I don't think anyone is writing off Spurs? More that they are just, well, Spurs, and aren't going anywhere in particular - inert at a time when they have their best xi since the 80's and so many of the top clubs in England are going through a rocky patch - and it very much looks like the possibility is that they dwindle away rather than take any motions onward or upward from here.Aye, a lot of this strikes me as quite reactionary. And it tends to be the way Pochettino's regarded. When they're in form and we're performing poorly he's a must-have, someone we should go all out to get. But when we perform well and they hit a bad patch (as all teams do) suddenly that's flipped on his head and he's suddenly a limited manager in spite of the job he's done at Spurs.
For what it's worth I am leaning more and more towards Ole being given the job, but anyone writing off Spurs on the basis of a patchy spell of form that hasn't even bad that bad is being a bit silly. He's doing a superb job by virtue of even being at the same level as clubs like Chelsea, Arsenal and us considering the resources he's got. Cup competitions ultimately always factor in a lot of luck and can be hard to win - thus far Klopp's won less at Liverpool than Dalglish did in his second spell, but no one would argue Klopp's been worse for Liverpool than Dalglish because he managed to win a League Cup final against Cardiff in a year where they were dreadful domestically. Similarly Juande Ramos is Spurs' most successful manager on paper in the past 15 years or so, but he was also arguably their worst.
Most of the caf seem to think Kane is the best striker in the world. Eriksen is rated as one of the top midfielders in the country; only City would turn their nose up at Son; Alli is highly rated, too and they have one of the best actual defensive units in the league and, ironically, the amount of time they've been together as a team with no reinforcement, gives them a level of synergy and understanding that only Klopp and Guardiola, by virtue of being given time to build their teams how they want, can match. A superb job it was, initially, but with the state of the other clubs, Spurs in third is right where they should be. Winning the league ism't likely without investment, but I don't think that's been held against Poch by many except in Leicester's campaign (the same time Wenger got slaughtered for the same thing) and whilst the downturn remains in place for Arsenal and even a resurgent United, top 4 qualification is seen as a given for Spurs.
His record in away games against top 6 opposition is being scrutinised more with each passing season; the way they go out of domestic cups, too - even if they're not going to field their best xi - it's not a surprise when they fold, which begs the question of can they only perform with their very best xi out there?
Spurs and Pochettino are both against the clock for differing reasons - is their crowning glory going to be fighting for 3rd, whilst other big clubs are discombobulated and having some of the most coveted players in the league at their disposal? Or should we be asking what happens from here or before Chelsea and United get their act together or Spurs start selling their star turns or(!) are beaten by father time as that backline becomes aged and fragile?