Sweet Square
ˈkämyənəst
of course
Same, my dad's in his early 70s and still smokes plenty, has a bad cough at the best of times. Just gonna be constant stress for the next few months.Getting very scared for my parents now. Both over 60, both smoked all their lives until 2-3 years ago, Dad has heart issues. This would kill them.
They're taking precautions but it's my generation with our "Be grand" attitude that'll do the damage.
In the UK you're entitled to dependents leave
RUSSIA BEYONDWhat on earth are you talking about?
https://www.rbth.com/lifestyle/331816-russia-coronavirus-pandemic
RUSSIA BEYONDGet Fox News sources in here, lads!
I'm sorry bit they really don't need a spin to sell news right now. You told me it was almost pointless just yesterday and defended the delay and accused other countries of gesturing with these same measures.
Christ if you lot arguing about timing truly meant one day later would be fine then god bless you what a waste of time.
On the ignore list you go.
Ah yes the Daily Mail has a vest interested in bringing down this tory government. Come on you're just shit posting, right now(Well at least I hope you are)This is prime time for them, just like when the transfer window opens in football.
Why are you so intent on believing every word from a newspaper(s) anyway?
Ah yes the Daily Mail has a vest interested in bringing down this tory government. Come on you're just shit posting, right now(Well at least I hope you are)
Russia Beyond is state funded:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_Beyond
Ah yes the Daily Mail has a vest interested in bringing down this tory government. Come on you're just shit posting, right now(Well at least I hope you are)
Pretty much every outlet is censored by the government in Russia. It doesn't mean they give false information at all times. Sure, it's censored but again I've no reason to disbelieve, my close friends and family.
It’s about timing. I imagine the government’s preferred strategy was to hold out longer, but they have been undermined by various institutions making unilateral decisions and the domino effect has started. There’s no consideration that the FA and PL have a better handling on this. They are just self protecting their staff, their stakeholders and their reputation, which is understandable.If this is the case why have they only banned them now ? What brand new information have they received within 24 hours that has told them there would now be an impact on services, when it's been clear for weeks that services are always going to be under a huge strain due to the virus. Again does it not worry you that the FA has a better reading on the virus than the British government ?
Do a lockdown now, and probably you won't ever reach hundreds of thousands of people getting infected, or you reach it much slower, giving the medics and the scientists a chance.So in your scenario, you lockdown now when just a few thousand people are infected. In a few weeks when hundreds of thousands are infected, are you continuing the lockdown further, or now telling people to commence life again?
Presumably you are locking down further at which point millions are infected, but people now are mentally fatigued, many households are fecked financially and/or out of resources, and infrastructure has begun to fail. There’s now civil unrest. Are you telling people to continue locking down because the worst shit is yet to come as we still have not reached the point where 10+ million infected at once?
You can’t lock down for 3 months and this shit is going to get worse and worse throughout that period, even with the most stringent lockdowns possible.
The health aspects of COVID-19 are one thing, the economic ramifications for individuals, for normal working class and lower middle class families are even more precarious. In six months time we will look back and realise the elderly in end of life care already were not the biggest victims of all this, but families who have to pick up the pieces are. I say this as someone who has five elderly grandparents of various states who I do not see all making it through this year. They will have it light compared to those who lose their job, their home, their business, all whilst battling ill health.
FFS, even if this really works, it is absolutely tragic. And there are so many assumptions there for this to work, if just one of them is incorrect, the entire house gets burned.
Batman gambit.FFS, even if this really works, it is absolutely tragic. And there are so many assumptions there for this to work, if just one of them is incorrect, the entire house gets burned.
What a loss. Now I am going to miss out on links to sources on how Russia is perfectly handling the coronavirus crisis published by entities openly funded by the Russian government.On the ignore list you go, not least because of you spouting bollocks in this thread, by parroting everything Vallance said, whom was picked by Johnson and Cummings. Bye now.
The Tory government is in for 5 years, they don't care. It's full on selling newspapers at this point.
I posted a tweet on the last page showing the Daily Mail praising Johnston and the tories while they were telling their staff the government advice is no longer adequate(Basically lying to their readership who are mostly likely to die from this virus). When the Daily Mail is saying it's a u turn then you know the tories have fecked up.Are you seriously suggesting we should use the Daily Mail as a source?
Do a lockdown now, and probably you won't ever reach hundreds of thousands of people getting infected, or you reach it much slower, giving the medics and the scientists a chance.
China had 80k cases a few weeks ago. They have 80k cases now. It can clearly be managed (up to some degree and some time).
I know this. What I mean is that, if this plan works, 1 million British people die (66.4m * 0.7 * 0.02 = circa 1m). If it doesn't, several million more die.Everything in science is assumptions. The battery in your phone/laptop will be assumed to last a certain period of cycles for example, based on rigious tests of other batteries. The assumptions are usually not the issue, its whether you understand the implications of your assumptions and take those implications into account. I remember some worst case scenarios being discussed early in the thread so it seems that those implications are at least being acknowledged and discussed.
I will make a bet with you of Italy reaching assumed millions of cases. It won’t be confirmed cases because obviously testing won’t keep up, and it isn’t already. Make it ethical and £20 to a relevant charity. This is one bet I hope I lose.Do a lockdown now, and probably you won't ever reach hundreds of thousands of people getting infected, or you reach it much slower, giving the medics and the scientists a chance.
China had 80k cases a few weeks ago. They have 80k cases now. It can clearly be managed (up to some degree and some time).
Not necessarily. What if they keep the restrictions for a month after no new cases are confirmed, and then gradually start lowering them, while still keeping a closed border?It will come back in China as soon as the restrictions are lifted, the UK are trying to make sure most of the cases happen over summer.
I posted a tweet on the last page showing the Daily Mail praising Johnston and the tories while they were telling their staff the government advice is no longer adequate(Basically lying to their readership who are mostly likely to die from this virus(. When the Daily Mail is saying it's a u turn then you know the tories have fecked up.
Oh, it will most certainly will. Just that it will reach slower than the current projections.I will make a bet with you of Italy reaching assumed millions of cases. It won’t be confirmed cases because obviously testing won’t keep up, and it isn’t already. Make it ethical and £20 to a relevant charity. This is one bet I hope I lose.
The situation is far worse in Europe now than Hubei. Hubei you could work outwards from a core of initial cases. Europe the cases are everywhere and the whole continent is almost infected with hotspots growing.
Well your friends and family will only know what is going on around them and also will likely only be fed news from state funded outlets, i.e. news the government approves. So whilst your friends/family seem to be safe (which I am glad about) it doesn't really mean much about the current state of Russia. Like I said, its hard to say either way, they could be doing very well or could also be struggling like many other countries.
I don't care what the Daily Mail says though.
Come on you're just shit posting, right now
cheers. It's been a brilliant conversation.
It was a internal email and reported on by a FT journalistSo you use the daily mail as your sources of information and have the cheek to say other people are shitposting![]()
I almost want people here who unnecessarily stock up on things causing empty shelves to contract it, nevermind an asshat like Trump.Am I a bad person for wanting Trump to have the virus?