What exactly was the drivel?That's the one who was on BBC Breakfast this morning talking drivel.
What exactly was the drivel?That's the one who was on BBC Breakfast this morning talking drivel.
What exactly was the drivel?
My hope is that in a decade or so, their dwindling circulations would have dissapeared entirely.Yeah it doesn’t surprise me.
I mean I'd make the point that her achievements in spite of her academic drawbacks in her early life are a testament to her suitability compared to exclusively privately-educated Bullingdon snobs who've not worked a days honest work, but I'd be wasting my energy.
Eventually I can only hope we reach a point of diminishing returns with the public getting exhausted with the Tories and the compliant media's character assassinations, all while they're force fed more years of crippling cuts, economic instability, rising costs of living and a soon to be decimated health service.
Can't be bothered to fact check that, but surely it is no more tiresome than any of the three-word slogans Johnson has on rotation?She must have repeated "Trump, Johnson and Farage" about 16 times, very tedious.
Every single one of her answers got those 3 into the answer.
Can't be bothered to fact check that, but surely it is no more tiresome than any of the three-word slogans Johnson has on rotation?
Sorry that was lighthearted. I had assumed you were exaggerating. Did you actually count the number of times she mentioned each of those three words in each of her answers? Well done, if so!Yeh, I'm deliberately lieing, ffs!
And, did I say Johnson was any less tiresome? Since we are discussing Rayner, not Johnson, why would Johnson come into the discussion?
How about saying, "but not a tedious as Klopp or Pep", while you are at it?
Corbyn was repeating much the same mantra this morning. Obviously, this constant linking of the three for public consumption is deliberate.
Probably for the people who would never think of voting Tory but may end up voting for the Brexit Party. Also the whole "Thatcher on steroids line" thing he came out with.
There's no doubt that part of what's directed at Corbyn is absolute nonsense (of which that Sun photoshop stunt is a recent example).This has already been discussed to death here but it seems to come up everytime someone tries to paint Corbyn as some despicable Jew-hating reincarnation of Hitler.
But that's not the whole context either, isn't it?As with everything context is key - this wasn’t Corbyn waving the flags of Hamas and Hezbollah and patting them on the back for their respective ideologies, but rather a call for them to come to the table and discuss a roadmap to peace. Because frankly the alternative would be to double down on the status quo and see more lives taken by the ensuing violence in the Middle East.
I make the point here I'm forced to make in practically every discussion of this sort: if the benchmark for criticizing racism, misogyny, antisemitism, homophobia etc. is someone being a rabid individual hater, we can all go home. It's impossible to tackle this stuff on that basis. In reality, any sort of hatred against a group is a case of a smaller violent avantgarde, relying on a much larger camp of ideological enablers and apologists (who often don't see themselves as such).The choice of words was arguably unfortunate and you can argue in poor taste, but does it constitute irrefutable evidence of him being a rabid anti-semite?
Or it's simply because the soundbites in question happened in the immediate aftermath of the announcement that the Brexit party had changed their strategy of not cooperating with the Conservatives literally a week or so after Trump publicly suggested Farage form a pact with Johnson on LBC. With that in mind, it reads more like natural point of discussion based on a timeline of recent events than some grand pavlovian strategy.Corbyn was repeating much the same mantra this morning. Obviously, this constant linking of the three for public consumption is deliberate.
in case anyone thought being jewish would protect a left wing candidate from weaponized antisemitism claims
Republicans, lobbyists and Trump specifically have been trying to get this "the left is anti-semitic" trope going in the States for a while now after seeing how successful it's been over here but it's not really gained much steam due to the majority of media outlets out there refusing to play ball.
The Ilhan Omar spectacle actually ending up backfiring massively though as it rallied her local base and ultimately pushed the Democrats to circle their wagons around her. Plus the amount of traction it gained on the right was more of a product of their penchant for Islamophobia than people actually internalising this false notion that the left is inherently anti-semitic all of a sudden.I think it has more to do with american jews being more left leaning. But they still did it successfully with Ilhan Omar.
The Ilhan Omar spectacle actually ending up backfiring massively though as it rallied her local base and ultimately pushed the Democrats to circle their wagons around her. Plus the amount of traction it gained on the right was more of a product of their penchant for Islamophobia than people actually internalising this false notion that the left is inherently anti-semitic all of a sudden.
Honestly people have lost their minds.
Honestly people have lost their minds.
Honestly people have lost their minds.
That's odd, I click the link and all I get is just the video but no criticism
Honestly people have lost their minds.
It's pronounced 'Hey Zeus'.Jesus!
Oh wait...![]()
It's pronounced 'Hey Zeus'.
It's pronounced 'Hey Zeus'.
Bit confused I didn’t realise there was a Jewish way to pronounce Epstein. Thought it was more dependent on one being German and the other being more Russian.