Random Task
WW Lynchpin
I think Pep is speaking in relation to wages rather than direct transfer fees. City cannot afford to spend on wages what United can due to FFP.
One day it was widely reported to be 300k. The next day it was widely reported to be 400k. After that, it was widely reported to be 500k and we've even seen some reports of 600k pop up. I guess people will just accept whatever suits their agenda. Who needs facts anyway?£70m+ (plus).
Also widely reported that Sanchez is on something much steeper than £300k+. Besides, £300k is still a good £50k more than anything our highest paid player is on.
Just about sums it all up. Jose said the same thing, City fans take the piss on Bluemoon. Pep then does it, This time Utd fans take the piss. Just like the players wages, Both sets of fans seem to know exactly what the other sides players earn without having any idea whatsoever. You'll never ever take those Blue/Red tinted glasses off folk.City fans need to smarten up. Pep complaining about any kind of lack of financial support from the club is pathetic, just like it was for Jose to do so a month back (and many United fans here said as much).
I believe that City''s ancillary staff costs are paid by the parent company, so their player wages are likely higher than United's.What a load of horsecrap. Citys wage bill was reported to be around £240m, Uniteds is around £265m. The notion that City can't afford top wages is silly.
None of our fans believe it, we know Sanchez rejected them.I like how our fans believe everything they read.
They pay 60m for another CB but can't afford Sanchez, great stuff.![]()
None of our fans believe it, we know Sanchez rejected them.
None of our fans believe it, we know Sanchez rejected them.
I think Pep is speaking in relation to wages rather than direct transfer fees. City cannot afford to spend on wages what United can due to FFP.
That doesn't mean he believes City backed out because of wages though.....
That doesn't mean he believes City backed out because of wages though.
As a response to Sanchez rejecting them though, nobody with sense believes a word of it.Story about their wages started after the Sanchez deal.
....
We have a £70m player on 500k\week? That is news to me.
We do have a £89m player on 275k\week and a free transfer on 300k+\week wages though.
No, he's always dreamed of playing for United, that's why.DiMarzio reported Alexis was on 300k after tax so 550k before. The total deal value is 180million over the contract.
He came to United because of money, City wouldn't have had a problem matching 300k gross in 2018
I'll have what he's sniffing.DiMarzio reported Alexis was on 300k after tax so 550k before. The total deal value is 180million over the contract.
He came to United because of money, City wouldn't have had a problem matching 300k gross in 2018
DiMarzio reported Alexis was on 300k after tax so 550k before. The total deal value is 180million over the contract.
He came to United because of money, City wouldn't have had a problem matching 300k gross in 2018
DiMarzio reported Alexis was on 300k after tax so 550k before. The total deal value is 180million over the contract.
He came to United because of money, City wouldn't have had a problem matching 300k gross in 2018
You missed a bit.Clickbait headline where he says nothing of the sort in the actual article.
"I think it's a different thing now - you collect the top players in, if not the world, then Europe, mould them into a team.
"I think that's a different thing to some of the Man United teams of the past under Sir Alex which were moulded out of partly very good signings and partly players who have come through the system.
"It's a different kind of thought now. I think the demands of the Premier League are getting much, much higher.
"They're buying players fit for task, or virtually fit for task - that's the demands of the Premier League."
You missed a bit.
"I remember Pep himself when he was at Barcelona talking about why buy players when you can play young players, but even he now at Man City they're buying players, there are not many young players coming through the academy that they're playing.“
This is going to be an exhausting weekend for the City fans who defend everything Pep or their club do on here.
I appreciate rival fans adding another element to the forum but what does it really add when they take City's side no matter what?Luckily there's loads of City fans popping up on here now so they can all share the load.
I appreciate rival fans adding another element to the forum but what does it really add when they take City's side no matter what?
I'm expecting excuses about it being harder to break into Peps sides due to the high level of tactical knowledge it takes or the name Kimmich to be used time and time again.
To be honest, I want him to stay.Can’t wait for Pep to feck off to his next “challenge” at PSG or the next sugar daddy owned club.