Rape Discussion

Because guilty men go free?

It's like saying would you prefer a few innocent people to be stormed by the police when they're investigating terrorists, or would you prefer them to take no chances and make sure they get them. I think any reasonable person would prefer the second option.

The amount of innocents that get falsely accused is probably tiny compared to actual monsters who get away with it, and the idea of not being believed, or these sort of opinions that you and the poster quote, help to be responsible for that.


I would rather guilty men go free than innocent men spend years or decades behind bars.

There is a difference between Police arresting someone who is innocent in order to progress an investigation and someone being convicted in Court and losing years of their life. Terrorism example doesn’t work because that’s just an initial arrest (possibly preventing future harm) other than a conviction
 
Same. Happened earlier this year actually. I definitely didn't say yes to it and she was ploughing me with shots all night. But I don't see why anyone thinks it's useful to describe that as rape. On either side.

It helps to understand consent a bit better though doesn't it.

If you didn't say yes to it and she got you drunk, it's the same mentality as rape, it's the power of you that she had and she knew exactly what she was doing.

It's definitely not good.
 
I've been in the situation of being out of it drunk and having been taken home by a woman who then took advantage of me sexually. The one thing I can tell you for fecking certain is that I wasn't celebrating the next morning.

edit: maybe at some point I did say yes to it, I don't know, the point is that a yes in that state is meaningless.
Surely your penis was happy to consent or she wouldn’t have been able to take advantage of you. If the penis is not interested then it’s game over.
 
I would rather guilty men go free than innocent men spend years or decades behind bars.

There is a difference between Police arresting someone who is innocent in order to progress an investigation and someone being convicted in Court and losing years of their life. Terrorism example doesn’t work because that’s just an initial arrest (possibly preventing future harm) other than a conviction

I'd struggle to ever see a scenario where guilty rapists going free is preferable personally. But we differ. It happens.
 
Society really is in a mess right now. The entire globe is all over the place when it comes to how we treat the 51% of us that is a woman. I get that both sides of the coin want to protect each other from predators and false allegations but before we talk about a man being falsely accused we need to talk about the hundreds of thousands of rape kits that go untested and the obscenely low conviction rates for sexual assault.
We as parents, uncles, aunts, brothers and sisters should be more aware of the impacts of not teaching our youth about respect for themselves and other people. As a society the decriminalization of certain drugs would free up valuable time and resources for authorities to deal with cases like sexual abuse.
To prevent horrors like this being inflicted on women and men starts at home and in you're own social circle. There will always be a grey are but when people like Brock Turner's father, who called his son raping an unconscious woman behind a dumpster "20 minutes of action" are allowed to minimize these disgusting acts thats where we have to draw a big fecking line. The Ronaldo case is very complicated indeed, I have no clue what to think about it only empathy for that lady. The Kavanagh one is different. I've had dealings with cnuts like him and I can tell you this, that guy knows and has been involved in multiple sexual assaults. Not enough to haul him in to court but certainly enough to take pause on allowing him any prominent position in public service.
 
Shouldn't it be 'plying' in the hope that you'd then do the ploughing?

:lol: that's the one!

On either side? So if a man gets a woman (who wouldn’t sleep with him sober) blind drunk and takes her home that shouldn’t constitue rape? It’s a difficult discussion tbh.

I think there's two really tricky elements of that: "getting" them blind drunk, and the idea that alcohol alone changes the decision.

Let's try and use my case as an example, because it's a lot less of a touchy subject, and a lot less likely to incite someone like @Silva to jump in and call people rapists to make himself feel good.

This woman bought me a lot of drinks I wasn't asking for. I wasn't rejecting them either. I'd met her a couple of times before and I got the vibe she was keen, so I at one point mentioned I'm weirdly not attracted to white women. That was as blunt as I felt like being given we (loosely) work together.

At about 1am I decided it was time to head off. She appeared as I was jumping in the taxi and said she lives in that direction. I said nah, get your own in a half jokey, half serious way. She jumped in anyway. Then she jumped out where I lived. I suggested she get back in the taxi. She didn't.

At that point I'm basically resigned to the fact she wants to sleep with me, I can't really be arsed with drama and subsequent intense work awkwardness, so in she comes. I grab myself a glass of water and by the time I'm done, she's naked in bed. And away we go.

Did she buy me drinks hoping it would make me more likely to sleep with her? Maybe. Was I more likely to decide "ah feck it, whatever, it is what it is"? Probably. Does that combined mean she forced me to get drunk so she could force me to sleep with her? Not remotely. Does it make her a "predator"? I don't think so at all.

Maybe she just wanted to have a good time so bought loads of drinks, and then thought I was just being playful. If I didn't really consent to having sex then I wouldn't have had sex, right? I think it's a lot more complicated than that.

It's the kind of conversation that needs to be had openly among reasonable people. Unfortunately it's a conversation dominated by people like @Silva throwing out comments for a reaction, and to shame others, and inevitably gets a reaction like @DouLou's pushing hard in the other direction rather than trying to find a middle ground.

It helps to understand consent a bit better though doesn't it.

If you didn't say yes to it and she got you drunk, it's the same mentality as rape, it's the power of you that she had and she knew exactly what she was doing.

It's definitely not good.

Certainly. I have a better understanding of the nuances of consent now than I did back then. It was a bizarre scenario I'd never imagined before. But at the same time I still think it's incredibly unclear in some scenarios. Could she "reasonably believe" that I consented? I suppose so. I don't even know if I did consent. I definitely don't feel like I did, but I don't think it's entirely true to say I didn't.

I told her in indirect terms before that I didn't find her attractive, but maybe she thinks I happily sleep with people I'm not attracted to. Or maybe she thought she'd won my desire, and I was just making her work for it. I dunno. In any case, she misjudged. How you characterise that misjudgment is incredibly difficult, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Surely your penis was happy to consent or she wouldn’t have been able to take advantage of you. If the penis is not interested then it’s game over.

My dick doesn't have the cognitive capacity to consent to a sexual act. I appreciate that might be difficult to understand for someone whose arse seems to do their posting for them.
 
Nevertheless I’m sure you got my point.

It's actually not a good point, if you take the example of women it has been reported that women can have vaginal arousal during rape, it doesn't mean that they were consenting. Now I will be honest and tell you that I don't know how man actually function, I can only tell you that I had erections without being aroused which lead me to think that on that particular point we are not necessarily different to women.
 
Nevertheless I’m sure you got my point.

Not really, assuming you've got one, I'm sure you're aware that penises don't exactly operate in full cooperation with the brain a lot of the time, especially when you're younger. It's entirely possible for a penis to become erect and ejaculate when you're asleep or passed out, never mind blackout drunk. It's a sexual organ which reacts to stimulus, not a stand-in for a sober brain.
 
It's actually not a good point, if you take the example of women it has been reported that women can have vaginal arousal during rape, it doesn't mean that they were consenting. Now I will be honest and tell you that I don't know how man actually function, I can only tell you that I had erections without being aroused which lead me to think that on that particular point we are not necessarily different to women.

You can even ejaculate without having an orgasm, so the "he came so he liked it" can be false.
 
Did she buy me drinks hoping it would make me more likely to sleep with her? Maybe. Was I more likely to decide "ah feck it, whatever, it is what it is"? Probably. Does that combined mean she forced me to get drunk so she could force me to sleep with her? Not remotely. Does it make her a "predator"? I don't think so at all.

Maybe she just wanted to have a good time so bought loads of drinks, and then thought I was just being playful. If I didn't really consent to having sex then I wouldn't have had sex, right? I think it's a lot more complicated than that.
The story you presented doesn't really make a great case for playfulness, you said no at several points and she invited herself into your home. You're entitled to have changed your mind eventually or think it's wasn't a big issue. But someone with that same story, who hadn't changed their mind and was more impacted or traumatised by the experience should be able to press charges and receive therapy.
 
I'd struggle to ever see a scenario where guilty rapists going free is preferable personally. But we differ. It happens.
What he’s saying there about guilty going free vs. innocent being incarcerated is just echoing one of the most ingrained features of the western world’s judicial tradition.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone's_formulation

I don’t see why that’s been such a sticking point in this discussion.
 
I'd struggle to ever see a scenario where guilty rapists going free is preferable personally. But we differ. It happens.

The scenario is probably the most common of rape accusations. I think we can all agree that a man holding a woman down and having sex while she is screaming no, is a no brainer...put him in jail forever as far as I’m concerned.

However, what about a university student that is out on the piss with his mates at the pub, meets a group of girls also out in the piss - and they hook up. The guy is a great student, never been in any trouble, comes from a good family and volunteers on the weekend at the local Special Olympics association. He’s had a bit too much to drink just like his lady friend and they go back to her place and feck. He goes home the next morning after they exchange phone numbers. A few days later the girl decides she was probably too drunk to really give consent, even though she was just as active as he was during the fecking.

Can you see how this scenario is not the same as the guy who blatantly rapes a woman? Can you see how this scenario is probably much more common than the blatant rape scenario? Can you see how this could ruin an all around good kids life if the accusation gets out?

I agree with everyone here that rape is terrible. However, I am just as concerned raising a son than I am a daughter - for different reasons. Do guys need to start videotaping consent being given by a partner? Are we asking them to be able to act as a breathalyzer and be able to know the level of drunkenness of another person?

Different world we live in now - that’s for sure. I’m very happy I’m way past that stage in my life.
 
I agree with everyone here that rape is terrible. However, I am just as concerned raising a son than I am a daughter - for different reasons. Do guys need to start videotaping consent being given by a partner? Are we asking them to be able to act as a breathalyzer and be able to know the level of drunkenness of another person?
Nice idea for an app that. Tie it in with tinder, facebook and stuff. You have to give consent / write a contract together online before doing anything. It'll be on record. Privacy:lol:
 
Nice idea for an app that. Tie it in with tinder, facebook and stuff. You have to give consent / write a contract together online before doing anything. It'll be on record. Privacy:lol:

The thing is - I don’t really think we are that far away from a scenario like that. Was discussing it today with a police officer who has a 17 year old son. It isn’t just intercourse that is in play - it’s any sexual contact that is in question.

I really don’t think we are far from - “Today is Friday, July 11th, 11:34pm - I am Ben Smith - (turns cell phone camera to his girlfriend) - Jenny Wilson, do you hereby give me consent to touch your boobs tonight?”