I see Striker10 is still a maniac.
Alex Jones's channel deleted from YouTube ft. MUTV presenter appreciation
- Thread starter Nikhil
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?( I wonder if it's to influence people who are not clued in or tech savvy and perhaps who are much more likely to vote) This is all politics and from my POV, he must return to youtube and if you don't want to watch him? Don't. But some people choose to be offended for a whole host of reasons. Oh and check out the alex jones indie song which is really good
Parklife!
@2cents
Somehow forgot this gem:
edit - Chomsky gets some intense hate from Leninists (imperialist pied-piper carrying water for the Dems), contempt from Marxists (naive liberal), vigorous disagreement from many on the left (mostly for fanatical commitment to free speech), hatred from the mainstream right (traitor), and then this from Alex Jones (NWO shill!).
Somehow forgot this gem:
edit - Chomsky gets some intense hate from Leninists (imperialist pied-piper carrying water for the Dems), contempt from Marxists (naive liberal), vigorous disagreement from many on the left (mostly for fanatical commitment to free speech), hatred from the mainstream right (traitor), and then this from Alex Jones (NWO shill!).
Last edited:
You missed my personal favourite: why don't we 'censor' the dark web?
Edit: you didn't. But that point is so hilarious I thought it worth repeating.
Last edited:
Great, I’ll have a listen tomorrow. Still can’t find the letter Jones is claiming he received.
I think it's mostly an act, and it works. I mean I still think he's a morally bankrupt wanker of the highest order, but I doubt whether he believes all that Sandy Hook bollocks. If he was that loony he wouldn't be this successful, would he?
They can be fun, depending on what truths they think they've discovered. One I know just ended up believing in all the conspiracy theories. Not literally, he doesn't believe in aliens or that the earth is flat. Other than those, I struggle to think of one he isn't fully on board with. Decent enough bloke to just hang out with otherwise, but it doesn't take much for him to go off on one, and it's infuriating when he does. He becomes incredibly overbearing and obnoxious while he lectures you on how the Rotschilds pay scientists to claim climate change is real or whatever.Ok I'm sold, gonna read it when I've had a puff. I like those guys
One I used to work with was more chill. Fairly harmless stuff, and it was amusing to listen to him prattle on about all the little things he'd figured out.
They are so sure because they read it on the internet. It doesn't take that much to spread complete misinformation as long as you sound like you know what you're talking about. I get it that there are forces hidden from us that have ill intentions, but that's about as far as we can accurately estimate. In truth, no one really knows what's going on.
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?
This kind of reminded me of the part in the Jurassic Park book where Dr Ian Malcolm has a Morphine induced rambling monalogue about the perils of Science whilst badly wounded & trapped in the park
Except in this reality it's Alex Jones having a Ketamine induced rambling monalogue about the perils of YouTube with a badly wounded ego trapped on a park bench.
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?
Wow. This is special. The bolded bit might just be my favourite thing I've read on here all year.
I don't know, my favourite part is the one where he apparently thinks hiring assassins on the dark web is legal (or at least more legal than Alex Jones).
No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?
U ok hun?
Am I reading it wrong, or is he asking why governments are in debt when they can just print more money and not be in debt?
Because that's adorable.
Suspensions are probably +EV for him, with all the exposure it gets
Well of course, everyone knows once something isn't censored, that means it's legal. Of course.
Silly governments all over the world. How do countries all around the world ever starve, when they can just print more money to buy food. Insane how no one has thought about this before.
Jack....should stop tap dancing around the issue and make a final decision (ideally to get rid).
He wishes.
teleSUR English Removed From Facebook for Second Time
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/n...cebook-for-the-Second-Time-20180813-0009.html
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/n...cebook-for-the-Second-Time-20180813-0009.html
Freedom of speech doesnt mean that people have to provide you with a platform to exercise your right... So feck him!
Alex Jones Somehow Getting Crazier
He’s terrified of the precedent it would set in regards to high profile far right accounts getting called out one by one by media campaigns just like Jones has. The majority of those accounts with huge followings have broken the TOS at various points so finding evidence to ban them wouldn’t be hard.
If that happened and these right wing idols start getting picked off, it would hurt their traffic when the disciples follow.
A one week suspension won’t make him change his ways.
How the feck is Alex Jones only 44 years old?
Brain Force Plus
Gay frogs obviously ageing him.
This is 1st class satirical writing.No. Here's the thing. People can say he's a nut and deserves to be censored but prove to anyone he's not playing a role for the sole purpose of introducing censorship and you can't and therefore it's a dangerous route to go down JUST because you believe he's this or that (it means you take things at face value). Because then you are being herded like sheep down a certain interlectual path that don't HAVE to be true.... If you follow politics or know much the CIA coined the term conspiracy theorist. By definition in 2018, if you ask a question that is not supported by the mainstream, that is what you are. It's dangerous to be put under an umbrella because it allows for generalization. YouTube and the like talk about 'hate speech', but this is all politically motivated. People don't get that when you have big corporations financing people trying to get into government, then THAT by it's nature IS a conspiracy. And likewise if a government was in control how can it ever be in debt and what is the purpose of any government to be in debt? It can only ever be to influence policy. Especially when you had a time whereby governments could create money interest free. It seems almost stupid to put debt on yourself unless there is a reason people are not told. But Corporations don't pay big money, for zero influence. It's bad business. So I think you can look at this from multiple perspectives rather then one. The foundation for me is the credibility of the man. Is he legitimate OR was his purpose to be seen as crazy as to create this snowball effect? When you legitimize something then you accept the notion of censorship PERIOD but isn't it funny? You have the dark web...where people can hire someone to commit murder say...or to buy drugs and that's not censored and that don't cause outrage...and yet you get the media thinking Alex Jones is the biggest threat?