Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Or leave NI in the Customs Union whilst the rest of Britain leaves, which is what the EU wants.

And would be extremely beneficial to all involved.

I can definitely see how doing that would make a united Ireland more likely but probably less so than putting an armed border between the two countries

If May says she doesn't want CU/SM and passporting, Ireland might not be the biggest problem.
Imagine if someone had tried to do so much harm to the country in the past, they'd be in the Tower by now or worse.
 
While I have nothing against countries abiding to eu membership rules, they must apply to everyone and be adhered to by all members, until then they can feck off and stop using beurocratic bullshit as a tool. Somebody that is not willing to bend is making this more difficult than it need be.

That's makes absolutely no sense
 
It's not the EU rules, it's the WTO rules. If the UK want to leave the EU, then they go but they're not going to get special treatment from anyone. I think all this was classed as scaremongering but it's all coming home to roost - what the Uk government want to do is impossible so they should stop wasting time posturing and deal with reality.

No one wants a hard border, not difficult to understand.
 
UK and irish seem happy with no hard border

No one wants a hard border, not difficult to understand.

No-one wants a hard border except the people who voted for Brexit because that is precisely what they voted for.
They voted to leave the EU, if they want to leave the EU but not have a border they have to stay in the CU/SM, very very simple.
 
No-one wants a hard border except the people who voted for Brexit because that is precisely what they voted for.
They voted to leave the EU, if they want to leave the EU but not have a border they have to stay in the CU/SM, very very simple.
Someone wants a hard border rhen, who is it paul?
 
No-one wants a hard border except the people who voted for Brexit because that is precisely what they voted for.
They voted to leave the EU, if they want to leave the EU but not have a border they have to stay in the CU/SM, very very simple.

One can't expect them to understand that though, they have proven themselves incapable of it, hence they'll always point fingers elsewhere. And because there was a moment in 2016 where they outnumberd those that do understand they will eternally be right. They can do as they wish (not that they have wishes, they didn't think it through that far) and it shall always be someone else's fault should anything displease them as a consequence.
 
I see that we are still stuck in the hard/soft border fallacy.

No one want or asked for a hard border, what is required by WTO and common sense is a regulated border between two different economic areas with two different jurisdictions; regulated borders are soft borders. The entire problem here is that one part is asking for an open border while demanding for two totally independent jurisdictions. In theory the solution is simple, if you want an open border offer a custom union model that suits you and the EU.
 
I see that we are still stuck in the hard/soft border fallacy.

No one want or asked for a hard border, what is required by WTO and common sense is a regulated border between two different economic areas with two different jurisdictions; regulated borders are soft borders. The entire problem here is that one part is asking for an open border while demanding for two totally independent jurisdictions. In theory the solution is simple, if you want an open border offer a custom union model that suits you and the EU.

A custom's union alone is not sufficient and more so the cherries the UK are asking for are not compatible with the the idea of a regulated border.
 
One can't expect them to understand that though, they have proven themselves incapable of it, hence they'll always point fingers elsewhere. And because there was a moment in 2016 where they outnumberd those that do understand they will eternally be right. They can do as they wish (not that they have wishes, they didn't think it through that far) and it shall always be someone else's fault should anything displease them as a consequence.

No they don't understand, what they thought they were voting for in 2016 is very far removed what they did actually vote for.
 
A custom's union alone is not sufficient and more so the cherries the UK are asking for are not compatible with the the idea of a regulated border.

True, you need a custom union and a free trade agreement but everything starts with the CU. The CU is the framework while the FTA is the usage, you absolutely need a CU to have open borders.
 
I've yet to understand why Theresa May took the job especially since not even Brexiteers wanted it (or want it) in the first place. I sympathise with people who stick to their ideology through thick and thin and I can understand those who are opportunistic. However TM doesn't even believe in Brexit and there's little to gain in being PM at this point in time (else she would have been backstabbed long ago). S

She will be forever remembered as the Lady version of Neville Chamberlian and Jimmy Carter. Is that a legacy worth throwing away your political career for?
 
I've yet to understand why Theresa May took the job especially since not even Brexiteers wanted it (or want it) in the first place. I sympathise with people who stick to their ideology through thick and thin and I can understand those who are opportunistic. However TM doesn't even believe in Brexit and there's little to gain in being PM at this point in time (else she would have been backstabbed long ago). S

She will be forever remembered as the Lady version of Neville Chamberlian and Jimmy Carter. Is that a legacy worth throwing away your political career for?

But she got the top job, being known as the worst PM in living memory probably doesn't even bother her.
 
I've yet to understand why Theresa May took the job especially since not even Brexiteers wanted it (or want it) in the first place. I sympathise with people who stick to their ideology through thick and thin and I can understand those who are opportunistic. However TM doesn't even believe in Brexit and there's little to gain in being PM at this point in time (else she would have been backstabbed long ago). S

She will be forever remembered as the Lady version of Neville Chamberlian and Jimmy Carter. Is that a legacy worth throwing away your political career for?

Maybe she thinks that someone is going to come at her rescue. Objectively within Tory there is probably more people against a reckless brexit than for it, so she probably tabled on an internal rebellion. Now the problem is that no one in that party has an ounce of courage, brexiteers are not willing to assume their initial agenda of "brexit means brexit and we want control of our borders at all cost" while the the rest of the party are too afraid to upset the part of the electorate who was convinced that difficult choices would not have to be made. I saw someone make the perfect summary you have to choose between brexit and The Good Friday agreement.
 
But she got the top job, being known as the worst PM in living memory probably doesn't even bother her.

That's the thing. What's the point of getting the top job only to be remembered as the worst PM in history?
 
So the UK are happy to keep receiving EU citizens?

Without EU citizens coming into the UK the economy would tank - BREXIT will not make much difference to immigration from EU countries imo whether there is a hard or soft border. It's hard to believe but some idiots thought that BREXIT would mean all non-white's being deported immediately - there is that mind set out there. Imagine their surprise when this does not occur, people from other countries continue to move here and the only thing that really changes is that all our salaries continue to stagnate and unemployment goes through the roof due to the economy crashing and companies ditching the UK.
 
Without EU citizens coming into the UK the economy would tank - BREXIT will not make much difference to immigration from EU countries imo whether there is a hard or soft border. It's hard to believe but some idiots thought that BREXIT would mean all non-white's being deported immediately - there is that mind set out there. Imagine their surprise when this does not occur, people from other countries continue to move here and the only thing that really changes is that all our salaries continue to stagnate and unemployment goes through the roof due to the economy crashing and companies ditching the UK.
While this is certainly true also worth mentioning the anti immigration element isn't just with white people

The British Asian vote for Brexit contains a few surprises
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/02/20/the-british-asian-vote-for-brexit-contains-a-few-surprises/

Why Did South Asians Vote for Brexit?
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/wdabxb/why-did-south-asians-vote-for-brexit
 
Maybe she thinks that someone is going to come at her rescue. Objectively within Tory there is probably more people against a reckless brexit than for it, so she probably tabled on an internal rebellion. Now the problem is that no one in that party has an ounce of courage, brexiteers are not willing to assume their initial agenda of "brexit means brexit and we want control of our borders at all cost" while the the rest of the party are too afraid to upset the part of the electorate who was convinced that difficult choices would not have to be made. I saw someone make the perfect summary you have to choose between brexit and The Good Friday agreement.

I can’t possibly see a scenario where she might end up on top. Time is running out and the government is at complete mercy of the DUP. The latter demand no hard borders with the ROI AND with the UK which goes against any possible solution apart from the UK remaining in the customs union. However that would mean burning bridges with the hard Brexiteers whom in turn has enough votes to topple the government. Not to forget the remainers camp who might ally with JC if the view shift too much on the hard Brexit side.

All of that totally ignores the big elephant in the room that also happens to hold most of the cards ie the EU. Each and every EU member has its own red lines but also happen to know not to fall in the divide and conquer trap by breaking ranks and deal with the UK on an individual basis. Then, there’s of course there’s rest of the world watching. If let’s say the UK is generous with the EU then other countries like India will expect the same treatment especially since Brexiteers had been mumbling about a ‘close relationship’ with commonwealth countries for months. Not to forget Donald Trump who is an unpredictable spoiled kid who had made it quite clear that he supported Brexit mainly because it weakened the EU.

I can understand someone who fecks his career for some ideology. People are even willing to sacrifice their lives for something they believe in. I can also sympathise with people who are being swept away by something which was way out of their control. For example Neville Chamberlain gets plenty of slack however he couldn’t possibly predict that a former WW1 soldier of all people who witnessed the terror of a world war would risk initiating a second world war (not that I am comparing Brexit with WW2 but you get the drift). However, this Brexit thing was highly predictable from day 1. No wonder why the likes of Gove, Davies, Leadstom, Mogg and Johnson committed or/are committing all sort of gaffes to avoid having to drink the poisoned chalice. However, I can’t understand Theresa May. What’s the point in her being a PM who is leading the country into something she doesn’t even believe in especially since she knows it’s going to end bad.

Paul mentioned her eagerness to become PM at all cost. However she could still have achieved that by becoming PM only to resign the moment the GE votes didn’t give her the majority she needed to govern.
 
While this is certainly true also worth mentioning the anti immigration element isn't just with white people

The British Asian vote for Brexit contains a few surprises
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2017/02/20/the-british-asian-vote-for-brexit-contains-a-few-surprises/

Why Did South Asians Vote for Brexit?
https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/wdabxb/why-did-south-asians-vote-for-brexit

I am not surprised. Many believed the Brexiteers mantra that if the UK can control EU immigration then it would be able to be more generous with non EU immigrants especially those coming from the commonwealth.
 
Without EU citizens coming into the UK the economy would tank - BREXIT will not make much difference to immigration from EU countries imo whether there is a hard or soft border. It's hard to believe but some idiots thought that BREXIT would mean all non-white's being deported immediately - there is that mind set out there. Imagine their surprise when this does not occur, people from other countries continue to move here and the only thing that really changes is that all our salaries continue to stagnate and unemployment goes through the roof due to the economy crashing and companies ditching the UK.

There it is again

Who are these non white Europeans you speak of?
 
That's the thing. What's the point of getting the top job only to be remembered as the worst PM in history?

It's like any profession, if you become a politician most of them would like to reach the top of their profession, the same for an English footballer would like to be the captain of England or someone working for a company would like to become the chairman, doesn't necessarily mean that they are the best or the most popular.
 
Without EU citizens coming into the UK the economy would tank - BREXIT will not make much difference to immigration from EU countries imo whether there is a hard or soft border. It's hard to believe but some idiots thought that BREXIT would mean all non-white's being deported immediately - there is that mind set out there. Imagine their surprise when this does not occur, people from other countries continue to move here and the only thing that really changes is that all our salaries continue to stagnate and unemployment goes through the roof due to the economy crashing and companies ditching the UK.

Yes the UK needs immigration, they don't realise it but basically they have voted for less white and more multi-coloured.

There it is again

Who are these non white Europeans you speak of?

You really don't think there are any idiots in this world?
 
Yes the UK needs immigration, they don't realise it but basically they have voted for less white and more multi-coloured.



You really don't think there are any idiots in this world?

There are but they don't all wear the same shirt, have the same hairstyle, support the same team or vote the same way.
 
There are but they don't all wear the same shirt, have the same hairstyle, support the same team or vote the same way.

Nobody said they did but here we're talking about a specific thing and many people did something gravely serious when they had not the faintest idea what they were doing. Maybe we have a different definition of idiots.
It does remind me of one conversation(argument) I had with someone I know why they voted for Brexit which basically boiled down to them voting Brexit to protect their grandchildren from being governed by a Muslim run state. Maybe I'm wrong.
 
The people who clusterfcuked Brexit into happening, because thats basically how it happened and still happens, are the same feckwits who forgot about the Northern Ireland problem to begin with. Now they are willing to restart the conflict here just to get their blue passports. Horrible horrible bunch of cnuts!
 
Nobody said they did but here we're talking about a specific thing and many people did something gravely serious when they had not the faintest idea what they were doing. Maybe we have a different definition of idiots.
It does remind me of one conversation(argument) I had with someone I know why they voted for Brexit which basically boiled down to them voting Brexit to protect their grandchildren from being governed by a Muslim run state. Maybe I'm wrong.
When I asked my team lead how he was going to vote he said 'Remain', I said 'Really, why?', he said 'I dunno, what do I know about these things?'

I wonder how many remainers knew what they were voting for?

Well you'd need a vivid imagination to think about bold part but if you have, you can see muslim extremists moving through Europe with ease as fom allows. I personally don't ever see anything like that of course but I think fom is bad.
 
When I asked my team lead how he was going to vote he said 'Remain', I said 'Really, why?', he said 'I dunno, what do I know about these things?'

I wonder how many remainers knew what they were voting for?

Well you'd need a vivid imagination to think about bold part but if you have, you can see muslim extremists moving through Europe with ease as fom allows. I personally don't ever see anything like that of course but I think fom is bad.

The first part is what I've said all along, this shouldn't be decided by a referendum, people on the whole don't know enough about, on the other hand since the referendum, you read comments and political figures are still continuing with a stream of lies and clearly people still believe it.
You should have watched David Davis today, top class idiot and he's the chief negotiator!