Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
everyone (incuding the EU) knows a no deal brexit is the worst possible outcome for everyone.
It's not ideal, and it probably wouldn't have happened, but it certainly isn't the doomsday scenario is is often made out to be. From my perspective, the worst possible outcome is one that sees us remaining in the EU - all other outcomes are better.
 
Public numbers seem overwhelmingly in her favour. Is this anything to go by?
 
Sorry, but it is quite obviously possible. In fact it requires effort and infrastructure to put a hard border in place, whereas it requires nothing at all not to.

Not having a hard border in a 'hard' Brexit scenario would certainly throw up a lot of issues, I suspect more around the movement of goods than people, but putting one in place also creates problems. The UK and Irish governments could decide that they'd rather be managing the problems arising from not having a hard border than managing the ones from putting such a border in place.

The movement of people is the least of the problems, you cannot have an open border between countries with different regulations. Why won't the UK take responsibility for their actions?
You would have no problem with not having a border with India for example?

There are borders between Norway and Sweden, between Switzerland and France/Germany/Italy. Even Liechtenstein has a border.
 
Are you serious? How does any of what you've written equate with "taking control of our borders"?
I do believe the Irish border is a very specific issue, and I don't think many people have Ireland in mind when they talk about "taking control of our borders".

You are right though if you suggest that the absence of a border in Ireland would present a back door for migration from the EU to the UK. Personally I don't see that as a big problem as I'm not sure there would be a huge incentive for EU nationals to move to the UK post-Brexit. The bigger problem would arise from the movement of goods, but this looks to me to be much more of an issue for the EU than for the UK.
 
Public numbers seem overwhelmingly in her favour. Is this anything to go by?

In what aspect? If you're referring to Tory MP's coming out to support her, it's a blind ballot - so they can say one thing and do another.
 
It's fine to have an opinion, I just think the blanket statement about the intelligence of Brexiteers is unfair.

There are some who voted simply in the spirit of xenophobia, the DM reading, Tommy supporting, OMFG GET THE FOREIGNERS OUT types. Nobody doubts their level of intellect.

...but there are those who have the right to fundamentally question whether or not their country remains part of a bureaucratic titan with increasing powers, often with ambitions beyond the customs union we voted into. There was no public say on Maastricht after all.
I only see the first group masquerading as the second, to be honest. When they're pressed about anything about the EU they escape into their "I don't know the details" safe zone. That second group may exist, but it's a tiny minority that are both informed about the EU and against it.
I'm staggered also by the lack of socialist/left wing voices who traditionally oppose the EU, Corbyn is one of them (Galloway another, sadly) and I'm often left scratching my head as to why a number of intelligent, progressive and liberal people are so enchanted by a mammoth right wing organisation.
Q.E.D

Escape the right wing organisation into the safe hands of the tories? :lol:
 
Public numbers seem overwhelmingly in her favour. Is this anything to go by?
Around 158 Tories have said publically they will back her and that's enough to win.

But it's a secret ballot so if less than that number end up voting in her favour it goes to prove what a dishonest, snakey party of back stabbing twats they are.
 
The movement of people is the least of the problems, you cannot have an open border between countries with different regulations. Why won't the UK take responsibility for their actions?
You would have no problem with not having a border with India for example?

There are borders between Norway and Sweden, between Switzerland and France/Germany/Italy. Even Liechtenstein has a border.
There are reasons why there isn't a hard border between the UK and Ireland that go way beyond trade and customs regulations, as I'm sure you know. The same issues do not apply in the examples you provide (or, as far as I know, anywhere else in the world).

It's not an issue of the UK taking responsibility - in a post-Brexit world, why should the UK, which generally favours free trade anyway, put in place infrastructure solely to uphold EU customs regulations?
 
It's not ideal, and it probably wouldn't have happened, but it certainly isn't the doomsday scenario is is often made out to be. From my perspective, the worst possible outcome is one that sees us remaining in the EU - all other outcomes are better.

Umm what ?

So keeping the status quo is worse than decimating our economy?
 
Public numbers seem overwhelmingly in her favour. Is this anything to go by?
Yes. Most of the the public, whether leave or remain want this done. And they want it done in the least painful manner with the closest relationship with the EU.

Plus the fact that the only person in Parliament that appears to be working their proverbial arse off in the interest of the country appears to be Theresa May.

All the rest are lazy, gutless, self-indulgent tossers who have done sod all but stand around pointing fingers and uttering mealy-mouthed complaints.

The public know that and will remember that when election time comes.
 
There are reasons why there isn't a hard border between the UK and Ireland that go way beyond trade and customs regulations, as I'm sure you know. The same issues do not apply in the examples you provide (or, as far as I know, anywhere else in the world).

It's not an issue of the UK taking responsibility - in a post-Brexit world, why should the UK, which generally favours free trade anyway, put in place infrastructure solely to uphold EU customs regulations?

It's not EU regulations , it's WTO regulations that the hard brexiters seem to have fallen in love with. Thus if the UK have an open border with the EU/Ireland they have to have an open border with every other WTO nation, MFN rules, which rather defeats the object of 'taking control of our borders' when the UK will have no control of any border with any country.

But even this does not take away the problem of certification , standards and the mountains of paperwork a hard brexit will entail. Any movement of goods both ways will be a logistical nightmare.
 
It's not ideal, and it probably wouldn't have happened, but it certainly isn't the doomsday scenario is is often made out to be. From my perspective, the worst possible outcome is one that sees us remaining in the EU - all other outcomes are better.

What an extraordinary view you have. Honestly the mind boggles.
 
Bored of the whole thing to be honest. We look like a bunch of clowns for electing these lot.
 
It's not ideal, and it probably wouldn't have happened, but it certainly isn't the doomsday scenario is is often made out to be. From my perspective, the worst possible outcome is one that sees us remaining in the EU - all other outcomes are better.
John Redwood has opened an account.
 
I get that she's in a difficult situation but thats one of the worst PMQ performances from her. Again treating parliament as party politics
 
DuNtox6W0AINQFK.jpg
 
Umm what ?

So keeping the status quo is worse than decimating our economy?
I can only speak for myself, but I accepted that there would be an economic impact from Brexit in the short to medium term, but voted for it anyway. I'm also sure that 'decimating our economy' is a massive overstatement of the impact of a hard Brexit.

I dislike the EU as an organisation, and fervently wish we were not a part of it. I retain some hope, but not much to be honest, that my wish will soon come to pass.
 
John Redwood has opened an account.
Another tosser.

All these guys fall into the classic research method trap where they only listen to and read anything that confirms their theory.

Redwood believes fervently that all swans are white, but he's never been to New Zealand.
 
I can only speak for myself, but I accepted that there would be an economic impact from Brexit in the short to medium term, but voted for it anyway. I'm also sure that 'decimating our economy' is a massive overstatement of the impact of a hard Brexit.

I dislike the EU as an organisation, and fervently wish we were not a part of it. I retain some hope, but not much to be honest, that my wish will soon come to pass.

In what ways has the UK being in the EU been detrimental to your life? I assume it has been considerable given your views.
 
I can only speak for myself, but I accepted that there would be an economic impact from Brexit in the short to medium term, but voted for it anyway. I'm also sure that 'decimating our economy' is a massive overstatement of the impact of a hard Brexit.

I dislike the EU as an organisation, and fervently wish we were not a part of it. I retain some hope, but not much to be honest, that my wish will soon come to pass.

The Uk will almost certainly not be a member of the EU on 30th March.
 
I can only speak for myself, but I accepted that there would be an economic impact from Brexit in the short to medium term, but voted for it anyway. I'm also sure that 'decimating our economy' is a massive overstatement of the impact of a hard Brexit.

I dislike the EU as an organisation, and fervently wish we were not a part of it. I retain some hope, but not much to be honest, that my wish will soon come to pass.

Just wondering what actual issues do you have with the EU which are factual and not just propaganda pushed?

Also decimating our economy would be 5% decrease it is predicted that brexit will cause a near 15-20 % decrease. Do you really thing that is small - medium? That would straight up mean millions lose jobs. Lastly it is logically not possible based on facts and evidence that the UK could ever get their economy back up to pre brexit levels if we left. So we would have less money regardless of how well we recover.
 
Much as I dislike the Tories, this thought did cross my mind the other day.

She's just a scapegoat for the whole Conservative party incompetence.

If you ever feel pangs of sympathy for a Tory creeping up on you reach quickly for a copy of their voting record.

Theresa May is a cnut.
 
In what ways has the UK being in the EU been detrimental to your life? I assume it has been considerable given your views.
The EU has not, as far as I know, had any detrimental effects on my life, and may even have had some positive ones (in terms of convenience, and perhaps materially).

My objections to it are more political and philosophical. I don't see the EU's direction of travel as being compatible with my views of what a nation state should be, or my views on how we should be governed by democratic institutions that are accountable to the people they serve. To me, the economic arguments are secondary.
 
Considering how many Tory MPs stood up and attacked May and her government over the last week there must be a lot within the 158 who have publically declared their support.

I'm fed up of this shit, on the one hand this is what would have happened if Corbyn had called a no confidence vote but at the same time i strongly feel this government can't continue. It's a farce that can't be resolved largely due to the backwards DUP
 
The EU has not, as far as I know, had any detrimental effects on my life, and may even have had some positive ones (in terms of convenience, and perhaps materially).

My objections to it are more political and philosophical. I don't see the EU's direction of travel as being compatible with my views of what a nation state should be, or my views on how we should be governed by democratic institutions that are accountable to the people they serve. To me, the economic arguments are secondary.
What views are these?
 
The EU has not, as far as I know, had any detrimental effects on my life, and may even have had some positive ones (in terms of convenience, and perhaps materially).

My objections to it are more political and philosophical. I don't see the EU's direction of travel as being compatible with my views of what a nation state should be, or my views on how we should be governed by democratic institutions that are accountable to the people they serve. To me, the economic arguments are secondary.

Here's hoping that if no deal does pass the consequences to you are anything but philosophic.
 
The Uk will almost certainly not be a member of the EU on 30th March.
I wish I shared your confidence. I predict that the Article 50 declaration will be reversed by parliament quite early in the new year, initially on the pretext of allowing more time for negotiations (which is pointless), but in reality as a prelude for a second referendum.
 
I always laugh whenever a Tory scaremongers with the predictable ‘Jeremy Corbyn is the biggest threat to this country!’, all while they’re completely running the nation into the country and fragmenting it into utter chaos and division.