FCBarca
Mes que un Rag
Should introduce youth players instead of throwing money at the problem at every opportunity.
There's no goalscorer, central defender or LB ready for that jump
Should introduce youth players instead of throwing money at the problem at every opportunity.
To be fair, five minutes added on was right last night. I just wish the officials were more consistent with the time added on because there's been other games where there's been as many stoppages and time wasting as the game last night and that game only got like three or four minutes.Guessing this how everyone felt when Stevie Bruce got those two goals against Sheffield Wednesday. seriously though, how much injury time have City been given this season?
That's true. They seem tired and they don't finish their chances so easily. De Bruyne looks off, Aguero doesn't look very sharp either. Contrary to what some people think, in every system a team's most important players are always key to the overall performance. No tactics are ever successful without other parameters being at a very high level. And some parameters that contributed to clearer wins from City a while ago aren't at the required level for them in this moment. Plainly put, I think they're a bit tired and not as focused.Yes. They are relentless and keep on attacking the opposition which makes them buckle under the pressure. It's not a surprise, exact same thing happened under Fergie.
I'm clutching at straws, but their overall level of performance seems to be going down which is pleasing.
Didn't United also have a couple of games in hand when Newcastle was 12 points clear in 96?
Used to know a site that did historical week by week tables but can't find it.
This is a forum with I am guessing over 100,000 users, ofcourse some people will brag but you can't isolate that and consider it an overwhelming trait. Most people consider size of our fanbase important to our noodle and fidget spinner sponsorships. And also to try to match Sheikh's financial might.Give over mate. I've seen people on here openly bragging that United have way more fans in some remote town or city than City, or any other club for that matter. I think you were missing my point anyway - despite what you say, it is important to City that they build up that global fanbase. It's just that it's not something I'm ever going to cream my pants about.
The key difference to Chelsea is that Chelsea owner had limited money, while the Man City owners family are trillionaires themselves and are backed by the state of Abu Dhabi as well. So City have unlimited supply of money pouring in. That will ensure their dominance and growth of fan base globally. Children don't care where the money comes from, they care about winning.
They bought Guardiola's brother a club to ensure Guardiola stays with city long term. Guardiola won't leave when he knows he has a chance of becoming a billionaire at City. Chelsea now is a self sustaining club and that is why they blow hot and cold. City are a state funded club with infinite resources and will continue to spend. There is not that much comparison.
statto.com but it seems to have been down for a few months now, it was very handy
Bournemouth and yesterday. Always Sterling.Am i right thinking they have already won 6 points due to goals scored in injury time?
Bournemouth and yesterday. Always Sterling.
Hehehe. <3Just a small heads up, we're experiencing a lot of City fans sign up. If you want to be like this poster:
then you'll be banned without a warning.
Be like @M18CTID or @robinamicrowave.
The Premier League site has a handy feature now.Didn't United also have a couple of games in hand when Newcastle was 12 points clear in 96?
Used to know a site that did historical week by week tables but can't find it.
This is a forum with I am guessing over 100,000 users, ofcourse some people will brag but you can't isolate that and consider it an overwhelming trait. Most people consider size of our fanbase important to our noodle and fidget spinner sponsorships. And also to try to match Sheikh's financial might.
You will be increasing that fanbase exponentially if Guardiola sticks around. As a first a lot of Barca fans will defect to City. I Jest.
Yes. They are relentless and keep on attacking the opposition which makes them buckle under the pressure. It's not a surprise, exact same thing happened under Fergie.
I'm clutching at straws, but their overall level of performance seems to be going down which is pleasing.
Time wasting the whole second half??? Now I look at this sort of comment and really have to wonder whether City fans know anything at all about football. Why would we be wasting time the whole second half when we had gone behind after 77 seconds?? That's just asinine. Sure, we slowed it down. Sure, we were defensive and tried to hit on the break.
City supporters and the manager are just being idiotic in whinging that they were not allowed to play their expansive football and smash in a 5-0 result. Well feck me, I'm so sorry that some clubs have the temerity to try and counter that and not go toe to toe. Maybe if we had lots of players that cost £50m or were being paid £150k+ a week we might have been able to be more expansive, but fella, you need to take your head out of your arse and see what the Premier League is. Them and us. You are part of them and over the past 5 years have spent £600m net. Us lot cut our teeth more prosaically That you seem to be criticising us for playing to our strengths rather than yours shows how detached you really are from football.
Fair enough and you're right - it represents a very small percentage of the membership on this forum. When I come to think of it, and putting it in perspective, a larger number of United fans on here have been perhaps a bit too gushing in their praise of City's football this season.
You actually started time wasting in the first ten minutes of the game. Ive no problem whatsoever how teams want to set up or tactics they use. But don't kid yourselves that you wernt timewasting.Time wasting the whole second half??? Now I look at this sort of comment and really have to wonder whether City fans know anything at all about football. Why would we be wasting time the whole second half when we had gone behind after 77 seconds?? That's just asinine. Sure, we slowed it down. Sure, we were defensive and tried to hit on the break.
City supporters and the manager are just being idiotic in whinging that they were not allowed to play their expansive football and smash in a 5-0 result. Well feck me, I'm so sorry that some clubs have the temerity to try and counter that and not go toe to toe. Maybe if we had lots of players that cost £50m or were being paid £150k+ a week we might have been able to be more expansive, but fella, you need to take your head out of your arse and see what the Premier League is. Them and us. You are part of them and over the past 5 years have spent £600m net. Us lot cut our teeth more prosaically That you seem to be criticising us for playing to our strengths rather than yours shows how detached you really are from football.
Provided their current success has longevity and legs, which is not as foregone a conclusion as many make. Again I think Chelsea are a good example.
What we're seeing with grinding out results at the last minutes of games is a direct result of having quality players across the team/squad. Top quality players can and will always have an influence to change the game in a matter of seconds by themselves when the team as a whole is not getting their way. It could be seconds in the 95th minute or during any minute of the game...
I think City has a good core set of players now to be competitive for a good number of years to come. They don't have to worry too much about players moving on as long as they can pay them well, can continue to attract other top quality players, and win silverware. They have been able to do the first two, winning silverware under pep i'm sure will come at some point whether it is this season or not. They are not stopping at buying quality players either.
Pep has the tendency to get burned out quickly with any job he takes on because he goes at it with such intensity from the beginning. He's not entirely stable mentally to deal with the pressure either. So, that is a huge factor with sustainability of his teams' successes.
Ok, but not really last minutes.And yeah and Huddersfield (?) was 84th minute.
Based on nothing more than a wild assumption, I'd go as far as saying that a great many of those "United fans" are actually City/Liverpool fans in disguise.
Signing of the season.David Silva has renewed until 2020.
https://www.mancity.com/news/first-...ember/man-city-david-silva-contract-extension
Fergie time. Yeah, it is a thing.
Winning by any means necessary - i.e Playing ugly, grinding out results and playing to the final whistle fully intent on grabbing the winner - is a philosophy that all the top teams adhere to. SAF began indoctrinating that belief in to our club the very moment he arrived, it eventually became the underlying factor to our success. That never say die attitude was imbedded in to every player who wore the shirt and I feel it is something our current team sorely lack, although I'm hoping Jose can change that long term.
We're now seeing this very same thing with City, everytime they score a late goal I can't help but think of Fergie time.
There is something called FFP and don't forget PSG are on the same terms as CITYwhen it comes to money,Those two players chose Paris over Manchester for obvious reasons that the city is better to live in + the tax free income. Sanchez wanted to leave but Arsenal did not allow him to and to be frank i am not sure why Van djik wasn't signed.It is a fact that other big European clubs cannot match the wealth of The Arabs run clubs like PSG and Man city.If there really were infinite resources then City would've just paid the money for Van Dijk and Sanchez in the summer, probably would've been in for Mbappe and Neymar too if money is no object.
Obviously both. It's not one thing explaining their performances but a sum of several elements.Does City buy better players or has Pep made them better?
Signing of the season.
Great news for City although can't be a surprise and should help the transition for Pep to find a young dribbling midfielder to occupy that space right around the box
He's a great player, hard to think of him in any context other than with Valencia, he was sublime there but clearly a City legend in the making. He's 32 and still looks so dangerous on the ball but we may see some slow down over the next couple of years as father time catches up to all of us
Alternatively City and Pep could try something really unique and different, like say promoting and giving chances to Phil Foden, or anyone from their academy at all.
(No point in mentioning his Barca team, that was a unique crop of academy players like our class of 92', everyone would have promoted them)
Does City buy better players or has Pep made them better?
They have looked great so far, but I am just thankful the sheikhs didn't buy Liverpool. I'd probably give up on football altogether if the City project was with Liverpool FC. The thought of Liverpool domination makes me sick.
I find it hard to hate anything about City - except laughing at their empty seats. I was a huge Pep fan at Barca and I like most of their players - too much class there.
Does City buy better players or has Pep made them better?
Think Bernardo will slowly replace him in the next 2 years. That's surely the plan.Signing of the season.