JohnnyKills
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Messages
- 7,100
Witch Hunt! Is that you Donald?
Witch Hunt! Is that you Donald?
I agree that Rudd's deception is completely unpalatable. But are woodock on the others actually defending her? In other words, are they supporting her on this specific issue?I do think it's important politicians on either side of the divide are able to at least partly get along with each other, and for as much as Corbyn's a world away from the centrists of the party I'd assume he'll have plenty of Tories who he's on friendly terms with. Indeed, I've heard that in parliament you'll often see cases of politicians on completely opposite sides getting along well; often they already know their divisions and can air them publicly, whereas bad blood fosters between people within the same party because divisions are a lot more concealed and accentuate over time.
But I can see why people are pissed off here at Labour MP's defending Rudd. This isn't a case of a Tory minister standing down due to personal reasons, or ill-health, or because she's stood up valiantly against her party on an issue of principle. She's been forced to resign because she mislead parliament on an issue that has caused misery for a number of people who're in Britain just so that the very same minister can look slightly better to the public. And while the buck should ultimately stop with May at the very top, Rudd's got some culpability, and Labour MP's shouldn't be fawning over her on social media, irrespective of how decent she may come across behind the scenes. There's a time and a place for it, and as has been evidenced cooperation can often work wonders. But I'm not sure there's much need for defending/arguing in favour of a Tory minister who's resigned in disgrace here.
I'd die happy knowing that I tried to bridge our divide. You'd have to live with your guilt.
Would you be holding up a Wenger out sign?
I agree that Rudd's deception is completely unpalatable. But are woodock on the others actually defending her? In other words, are they supporting her on this specific issue?
You damn hipster.![]()
Not sure about that either. On the one hand Angell's twitter features lots of (re)tweets favouring trans rights, anti-racism, protection of immigrants & refugees, criticizing anti-Islam populism, Trumpism and so on. On the other hand:Ah yeah, looks like he got me.
So who knows if the brackets thing got lumped together with that (over the Labour antisemitism row or whatever). So I'm still confused over that post, I'll just wait if there'll be an answer to my question.Right Wing
(...)
Blairites(neoliberal)
There aren't actually the many in the party, it's mostly just the think tank/pressure group Progress(Richard angel) and a few MP's. They have very little power in the party and are constantly losing whatever power the have left. What they do have is good media connections.
Wenger's a lot like the Blairites to be fair - successful between 1997 and 2004 with an increasing downward spiral since then.
Why are you quoting me ?Not sure about that either. On the one hand Angell's twitter features lots of (re)tweets favouring trans rights, anti-racism, protection of immigrants & refugees, criticizing anti-Islam populism, Trumpism and so on. On the other hand:
So who knows if the brackets thing got lumped together with that (over the Labour antisemitism row or whatever). So I'm still confused over that post, I'll just wait if there'll be an answer to my question.
To highlight why Angell may be considered "right wing" by some.Why are you quoting me ?
Oh fair enough.To highlight why Angell may be considered "right wing" by some.
Corbyn will consider Tory MPs his friends, past and present. Because Corbyn isn't a child. That's kind of how life works. You enrich your experiences by associating with those different to you. You become a better person and as @Pogue Mahone says, you avoid the echo chamber. Arguably it's one of the flaws currently of the hard left that there isn't much debate beyond 'everyone who disagrees is a Tory and should leave the party'. Full echo chamber embracing and that's not healthy and damaging to the party and ultimately helps the Tories.
Saw an opinion poll today where it's 41/40 in their favour. Others will be couple of points either way but I want to stop pretending that that's good enough. This government should be 15-20 points behind in every poll. Easily. If someone is concerned that the Tories are doing well in the polls despite everything, such thing doesn't make them a Tory.
Literally the best result since 1997 and the reason there was such low expectations was because the PLP tried a coup on the leader. Christ almighty talk about selective memory loss.It isn't so much even the polls, frustrating as they are, it's how the government is able to get away with so much and Labour's front bench seem completely unable to capitalise. The party are a near irrelevance when it comes to Brexit, for example. If the front bench exerted as much pressure on the government as it could then they'd have won far more concessions and maybe we wouldn't be going down the 'hold your nose, jump and hope for the best' Brexit we seem to be.
There is no media strategy. The party is awful at communicating its message and the argument for why seems to be both that the right wing media are scum and not worth bothering with - and also that they're tremendously influential. It really can't be both, but somehow it is.
This government get away with so much that would have had any other government at any other time in history on its knees and yet because it looks over at the Labour party and sees all the attention focused on the fact Jess Phillips should quit because she is friends with a Tory, it's able to get away with it. Even the last election was only a good result if you start off from the base of ridiculously low expectations. A party that just took a country through a divisive and unnecessary election - and lost - had no real business retaining power, let alone win 55 more seats than the biggest opposition party.
I guess where my frustration lies is that the response should be: Yeah that isn't good enough, what can we do better? Instead it's: This is good enough, shut up Tory!
The irony being that if I was a Tory I'd be absolutely delighted with that.
Literally the best result since 1997 and the reason there was such low expectations was because the PLP tried a coup on the leader. Christ almighty talk about selective memory loss.
Also you didn't vote Labour in the last election![]()
Wait whaaat? I'm hopefully missing a joke here as I've only skimmed the thread after being away a few days.Richard Angell surrounds his twitter handle in brackets. He’s pretty right wing.
O'Brien hitting the nail again. I voted labour as usual but tbh, it was out of habit as with the last GE. I know a lot of people who voted for him at the primary, unhappy with how he's handled Brexit.
I'm not so sure. It's widely viewed 60%+ of the party voted remain. I voted labour at the end of the day but I know quite a few Corbyn and passionate labour voters who did not bother turning up. Coupled with the unable to pick up centrist votes, it's easy to see why things are the way they are.Didn't last night just show(For the millionth time) that there really is no case for Labour to adopt a Remain case. Yes their position on brexit is rubbish but if anything they somehow need to be more pro leaving.
Feck me. How low does May need to go to lose an election to Labour? Start biting the heads off babies on the front steps of 10 Downing Street?
It's definitely pointless now the Lib Dems have secured enough council seats to cancel Brexit.Didn't last night just show(For the millionth time) that there really is no case for Labour to adopt a Remain case. Yes their position on brexit is rubbish but if anything they somehow need to be more pro leaving.
But it's not enough to win a election, they need the Labour voters who voted out. I think the strategy(If you can even call it that)is to offer a very left wing brexit in a hope it will appeal to the more lefty city areas while the Labour leave voters see the party is ''respecting the referendum'', again it's not a great plan but I've yet to see anyone come up with a better one.I'm not so sure. It's widely viewed 60%+ of the party voted remain.
But does that have anything to do with Labour supporting Brexit or it being local elections and people not being that arsed ?I voted labour at the end of the day but I know quite a few Corbyn and passionate labour voters who did not bother turning up.
These votes just don't exist or if they do it's such such a low percentage that it's not worth making concessions to.Coupled with the unable to pick up centrist votes,
I thought she already lost a General Election to Labour? Aside from the small detail of having actually won more seats. Im sure I remember reading that Labour won it anyway.Feck me. How low does May need to go to lose an election to Labour? Start biting the heads off babies on the front steps of 10 Downing Street?
All the biggest and best winners have to hand over £1bn to win. The more money it takes, the more you win.I thought she already lost a General Election to Labour? Aside from the small detail of having actually won more seats. Im sure I remember reading that Labour won it anyway.
It's easy all Corbyn has to do is wrap himself in a EU flag and give a speech on top of a fighter jet(Presumably a Eurofighter)and then all the nasty bad Brexit people will disappear and we can remain in the EU.It's definitely pointless now the Lib Dems have secured enough council seats to cancel Brexit.
Labour needs to adopt a massively more racist immigration policy. It's clearly what the people want.If you can’t win big against this Tory lot, you’re not going to do shit in the long term.
So true. And promise to lock a lot more people up as well, that will bolster their numbers.Labour needs to adopt a massively more racist immigration policy. It's clearly what the people want.
Lock them up in places that are a fire hazard waiting to happen, just to be sure. The people have spoken and they love that shit.So true. And promise to lock a lot more people up as well, that will bolster their numbers.
Don't think the cons will have such a disaster of a campaign again.Think it needs to be remembered that the local results last year were genuinely abominable for Labour, and still saw a massive surge in the GE. Might rely on that kind of home-run campaign again, but perfectly plausible.
I think so.
Sadly for Corbyn, this should spell the end. I like a lot of things about the man but as you say, if he can't make a dent in the tories after Windrush, Brexit etc, the party and his leadership is fecking pointless.
Looking at the results, maybe the 'moderates' plan to capitalise on Windrush by making Jim Davidson leader and getting those immigration mugs made a bit bigger?With most Tory voters being unwilling to move to anyone due to Brexit, nobody else could do any better. Peak Blair would have struggled.