NoLogo
Full Member
By making an attacking sub? Ok.
He subbed striker for striker, means he is happy with the state of our play and just hopes the other striker has a moment of brilliance the first one didn't have so far.
By making an attacking sub? Ok.
It's 3-4-1-2, no central midfield three.
Ah feck off ref! Compare that with Allis dive!
It's gone up again.I would have taken Lukaku off. He's been awful, generally, playing with a heavy touch.. you saw it for that chance that took him out too wide. He's a £90m forward ffs. Rashford has been our brightest spark attacking wise. Again, I would have left him on, with Martial (let's see what he does..) and Lindgaard.
Our attacking players have been really poor. Liverpool. Benfica. Huddersfield. Now here for 70mins. And this hasn't been Spurs anywhere close to their best. No Harry Kane.
Actually it proves my point as I clearly stated we would be a far more potent attacking threat with his presence in the lineup and to a lesser extent Fellaini.
Sure. Lets just keep ignoring the problem.
our strikers look totally isolated and have done for a few games now.
Alli is horrible isn't he, proper wannabe hard man from the Jack Wilshere school.No yellow for Alli but yellow for Tony.
United will benefit if Lingard does well toEnough of fanboy shit. I love him but I want him to do well cuz that means United will benefit.
rashford was the one guy who might have unlocked them with his pace. martial should have been on for lukaku
How the feck is that a yellow?
Because Pogba has been injured for 6 weeks!
Valencia didn't dive. Replay you can see his foot gets touched and he kinda trips himself for it. But it was a touch that caused him to go down.booked for diving correct , now ref what about Alli !!
Wow, didn’t know Eriksen was 25, genuinely though he was 28 more or less
Jonathan Moss