfers are boring.
 
Last edited:
Raggy Alves.

shaggy-scooby-doo2.png
 
On Alves:
Bluemoon said:
Painfully obvious the new Mrs alves has tugged him in the wrong direction so she can ponse around in gay Paris!! :(
Bluemoon said:
Told you he was a snidey little shithouse that Bruno marrs lookalike.
Bluemoon said:
Thus will be down to playing time.

At PSG he will be first choice, at City he won't.

To be fair a few of them still seem hopeful about it though. Page number grew by three by the time I had finished reading one, probably because it's about 10 posts per page.
 
Last edited:
Has anyone gone over there lately? Even by BlueMoon standards it really is mind-boggling at the moment

They are well and truly, 100% fixated on us. We seem to occupy their every waking (and probably unwaking) thought.

They also seem really confused about why few people have a major problem with us spending £100m on a player but do have a problem with the footballing nobodies who won the lottery doing it - I am referring here to their constant bleating about how we have been accused of "ruining football/inflating transfer fees....blah blah blah" with the Lukaku deal
 
On hearing the news about Alves, somewhere in North London Daniel Levy adds another £10 million to Walker's price.
 
They're pathetic, they seem to think we've been snubbed by players when the ones we've had offers accepted for have come to us.
 
On hearing the news about Alves, somewhere in North London Daniel Levy adds another £10 million to Walker's price.
I really hope not, i don't want them targeting semedo because walker is too costly.
 
Honestly I had no idea, looked it up and it seems to have origins from when the professional dry-cleaning business came about

I also have no idea but I do use the phrase. I reckon it was from medieval times and it involved peasants being stripped of all their clothing before being hosed down. So 'taken to the cleaners' involves a loss of all your possessions in order to achieve cleanliness.

I don't think Walker is worth the effort.
 
I also have no idea but I do use the phrase. I reckon it was from medieval times and it involved peasants being stripped of all their clothing before being hosed down. So 'taken to the cleaners' involves a loss of all your possessions in order to achieve cleanliness.

I don't think Walker is worth the effort.
Any chance of Maffeo getting serious game time? He's looked decent the few times I've see him
 
Honestly I had no idea, looked it up and it seems to have origins from when the professional dry-cleaning business came about
I also have no idea but I do use the phrase. I reckon it was from medieval times and it involved peasants being stripped of all their clothing before being hosed down. So 'taken to the cleaners' involves a loss of all your possessions in order to achieve cleanliness.

I don't think Walker is worth the effort.
Thanks you both!
 
Any chance of Maffeo getting serious game time? He's looked decent the few times I've see him

I agree and I really hope so. However, the rumours are another loan to Girona. Perhaps the Alves situation might change matters, I don't see what City have to lose but we shall see.
 
Despite the certainty you convey, the two things are different.
Cleaned out is to be stripped of assets.
Taken to the cleaners is to be taken advantage of.

I don't want to take this thread off topic but would just say that it wasn't to come across as this is it and I am right, more a case of I believe that it is an evolution of the phrase cleaned out. However if this is wrong then I stand corrected
 
Has anyone gone over there lately? Even by BlueMoon standards it really is mind-boggling at the moment

They are well and truly, 100% fixated on us. We seem to occupy their every waking (and probably unwaking) thought.

They also seem really confused about why few people have a major problem with us spending £100m on a player but do have a problem with the footballing nobodies who won the lottery doing it - I am referring here to their constant bleating about how we have been accused of "ruining football/inflating transfer fees....blah blah blah" with the Lukaku deal

I guess that is what 125 years of local rivalry does for your Manchester fan-base. Lingard seems to understand, never mind Manchester solidarity in the face of terrorism lets tell half the city to 'go home'.
 
I don't want to take this thread off topic but would just say that it wasn't to come across as this is it and I am right, more a case of I believe that it is an evolution of the phrase cleaned out. However if this is wrong then I stand corrected
I'm not certain either. I just think what you put was two different conditions/idioms. No emotions involved.
Sorry if I came across that way.
 
I guess that is what 125 years of local rivalry does for your Manchester fan-base. Lingard seems to understand, never mind Manchester solidarity in the face of terrorism lets tell half the city to 'go home'.
Steady on mate, it's a third at best.
 
What happened to the Pep pull factor? A bit embarrassing when 1 of your former protege's tell you to do 1.

On BM they are putting a ''we refused to meet his wage demands'' spin on it, yeah right. The biggest payers in world football refused to stump up an extra few grand to secure a player they desperately wanted.
 
that wage talk is bullshit anyway. as i said in another thread psg’s current squad average wage is €131k. they only have 2 players around 200k afaik. and we are also talking about euros here
 
that wage talk is bullshit anyway. as i said in another thread psg’s current squad average wage is €131k. they only have 2 players around 200k afaik. and we are also talking about euros here

That has to be after tax. Can't believe nobody gets 200k and still people like Di Maria wants to join them for money.