fergieisold
New Member
People are allowed to be offended, but they have no right to try and change peoples behaviour or make others feel bad when they've done nothing wrong and meant no harm.
People are allowed to be offended, but they have no right to try and change peoples behaviour or make others feel bad when they've done nothing wrong and meant no harm.
People are allowed to be offended, but they have no right to try and change peoples behaviour or make others feel bad when they've done nothing wrong and meant no harm.
FFSI think fancy dress is all about getting in character. If that character is typically a different colour I can't see how it's a problem.
If a black guy wanted to be Prince William I think he'd struggle to have the same effect without while makeup.
Is that offensive, hell no!
I get there is a history, etc, where this has been misused. But guns have killed people, does that make everyone in America a murderer. Penises have caused rape, does that make every man a rapist.
I know these things are not the same, but the point holds. Just because someone used something in a way that was negative does not mean someone else using that something is also using it in a negative way.
I think being overly sensitive to such things only increases the divide. Griezmann has a known public great relationship with Pogba. It's obvious he is both not racist and if anything appreciates black culture. Why can't he share that appreciation in his own way.
I think it's actually racist to suggest otherwise.
In his head I don't think he felt he was doing anything wrong.Are you saying that Griezmann did nothing wrong?
In his head I don't think he felt he was doing anything wrong.
I dont believe it is racist. But I wouldnt do it, as I know it is something people have an issue with
Some of the snowflakes in this thread are cringeworthy. Context is everything and he's doing it as a tribute, give it a rest.
I think fancy dress is all about getting in character. If that character is typically a different colour I can't see how it's a problem.
If a black guy wanted to be Prince William I think he'd struggle to have the same effect without while makeup.
Is that offensive, hell no!
I get there is a history, etc, where this has been misused. But guns have killed people, does that make everyone in America a murderer. Penises have caused rape, does that make every man a rapist.
I know these things are not the same, but the point holds. Just because someone used something in a way that was negative does not mean someone else using that something is also using it in a negative way.
I think being overly sensitive to such things only increases the divide. Griezmann has a known public great relationship with Pogba. It's obvious he is both not racist and if anything appreciates black culture. Why can't he share that appreciation in his own way.
I think it's actually racist to suggest otherwise.
I found the picture to be funny, Maybe it's just me.
Are you saying that Griezmann did nothing wrong?
Penises have caused rape. That should ne his tagline.
Also that doesn't mean all penises are rapists.
Not at all. I'm saying that, regardless of his intentions, what he did carried with it a long history of discrimination. Whether he was aware of that fact or not is beside the point, and as such it is wrong to start questioning how offended people may be by what he did, or as some are doing, trying to dictate an appropriate degree to which people are entitled to feel offended.
He did nothing wrong. I am an African and I don’t feel offended by what Griezmann did. The only people who do already live a sad, uninteresting life anyway so anything ticks them off.
The Wayan brothers can do a movie about “White Girls” and paint themselves white, but Griezmann cannot do the same? The double standard is disgusting. I understand his apology because of the PR & stuff but in principle, he’s done nothing wrong.
The SJWs on social media can feck off
He did nothing wrong. I am an African and I don’t feel offended by what Griezmann did. The only people who do already live a sad, uninteresting life anyway so anything ticks them off.
The Wayan brothers can do a movie about “White Girls” and paint themselves white, but Griezmann cannot do the same? The double standard is disgusting. I understand his apology because of the PR & stuff but in principle, he’s done nothing wrong.
The SJWs on social media can feck off
It's already been explained to you and you still don't get it, do you? Which bit is hard to comprehend? (I'm being genuine here.)The historical context argument is a valid one, but this one isn't. Why do all of Donald Trump impersonators paint their faces orange? After all, wouldn't the fact that they are wearing his ridiculous hair and imitating his voice and gestures be enough to convincingly portray him? If a black guy (for some reason) wanted to dress up as Tom Hanks, don't you think he should be painting his face white? If I wanted to dress up as Denzel Washington, shouldn't I least make the effort to paint my face darker?
Sense spoken. You still won’t convince the average middle class white man not to be offended though.
After all, embracing the chance to mock, dehumanize, and to dismiss the feelings and demands of others, all while re-imagining history so that only things you deem wrong are wrong, is a pretty great way to perpetuate a racist society that treats black people like crap.
Finally, if you really cannot understand what's wrong with with blackface, challenge yourself to figure out what seems so right about it. Leonard suggests that blackface fans ask themselves, "Why do I derive pleasure from this? What's the investment in doing it, and what's the investment in defending it?"
Im sick of this lad seems like a bellend. Im glad he is afraid of the cold and rain.
Intentions are incredibly relevant and he's clearly dressing up for fun and as a tribute, which is why you see people jumping in to defend him.
Offense is subjective so it's entirely rationale for myself and others to point out how ridiculous some of the slander being thrown at him is for what is obviously an innocent gesture.
I'm Irish and I don't get offended or upset when someone dresses up as a british solider, or member of the royal family or anyone whose had a long history of discrimination against generations of Irish because I realise they have no intention what so ever to offend Irish people and just dress up for fun.
It doesn't matter what your intention is, when the thing you are doing is racist.Intentions are incredibly relevant and he's clearly dressing up for fun and as a tribute, which is why you see people jumping in to defend him.
It doesn't matter what your intention is, when the thing you are doing is racist.
It's far from nonsense actually. Some were trying to give Griezmann a pass because there was no intent to offend (or something similar). This doesn't matter when the act itself is racist (doesn't make him racist though). It's really not that hard to comprehend.This is nonsense. Of course intentions matter. There’s an ocean of difference between doing something racist for explicitly racist reasons and doing it accidentally out of ignorance. Just as there’s a difference between premeditated murder and involuntary manslaughter.
It's far from nonsense actually. Some were trying to give Griezmann a pass because there was no intent to offend (or something similar). This doesn't matter when the act itself is racist (doesn't make him racist though). It's really not that hard to comprehend.
I am an African who didn’t feel offended by what Griezmann did, however blackface is not acceptable and my personal attitude is not, and should not be, representative or indicative of what is acceptable in society.
Just like yours shouldn’t be.
You don’t care about it? Great.
Doesn’t make it a great idea.
Painting this as if SJW’s are what’s wrong is hugely ignorant.
As a wider point - if you as an individual don’t feel offence to something, it doesn’t mean that the action wasn’t offensive.
Not every black person will find this offensive, however that doesn’t mean that this is still a clever thing to do, does it?
Can we stop with the ‘I’m x and I don’t care about this particular issue’ argument? Nobody cares.
We’re not talking on an individual level.
So it’s perfectly fine for the Wayan brothers to do “White chicks” but a football player cannot dress up as a black man? Is that not reverse racism in itself?
Why can’t black people take what they constantly dish out? How is Griezmann disrespecting anyone by choosing to be a Harlem Globetrotter player? I think the world is a mess right now. Everyone has something to whine & moan about.
No black person, I repeat, no black person should be offended by what Antoine did. If they do, they should tell me what his offence is. What bollocks? Must we always be victims in everything? This is bordering on lunacy.
FFS
Please don't move or close this thread, I've gone from mildly agitated by all the ignorance to happy RedCafe is providing a platform for all the idiots on here to expose themselves.
What slander? Pretty much every single person criticising him on here has gone no further than saying it was stupid and ignorant, which it was.
Intention obviously has to be taken into account, which is precisely why people have gone no further than calling him stupid and ignorant. However, just because a person may not be racist does not mean that they cannot do or say racist things.
It doesn't matter what your intention is, when the thing you are doing is racist.
This is nonsense. Of course intentions matter. There’s an ocean of difference between doing something racist for explicitly racist reasons and doing it accidentally out of ignorance. Just as there’s a difference between premeditated murder and involuntary manslaughter, and any respectable justice system recognizes that difference.
It's far from nonsense actually. Some were trying to give Griezmann a pass because there was no intent to offend (or something similar). This doesn't matter when the act itself is racist (doesn't make him racist though). It's really not that hard to comprehend.
The idea that intentions don’t matter is absolutely, 100% nonsense, both legally and ethically.
Intentions obviously matter in some circumstances, but if I wear a swastika T-shirt cos I think it is a cool symbol and then wander into a Jewish neighbourhoood, I can't complain if people take offence.The idea that intentions don’t matter is absolutely, 100% nonsense, both legally and ethically.
Do me a favour and stfu with that bullshit....So it’s perfectly fine for the Wayan brothers to do “White chicks” but a football player cannot dress up as a black man? Is that not reverse racism in itself?
Why can’t black people take what they constantly dish out? How is Griezmann disrespecting anyone by choosing to be a Harlem Globetrotter player? I think the world is a mess right now. Everyone has something to whine & moan about.
No black person, I repeat, no black person should be offended by what Antoine did. If they do, they should tell me what his offence is. What bollocks? Must we always be victims in everything? This is bordering on lunacy.
No one is arguing intent doesn't matter though, we're just stressing that it doesn't magically inoculate people from responsibility for their actions or render them unaccountable from the effects of said actions. This shit doesn't exist in a vacuum and pretending it does, doesn't help anybody.The idea that intentions don’t matter is absolutely, 100% nonsense, both legally and ethically.
Intentions obviously matter in some circumstances, but if I wear a swastika T-shirt cos I think it is a cool symbol and then wander into a Jewish neighbourhoood, I can't complain if people take offence.
The idea that intentions don’t matter is absolutely, 100% nonsense, both legally and ethically.
If someone accidentally trips you in the street and immediately apologizes, do you treat that person as if he/she did it on purpose? Presumably you don’t.