Brexited | the worst threads live the longest

Do you think there will be a Deal or No Deal?


  • Total voters
    194
  • Poll closed .
Fiona Onasanya seems to be very popular again today after casting her vote last night for that majority of 1.
Complete with ankle tag, another Parliament first, I believe. I love the fact that the Brexit press are saying that it was her "aye" vote that was the deciding one for the Cooper Bill.
 
Quite.
Yes everyone should have a vote, do not dispute that.
What I don't agree with is that something so complex as Brexit is put to the people, where most people don't understand a tiny fraction of it and even people who have a greater knowledge don't know everything.
I get that, although it might be seen as an argument against a people's vote now. :)
 
I am praying beyond belief that May and Corbyn agree how to take a deal forward... but bring it back to the country. i.e. this is the deal the 2 parties will agree on, but over to you guys to confirm you want it.

Then they can pin it on us if the country still votes to leave. Or blame us if we have now changed our mind. Because I just can't see her wanting to be the prime minister / party that drags the countries economy down like that. It would be easier to blame the country. Would you really want to go in the history books for that??

I can dream.

I don't think May cares about that.
Her mission is to execute Brexit, how she does it and what the consequences are are immaterial to her, in her mind she would have succeeded if Brexit happens.
 
Complete with ankle tag, another Parliament first, I believe. I love the fact that the Brexit press are saying that it was her "aye" vote that was the deciding one for the Cooper Bill.

To be fair, it was the deciding one.
Point to abstinence all you like.
 
It's not about debuting guess to the is or stupid. It's about having clear positions and arguements, articulating it well to the dumb and intelligent, and actually trying to combat the misinformation that happens (which lets face it, we don't do)... A more informed public is the way forward. Not holding my breath thow...

So what if you got shouted down? Facts and compelling arguements would put an end to that swiftly.... What were those arguements that you posted? Let's see why you got shouted down.

Nope. Been there & done that once so I’m out - in both senses of the phrase ;)
 
I get that, although it might be seen as an argument against a people's vote now. :)

Well, yes but , do two wrongs make a right. In any case in my view the government and indeed parliament are responsible for the wellbeing of the country so for the wellbeing of the UK there is only one course of action.
 
You really think there will be an extension?

I think they'll only do it if a referendum is involved.

Hard to tell as certain voices are always more negative than others but I think we've exhausted their will on any other extension but perhaps they'll want to avoid no deal enough that they'll put up with our shit for a bit longer.
 
I think they'll only do it if a referendum is involved.

Hard to tell as certain voices are always more negative than others but I think we've exhausted their will on any other extension but perhaps they'll want to avoid no deal enough that they'll put up with our shit for a bit longer.

Referendum plus a definite direction maybe. I'm not convinced all 27 would agree though.
You know what would happen if they gave a timetable for certain actions, parliament would pick the one that kicks the can the longest. I think they know their games by now.
 
There’s more Remain support in here than Leave.

I haven’t seen a post put forward a convincing argument for Leave yet.

I doubt there are many independent neutral observers, contributing to the discussion, who are willing to be convinced though.
 
Interesting watching the Bill going though the Lords today. Brexiter peers have submitted loads of amendments in an attempt to filibuster, which are being swiftly voted down by the majority (who are Remainers).

This will go on and on throughout the course of the day. This tactic was expected and it seems Remainer peers have made sure they can stay for as long as it takes.
 
Interesting how the same Leave supporting cnuts in parliament who hark on about democracy endlessly are quite happy to subvert it with arcane parliamentary procedure any time it suits.
 
Why did you ask then ?

I wanted to get a general feel for the Remain/Leave split at the time of, and prior to, the referendum against that which exists now, as the latter is likely to have been influenced by events since the referendum.
 
Last edited:
To be fair, it was the deciding one.
Point to abstinence all you like.

Or we could point to any of the other 312 votes that were of equal importance. Kenneth Clarke cast the deciding vote. Caroline Lucas, representing twice as many voters as the entire DUP cast the deciding vote. John Mcdonnell legged it back from his MRI scan to cast the deciding vote.....
 
On a side note do you think the current state of politics inspires the young to look at it as a potential career path? Or the opposite?
 
I doubt there are many independent neutral observers, contributing to the discussion, who are willing to be convinced though.

Honestly I have been waiting for 2 years, many conversations with leaver family members, heard every brexit politician. Yet not one has given me a genuine cohesive reason why leave would be beneficial without just straight out lying about things.
 
Honestly I have been waiting for 2 years, many conversations with leaver family members, heard every brexit politician. Yet not one has given me a genuine cohesive reason why leave would be beneficial without just straight out lying about things.

Every rational leave voter I know has stated they would like to see a return of ascendency to British Courts, where they can't be overruled by European Courts. Personally I think it's a fair argument; it's not an economic argument but fair all the same, in my opinion.
 
Every rational leave voter I know has stated they would like to see a return of ascendency to British Courts, where they can't be overruled by European Courts. Personally I think it's a fair argument; it's not an economic argument but fair all the same, in my opinion.

Yeah. People often say the leave vote had its roots in immigration concerns, but I think sovereignty of courts, judiciaries and lawmaking had a good deal to do with it.
 
Yeah. People often say the leave vote had its roots in immigration concerns, but I think sovereignty of courts, judiciaries and lawmaking had a good deal to do with it.
Did it balls :lol:

I love this retrospective changing of the reason people voted Brexit to try and justify it. Farage didn't stand in front of a poster showing concerns about the sovereignty of British courts.

People can make whatever excuses they like about the vote being about sovereignty/economic benefits/protest against the elites but when you look at the language being used before the vote and the general fear of immigrants/Muslims etc taking over the country then it's obvious what the real reason was.
 
Did it balls :lol:

I love this retrospective changing of the reason people voted Brexit to try and justify it. Farage didn't stand in front of a poster showing concerns about the sovereignty of British courts.

People can make whatever excuses they like about the vote being about sovereignty/economic benefits/protest against the elites but when you look at the language being used before the vote and the general fear of immigrants/Muslims etc taking over the country then it's obvious what the real reason was.

This attitude is exactly part of why we have ended up in this situation. Instead of acknowledging and understanding people's (legitimate) issues with the EU, they are simply branded as bigoted racists and therefore their stance hardens even further and we end up in a situation where we are facing down the barrel of a no-deal Brexit because those who voted leave have been alienated enough by the losing side that they will argue this is what they wanted to begin with.

I'm not denying that immigration isn't one of the main factors; May's 'red lines' are there for a reason, because it will play well with the ERG and large parts of the leave voters. But there are genuine issues with the way the EU conducts itself and the amount of say it has in certain jurisdictions of member states' sovereignty and to deny that is wrong, even if they are misconceptions.
 
Did it balls :lol:

I love this retrospective changing of the reason people voted Brexit to try and justify it. Farage didn't stand in front of a poster showing concerns about the sovereignty of British courts.

People can make whatever excuses they like about the vote being about sovereignty/economic benefits/protest against the elites but when you look at the language being used before the vote and the general fear of immigrants/Muslims etc taking over the country then it's obvious what the real reason was.

That's a pretty sweeping statement.

The official vote leave campaign doesn't represent everybody who voted to leave. For me, it has always been about sovereignty, not some superior nationalism or xenophobia. In fact, there's even a socialist/left wing case for local rule, the SNP being a good example of that, and traditional eurosceptics included old Labour and Corbyn himself. Is he a racist?

Yes, there are plenty of xenophobic, narrow minded leavers, but to say that there aren't a decent number who simply didn't want to be part of a superstate project simply isn't fair.
 
Depends how you look at it. You are correct in that they ostensibly displayed extremely shallow knowledge of international trade and the European Union.

But if you look at the case of Davies, he received a large consultancy fee from JCB, a company owned by a prominent Brexiteer and another large consultancy fee from another company (I can't remember which).

If you look at Rees-Mogg, he's a co-founder of Sommerset Capital Management. A company that opened a fund in Ireland in reaction to Brexit and that warned its investors of the economic damage Brexit could cause.

I'd say in the case of the former, he's just a politician of the most cynical type, looking to feather his own nest financially and in terms of his career. In the case of the latter I think Brexit is an ideological position for him but he's economically Brexit-proof in the extreme and maneuvering without any empathy for those that are not. Typical Tories you might say but I don't think they're stupid.
Oh when the slimey toads come to making money off the back of the ordinary people they are certainly masters. That’s why it should be revoked, it’s nothing more than a con job from the main protagonists JRM, BoJo, Farage, Banks - all up to their necks in making dirty money out of it all and fcuk the ordinary man if he gets screwed over, loses pension and ends up with a higher cost of living.
 
This attitude is exactly part of why we have ended up in this situation. Instead of acknowledging and understanding people's (legitimate) issues with the EU, they are simply branded as bigoted racists and therefore their stance hardens even further and we end up in a situation where we are facing down the barrel of a no-deal Brexit because those who voted leave have been alienated enough by the losing side that they will argue this is what they wanted to begin with.

I'm not denying that immigration isn't one of the main factors; May's 'red lines' are there for a reason, because it will play well with the ERG and large parts of the leave voters. But there are genuine issues with the way the EU conducts itself and the amount of say it has in certain jurisdictions of member states' sovereignty and to deny that is wrong, even if they are misconceptions.

What do you mean by the way the EU conducts itself and at which part of member states sovereignty does it have?
 
That's a pretty sweeping statement.

The official vote leave campaign doesn't represent everybody who voted to leave. For me, it has always been about sovereignty, not some superior nationalism or xenophobia. In fact, there's even a socialist/left wing case for local rule, the SNP being a good example of that, and traditional eurosceptics included old Labour and Corbyn himself. Is he a racist?

Yes, there are plenty of xenophobic, narrow minded leavers, but to say that there aren't a decent number who simply didn't want to be part of a superstate project simply isn't fair.

I'm fairly certain brexit would still have passed if you took out all those who only voted because of sovereignty. That doesn't work in reverse.
 
What do you mean by the way the EU conducts itself and at which part of member states sovereignty does it have?

Well for me specifically I mean the lack of transparency in the way the EU works and decides things, though I acknowledge that this also in part down to my ignorance when it comes to the European Parliament.

With regards to sovereignty, I was talking largely about the Courts, where the European Courts take precedence.