Reparations discussion

Ok but for real, who are the people that would feel a way if they were informed that for a few years their taxes may be used to aid reperations versus some other thing you wouldn't like to pay for? What are your backgrounds?
I would absolutely feel a certain way because a) my parents weren't slaves but I'm still adversely affected by the history of slavery b) reparations aren't a cure for the rampant discrimination and the destruction of black communities and families as a result of slavery. The sins of slavery cannot be forgiven by a glorified income tax check. If black people in America think this we are doomed forever.
 
It's amazing that people are horrified paying out reparations but weren't fazed by the government cutting the corporate and estate taxes from the superwealthy.
I agree that it's too late to tax or blame something on people so many years removed from it, but looking from a purely practical perspective it would make a lot of people feel better about their country's history... most of the money like the basic income or other types of economic stimuli plans would simply be reinfused into the economy... whereas reducing the taxes on the rich continues to widen the the chasm of income inequality.
 
I would absolutely feel a certain way because a) my parents weren't slaves but I'm still adversely affected by the history of slavery b) reparations aren't a cure for the rampant discrimination and the destruction of black communities and families as a result of slavery. The sins of slavery cannot be forgiven by a glorified income tax check. If black people in America think this we are doomed forever.
Personally I wouldn't feel any type of way, but okay. So what would you prefer?
 
It's amazing that people are horrified paying out reparations but weren't fazed by the government cutting the corporate and estate taxes from the superwealthy.
I agree that it's too late to tax or blame something on people so many years removed from it, but looking from a purely practical perspective it would make a lot of people feel better about their country's history... most of the money like the basic income or other types of economic stimuli plans would simply be reinfused into the economy... whereas reducing the taxes on the rich continues to widen the the chasm of income inequality.
You’d have to assume that the government would end up recouping much of what it paid out through sales, property, and other taxes. I think ultimately it could lead to an economic stimulus.
 
Personally I wouldn't feel any type of way, but okay. So what would you prefer?
Posted it yesterday:

Black people in America don't need financial reparations (and it's pretty much impossible to determine who deserves it given the intermarrying). They need reparations of infrastructure and autonomy in their own communities.

Things better than reparations:
- legalizing marijuana AND revoking any federal or state level marijuana related conviction
- replacing many of of the public schools (middle and high school) in low income neighborhoods with trade schools
- Universal healthcare for any lower middle class family
- Setup police forces of people native to that community (implement quotas)
- Require a significant portion of sales taxes collected in inner city neighborhoods to go towards infrastructure projects
- Higher taxes for "leech" businesses in low income neighborhoods (pawn shops, liquor stores, payday lenders, etc)
- Freeze property tax increases in low income neighborhoods
- Tax breaks for residents of low income neighborhoods who want to start a business in that neighborhood

I'm against any reparation that doesn't go directly towards the rebuilding of black communities. Anything else is treating the symptom and will fail.
 
Posted it yesterday:



I'm against any reparation that doesn't go directly towards the rebuilding of black communities. Anything else is treating the symptom and will fail.
All of that would be incredible. It's as tough a sell as reperations though... If not tougher.
 
Posted it yesterday:

I'm against any reparation that doesn't go directly towards the rebuilding of black communities. Anything else is treating the symptom and will fail.
Even just the two would be better/easier than reparations.

Regardless, reparations won't even happen. Someone will sue, it will go to the SCOTUS, be ruled unconstitutional, and that will be the end of.
 
You’d have to assume that the government would end up recouping much of what it paid out through sales, property, and other taxes. I think ultimately it could lead to an economic stimulus.
Probably a thread derail, but how much longer can US justify they can recover through taxes when debt just keeps increasing? Some wants a wall, Others want reparations, it's all spending and recovery through tax is a euphemism for let's forget and it's someone else's worry down in future.
 
Probably a thread derail, but how much longer can US justify they can recover through taxes when debt just keeps increasing? Some wants a wall, Others want reparations, it's all spending and recovery through tax is a euphemism for let's forget and it's someone else's worry down in future.
How many trillions upon trillions of unpaid taxes and hoarded money are there though? That would help pay for a lot right off the bat.
 
Surely they are all straight forward things to do irrespective of reparations. Saying those are part of or effect of reparations doesn't make it palatable.
They aren't straightforward because they require government spending. Just like reparations. I'd rather my congressman argue for these things than reparations. It's a better use of time and resources and would be far beneficial than a glorified income tax check for a limited period of time. If black Americans aren't able to build and maintain infrastructure to get an education, learn trades and open businesses in their communities, the economic effects of any short term boost to income will be short-lived. This is what slavery stole, so it's very relevant to any discussion about reparations.
 
Probably a thread derail, but how much longer can US justify they can recover through taxes when debt just keeps increasing? Some wants a wall, Others want reparations, it's all spending and recovery through tax is a euphemism for let's forget and it's someone else's worry down in future.
It’s quite literally not a euphemism. The money will end up being spent somehow and will somehow end up taxed.
 
Off Shore money. Yes.

Transferring money from the wealthy to ordinary people will in the long run help reduce the National debt. The economy grows when wages grow.
I always try to explain to people just how much money is kept out of circulation by people whose wealth is in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars. It’s an uphill struggle.
 
So go run and be dead. We've seen you before and we'll see you again. feck off.
:lol:

I was just using a Kenynes quote for ''fun''

The long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead. Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons they can only tell us that when the storm is past the ocean is flat again.
 
Last edited:
They aren't straightforward because they require government spending. Just like reparations. I'd rather my congressman argue for these things than reparations. It's a better use of time and resources and would be far beneficial than a glorified income tax check for a limited period of time. If black Americans aren't able to build and maintain infrastructure to get an education, learn trades and open businesses in their communities, the economic effects of any short term boost to income will be short-lived. This is what slavery stole, so it's very relevant to any discussion about reparations.

Slavery (and, Jim Crow, because everyone seems to be missing this point regarding what happened after slavery) stole much more than that.

You vastly underestimate what a big sum of money would do for the African American population. In terms of being able to establish equity, own investments or houses. Which is why in 1865 the remedy proposed wasn't "fix the slave quarters" (which is kind of what you're proposing), it was "40 acres and a mule". Fixing the infrastructure does not address the wealth gap between white Americans and black Americans.
 
The MSM propaganda is effective.
and hate to say it, many people are basically stupid.
Here's the thing, mate: I'm (rightly) known in my family as someone who's very slow to catch on, somebody who's not swiftly perceptive at all - it can, literally, take me years to realise something which others view as obvious. All that is true, and the (affectionate) family criticism is completely justified. Given that, how come even I can see the lies for what they are? And if I can see it, why can't my fellow 'stupid' people do so?
 
Here's the thing, mate: I'm (rightly) known in my family as someone who's very slow to catch on, somebody who's not swiftly perceptive at all - it can, literally, take me years to realise something which others view as obvious. All that is true, and the (affectionate) family criticism is completely justified. Given that, how come even I can see the lies for what they are? And if I can see it, why can't my fellow 'stupid' people do so?

Ignorance can be either innocent or deliberate. And then you have the other side of the coin which is motivated by selfishness, lack of empathy, racism, or some other shit.
 
Slavery (and, Jim Crow, because everyone seems to be missing this point regarding what happened after slavery) stole much more than that.

You vastly underestimate what a big sum of money would do for the African American population. In terms of being able to establish equity, own investments or houses. Which is why in 1865 the remedy proposed wasn't "fix the slave quarters" (which is kind of what you're proposing), it was "40 acres and a mule". Fixing the infrastructure does not address the wealth gap between white Americans and black Americans.
Spot on.
 
Here's the thing, mate: I'm (rightly) known in my family as someone who's very slow to catch on, somebody who's not swiftly perceptive at all - it can, literally, take me years to realise something which others view as obvious. All that is true, and the (affectionate) family criticism is completely justified. Given that, how come even I can see the lies for what they are? And if I can see it, why can't my fellow 'stupid' people do so?

I should not have used the word stupid.

I know decent people who always vote Republican who certainly are not stupid. But they believe that stuff said on the telly cannot be lies. Just because. they don't understand much of it is opinions'. In fact it is propaganda that even the person pushing it does not believe.

Just look at this brexit fiasco.
Its always about Corbyn this or that.
and all the while, the Tories are slitting people's throats.

the problem is there is no accountability nor are there proper journalists who push back on what is said on the media.
 
Slavery (and, Jim Crow, because everyone seems to be missing this point regarding what happened after slavery) stole much more than that.

You vastly underestimate what a big sum of money would do for the African American population. In terms of being able to establish equity, own investments or houses. Which is why in 1865 the remedy proposed wasn't "fix the slave quarters" (which is kind of what you're proposing), it was "40 acres and a mule".
We aren't living in 1865 and that is a weird analogy given present day conditions. To focus, only on slavery ignores the 150+ years of racial discrimination and systematic racism that has had, IMO an equally devasting effect on black Americans (i.e. I would argue the prison industrial complex in the US is just as sinister as slavery)

You vastly underestimate how nearly impossible it is to do the bolded with out education, skills, or infrastructure.

Fixing the infrastructure does not address the wealth gap between white Americans and black Americans.
I'm sorry but I think you're wrong on this.
- 1Education is strongly correlated with wealth
- There have been studies that have shown a link between wealth inequality and skilled labor.
- 2Infrastructure investment increases productivity which should have a positive effect on economic growth

There is lots of economic data on the above:
1Relationship between education/wealth
2Relationship between infrastructure and productivity (pg 9)
Saving behavior by age/race (pg 19 starts the graphs)
Education gap/ race
Labor force statistics by race

As an aside, since it seems like you honestly care, read this short paper:
http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/images/nbhds_exec_summary.pdf
What are the properties of areas that improve upward mobility? Within a given commuting zone, we find that counties that have higher rates of upward mobility tend to have five characteristics: they have less segregation by income and race, lower levels of income inequality, better schools, lower rates of violent crime, and a larger share of two-parent households.

We also find that areas with a larger African-American population tend to have lower rates of upward mobility. These spatial differences amplify racial inequality across generations: we estimate that one-fourth of the gap in intergenerational mobility between blacks and whites can be attributed to the counties in which they live.
The above is pretty sobering.

EDIT: some of my citations were incorrectly labeled
 
Last edited:
To focus, only on slavery ignores the 150+ years of racial discrimination and systematic racism that has had, IMO an equally devasting effect on black Americans
Did you miss the first sentence of adexkola’s post?
Slavery (and, Jim Crow, because everyone seems to be missing this point regarding what happened after slavery) stole much more than that.