I’m sorry, it doesn’t work like that in real life. Even bosses of ordinary working people have to respect their employees or risk a backlash. Again, it’s not just Pogba or these United players. Mourinho has fallen out with previous players before and previous clubs.
Mourinho defended Pogba in the beginning, yes! But he humiliated others and soon turned on Pogba himself. His post World Cup comments may seem innocuous to you because you’re not in the situation and are looking at them in a vacuum, but I can see how Pogba would have interpreted them as an unacceptable attack on himself that he needed to respond to. Mourinho was essentially tellin United fans that Pogba gives his all for France but not for United - is that fair? If Pogba thinks there’s issues at United that prevent him from being happy and performing at his best (like his managers on and off the field approach), shouldn’t he have the right to defend himself from that public attack? The moment Mourinho decides to air his grievances publicly, he sets the tone and the example! If he has a problem with Pogba, he should tell him privately.
This would all be excusable if we were out there playing well and winning trophies and it was one or two players. But we’re playing crap and Mourinho’s list of beef is growing. He cannot even spare Ed Woodward. If he doesn’t like Ed Woodward’s transfer work, why doesn’t he confront him to his face? Why publicly? Why make Woodward look like a shit transfer dealer to the world? And if he thinks it’s well within his rights to constantly question Woodward’s work publicly, why is he so upset when Pogba does it to him once? He wants to be the only one at United free to frame public opinion about himself and others?