Andersons Dietician
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 13,341
I don’t think it was you know, didn’t sound like him and normally Geoff has a bit of a giggle and laugh at his own jokes.was it Geoff Shreeves?
I don’t think it was you know, didn’t sound like him and normally Geoff has a bit of a giggle and laugh at his own jokes.was it Geoff Shreeves?
He didn’t even jump for the Luiz header at the end which hit the post and led to their 2nd goal.....
We need 2 new centre backs and then we might see some attacking football.
Let's be honest, they've got a better manager.Because City have unlimited funds and a manager who they trust completely. Easy question
He didn’t even jump for the Luiz header at the end which hit the post and led to their 2nd goal.....
We need 2 new centre backs and then we might see some attacking football.
Wasn't that Giroud ?He didn’t even jump for the Luiz header at the end which hit the post and led to their 2nd goal.....
We need 2 new centre backs and then we might see some attacking football.
It was Rashford that got a pulled up.He pulled up and we have a game midweek
Pushing Martial to CF if you are that arsed about tracking back. At least the ball was going to stick once or twice.Not really, it would still have been a bad and needless decision. There is no upside in taking Martial off and keeping Lukaku
Then he should have bought a better defender in the first place or improve Lindelof. Can't just keep buying defender after defender. Bailly is also his buy. There is more to managing/coaching than just buying ready made defenders. Like maybe not just sit deep and play defense against attack.
so you agree with original poster than if mourinho signs a defender and he isnt good enough mourinho has to persist with that player and cant buy another even if we can afford it?Because City have unlimited funds and a manager who they trust completely. Easy question
Yeah, get the feeling it's just not meant to be for Jose.a victory would have changed our season ... maybe.
How many of posters will write this? Subs were excellent. Chelsea didn't create anything. But Jose expects that his defenders can clear hoof balls. But they can't. Because they are shit. And again they cost us points. I am sick of this.The moment we sit back we concede. Wonder when Mou will ever learn
Classless yes. But surely what he did is not technically allowed within the rules?Infuriating end to a good performance.
That Chelsea scumbag of a coach needs sacking, classless cnut.
It is not about luck , they wanted that last ball far more than our players did.
Deliberate provocation
That's the key. 2-2 at Stamford Bridge is a fine result (even though the manner in which we conceded at the death was questionable). It's the losses at places like Brighton and West Ham that are infuriating.
Maybe they don't have the quality? If not at least show some fight and pride. Up until the last two games we have had neither. Funny enough all carry on at the end might actually fire us up even more.
Everything is spot on here. But people just don't want to hear itPeople having a go at Jose for the subs are just dumb idiots. Simple as that. Every manager worth his salt would have made similar subs in that situation. Also we didn't concede because they were able to play through us, we conceded from a deep cross the likes of which our defense should have cleared.
Absolutely gutting way to lose 2 points but overall it was a positive performance.
Infuriating end to a good performance.
That Chelsea scumbag of a coach needs sacking, classless cnut.
Agree mate.A lot of kids in that thread, were giving up completely.
Some said that they will switch off, etc.
Some people have a such a loser's mentality. We go down 1 goal and they give up. WTF!
I hope he pours out a bowl of cereal and realises he's out of milk.
Deliberate provocation
I hope he pours out a bowl of cereal and realises he's out of milk.
Definitely. If the equalizer comes earlier but it's always crushing with the last kick.1 point at the bridge in this poor run? Can't complain. Feels like a loss tho...
Think if we had even got one experienced class CB in it would made a difference. Someone who can also organise a defence. Our defence looks all over the place sometimes. Just think if we were secure at the back we would commit more people forward.Baily had a good first 3 months. Since then, he's been injured/average/terrible.
Baily is living off of past reputation (of only 3 months).
You can't have a go at him for the subs but it's his fault we were not there in the 1st half. Chelsea were there for the taking but we only caused problems in the 2nd half.People having a go at Jose for the subs are just dumb idiots. Simple as that. Every manager worth his salt would have made similar subs in that situation. Also we didn't concede because they were able to play through us, we conceded from a deep cross the likes of which our defense should have cleared.
Absolutely gutting way to lose 2 points but overall it was a positive performance.
So sackable offense it is.Classless yes. But surely what he did is not technically allowed within the rules?
Mike Dean