The Active Shooter Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is an irony.........a lot of gun owners will not seek help for mental illness and depression because they are scared someone will take there guns away.
Yep. Gun culture is so ingrained in the US.
 
Here is an irony.........a lot of gun owners will not seek help for mental illness and depression because they are scared someone will take there guns away.
Its also cause they dont want to first admit they have a problem. Thats the problem with people who are mentally ill.
 
As long as Republicans and Trump take money from NRA .We'll be back here again
 


Fairly interesting thread - I do think there is something tied to toxic masculinity in this, and the fact that these incidents of mass violence almost always involve men.
But it would be good to get other people's opinions, particularly since the theory of 'broken boys' should be applicable globally (and i'm not a guy, so what do I know?)

I do think men should be able comfortable exploring the full spectrum of human emotion, rather than having to outwardly perpetuate stereotypes - and I think America, being the epicenter of media (superheroes, cowboys, war films etc) definitely feeds into that.

What Mass Killers Really Have in Common:
https://www.thecut.com/2016/07/mass-killers-terrorism-domestic-violence.html
 
The amount of people on Twitter saying "gun laws don't work, look at Chicago" is staggering.

How can people be so dumb?
"Now, before I sell you this easily transportable weapon of mass murder, I need to make absolutely sure you don't ever intend on going to Chicago. Do you proooomise?"
 
"Now, before I sell you this easily transportable weapon of mass murder, I need to make absolutely sure you don't ever intend on going to Chicago. Do you proooomise?"
Ha indeed. Funny and sad at the same time. The earlier argument too about there not being borders around towns that have stricter gun laws is too easily overlooked. I mean, Canada is literally only a few hours from Chicago, hell it's a mere few minutes from Detroit but there is an actual border into an area that has actual strict gun control. Guess what, it works in that case.
 
Why? It certainly is not a straight equation, but there is some grain of truth in there.

Personally for me, unless you get rid of 2nd Amendment, this problem will always be there.

There's not. They don't work IN CHICAGO, yes. But why don't they? Because you can just commute 20 minutes out of the city center and none of those laws apply. Hell, there are so many guns circulating in the US, so many of them illegal or undocumented, that we might actually be past the point of no return, but that shouldn't stop anyone from trying. At large, conservative Americans (and a fair share of liberals) are too dumb for this train of thought though. Most revealing has been that NRA guy John Oliver interviewed years ago, arguing that you shouldn't introduce any regulation on guns because "look at drugs, people still take them". Remember, hellbent republican and NRA member. When Oliver took on this point, asking him if that meant that he was against any regulation of all drugs, he was absolutely lost for words. They just like their stupid culture too much to be touched by a few thousand dead people. Reason is lost on them.
 
Its also cause they dont want to first admit they have a problem. Thats the problem with people who are mentally ill.
A big reason for that is the stigma that still surrounds the words 'mental illness' and the demonisation that groups people who have depression with people who have way more serious issues.

Even over here, the DWP and Atos take a hard stance towards those with mental issues and people who go for PIP or ESA assessments are often rejected and they have to go to court when the appeals process fails... only that going to court puts even more stress upon those with mental illness so there's months, maybe even a year or so of misery before it gets that far - in which time quite a few people get sanctioned, withheld from money/support and end up killing themselves.

The last paragraph took a bit of a tangent but that is another reason why some are afraid to speak out as they can end up having to live on scraps, going through a rigorous and mentally taxing process just to get support.

People with mental illnesses don't want to suffer alone through them but many feel they have no choice and now the prevalence of the word 'snowflakes' doesn't help matters.
 
I know there are a lot of American posters on here. I am sorry for the people in Florida. I have been there but I don't understand America, and neither, it seems, do most of the non-Americans on here. Europe, Australia, most of the places I have been to in the world have different values to the 'right to bear arms' thing, which apparently comes from historic sources in the violent birth of that nation. A friend who researched the Shannon Hydroelectric Scheme in Ireland in the 1920's showed how Ireland was literally bristling with arms after the war of independence from Britain and the subsequent Irish Civil war (Gangs of thugs, newly demobbed, help to break strikes among the Shannon workers). But gradually as constitutional politics took hold, Ireland - very consciously - instituted an unarmed police force and, as my grannie used to say, 'the guns were put in the thatch'. Secreted away in the attic to rust or at least until the next time of crisis.
 
Yes you did. You said there is truth to it.

Stricter gun laws does not automatically mean lesser crime. That's the truth I was referring to.

There's not. They don't work IN CHICAGO, yes. But why don't they? Because you can just commute 20 minutes out of the city center and none of those laws apply. Hell, there are so many guns circulating in the US, so many of them illegal or undocumented, that we might actually be past the point of no return, but that shouldn't stop anyone from trying.

Not disagreeing with you, but let's break this down. If stricter laws doesn't work in Chicago, why do you think it'll work anywhere else? If your problem is illegal and undocumented guns, then surely you need to call for better enforcement and not more laws?
 
Stricter gun laws does not automatically mean lesser crime. That's the truth I was referring to.



Not disagreeing with you, but let's break this down. If stricter laws doesn't work in Chicago, why do you think it'll work anywhere else? If your problem is illegal and undocumented guns, then surely you need to call for better enforcement and not more laws?

Based on memory and I believe that it was from the FBI, the problem that Illinois exposed is the legal purchase of firearms that are then illegally sold. If you have stricter laws, you potentially reduce significantly the amount of firearms that can be illegally sold.
 
Last edited:
I know there are a lot of American posters on here. I am sorry for the people in Florida. I have been there but I don't understand America, and neither, it seems, do most of the non-Americans on here. Europe, Australia, most of the places I have been to in the world have different values to the 'right to bear arms' thing, which apparently comes from historic sources in the violent birth of that nation. A friend who researched the Shannon Hydroelectric Scheme in Ireland in the 1920's showed how Ireland was literally bristling with arms after the war of independence from Britain and the subsequent Irish Civil war (Gangs of thugs, newly demobbed, help to break strikes among the Shannon workers). But gradually as constitutional politics took hold, Ireland - very consciously - instituted an unarmed police force and, as my grannie used to say, 'the guns were put in the thatch'. Secreted away in the attic to rust or at least until the next time of crisis.

I think most of us understand the culture, we all just think it's absolutely batshit mental.
 
Based on memory and I believe that it was from the FBI, the problem with that Illinois exposed is the legal purchase of firearms that are then illegally sold. If you have stricter laws, you potentially reduce significantly the amount of firearms that can be illegally sold.

Makes sense.

I think a federal law change covering all states should be the way forward. Else you can buy legally in a state with lax rules and transport/sell it across state lines.
 
Stricter gun laws does not automatically mean lesser crime. That's the truth I was referring to.


I think the first issue that needs fixing is the mass shootings epidemic. The wider gun debate can come later.

Mass shootings are getting more frequent and more deadly. AR15s and other assault weapons are the gun of choice for most mass shooters. Those weapons where banned from 1994-2004, and they were very expensive up until around 2010. Today they are extremely cheap, and because there are lot in circulation ammo is also very cheap. Not to mention all the accessories like large capacity mags, bump stock etc are all very cheap these days. Reintroducing the assault weapon ban and making it permanent is the best way to start improving things.
 
We all know what Republicans will say, but are any Dems coming out saying something must be done or don't they give a shit either?
 
Not disagreeing with you, but let's break this down. If stricter laws doesn't work in Chicago, why do you think it'll work anywhere else? If your problem is illegal and undocumented guns, then surely you need to call for better enforcement and not more laws?

Gun laws in Illinois don't work because you can drive into Illinois from Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan, Indiana, Kentucky etc etc.

It needs to be on a federal level.
 
We all know what Republicans will say, but are any Dems coming out saying something must be done or don't they give a shit either?
The democrats had both houses and the presidency from 2008-2010. Remember their big effort to restrict guns? I don't either.
 
America cares more about its guns than its children.
It's becoming difficult to sympathise.
I'm ashamed to say that.
I shed a tear watching a documentary on Dunblane, recently. I'm afraid my thoughts no longer go to the victims of U.S. mass-shootings.
I just go to disbelief and anger towards the country and it's citizens who enable it.

Not a proud realisation.
 
The only way this will ever change is to sort out all the ways the politics system is corrupt

Then get obliterate the republican party for at least a 5 year period
 
A spokesperson for the white supremacist group Republic of Florida (ROF) told the Anti-Defamation League on Thursday, February 15, that Nikolas Cruz, the man charged with the previous day’s deadly shooting spree at a Parkland, Florida, high school, was associated with his group.

On Wednesday, February 14, , Cruz, 19, a former student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, allegedly entered the school with an AR-15 and opened fire, killing at least 17 people and injuring 14 more. Cruz left the scene but was later captured by police and has been charged with premeditated murder.

After self-described ROF members claimed on the discussion forum 4chan that Cruz had also been a member, the Anti-Defamation League called the ROF hotline and spoke with an ROF member who identified himself as Jordan Jereb.

Jereb, based in Tallahassee, is believed to be the leader of ROF. In 2016, he was arrested on charges of threatening a staffer in the office of Florida Governor Rick Scott because he was allegedly angry at the staffer’s son.

Jereb said that Cruz was associated with ROF, having been “brought up” by another membe. Jereb added that Cruz had participated in one or more ROF training exercises in the Tallahassee area, carpooling with other ROF members from south Florida.

ROF has members in north and south Florida. The alt right white supremacist group borrows paramilitary concepts from the anti-government extremist militia movement (not itself a white supremacist movement). ROF describes itself as a “white civil rights organization fighting for white identitarian politics” and seeks to create a “white ethnostate” in Florida. Most ROF members are young and the group itself is only a few years old.

Jereb added that ROF had not ordered or wanted Cruz to do anything like the school shooting.

If Cruz’s role is confirmed, the Parkland school shooting would be the second school shooting by a white supremacist in the past two months. In December 2017, another young white supremacist, William Atchison, engaged in a shooting spree at a high school in northwest New Mexico, killing two students before shooting himself.
 
A straight up ban, across the board.

Draw a line, it'll take a long time but future generations will thank you.
I agree with you. You have to wonder why some people think it's a reasonable thing for a teenage lad to be able to buy a rifle of this type. His opportunity to do that in the UK would be absolutely zero.
 
Dumb GOP Senator on CNN talking about security perimeters around school, and security measures. No mention of any gun legislation though.

Sen Mike Rounds South Dakota. What a bellend. obviously taking money form the gun lobby.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.