It's worth noting just how many children will be born in December btw. We can name them the 'Covid Colony'.
No this is not similar to WW2 or the Holocaust
Jesus fecking Christ.
The Wuhan WainsIt's worth noting just how many children will be born in December btw. We can name them the 'Covid Colony'.
feck me. I have a cousin who has asthma. I have another cousin who has lung problems since he was 15 years old.
This really is full of stereotypes. We have never been 'mass testing'. In fact Germany is much more reactive than proactive compared to other european countries.
And our population is anything but disciplined. Just yesterday - in Cologne a City where gatheringsare forbidden, the police had to call off a 600(!!!) people gathering at the Rhine.
Hundreds of thousands (millions?) of people in U.K have Asthma... I think the role of Asthma in this (and the number of people who have it) has gone under the radar really.
This virus immediately targets the lungs.
Many PL footballers have Asthma!
Are you quarantining due to precaution or have you had symptoms? Are there any local facebook support groups or anything like that?day 10 of isolation and I’m spiraling truth be told. Moved to this country ten months ago so don’t have a lot of close friends here, so already had a bit of loneliness kicking in.
I have ps4/Netflix/books/work from home. But I’m crumbling here. I won’t go out with friends and put others at risk - following the gov advice here, but I’m spiraling
I don't know, during the blitz the UK had people walking through streets physically enforcing window blackouts. When it's a case of survival, we'll listen to any type of authority.
No this is not similar to WW2 or the Holocaust
Think the change in thread title was precisely because of posts like this.Without drastic measures, it is. Imperial College study forecasted the number of deaths to 90m if the virus is left alone.
The economy is going to be totally mauled.
Ain't no virus that would keep me from a nice glass of kölsch along the Rhine, either!
I am hardly saying any bullshit. It is the most detailed study we have had so far, which forecasts 2.1m Americans dying if we only mitigate the problem, and 4m if we do nothing and leave it as the flu. Interpolate the numbers for the world, and you get what I am saying.Think the change in thread title was precisely because of posts like this.
Without drastic measures, it is. Imperial College study forecasted the number of deaths to 90m if the virus is left alone.
The economy is going to be totally mauled.
Over what timescale?I am hardly saying any bullshit. It is the most detailed study we have had so far, which forecasts 2.1m Americans dying if we only mitigate the problem, and 4m if we do nothing and leave it as the flu. Interpolate the numbers for the world, and you get what I am saying.
Italy showed a higher influenza attributable excess mortality compared to other European countries. especially in the elderly.
We estimated excess deaths of 7,027, 20,259, 15,801 and 24,981 attributable to influenza epidemics in the 2013/14, 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17, respectively.
Within a year.Over what timescale?
Exactly. I've been mentioning this to friends for a week or two, people losing their mind over 2000 cases or so in the UK. I would imagine that number is closer to 100,000, it's just not causing them any problems. Re-iterates the need for social distancing and protecting those that are vulnerable.
Some people in here and others on Facebook who can't tear themselves away from their precious pint in the local should take heed. It's not all about you.
I said that left alone will reach those numbers. Yes, their numbers for UK and US very much matched, so you can extrapolate for the entire world (with some degree).I think they modeled that doing nothing (treating it like the flu) would result in 2.2 million deaths rising to nearly 4 million if we really did feck all. Some bloke then extrapolated this to the worlds population and came up with 90 million deaths. The maths is correct but it wasn't meant to be a prediction of what will happen, just of what could happen if we did nothing. And we are doing things.
Still very fecking scary mind.
I think they modeled that doing nothing (treating it like the flu) would result in 2.2 million deaths rising to nearly 4 million if we really did feck all. Some bloke then extrapolated this to the worlds population and came up with 90 million deaths. The maths is correct but it wasn't meant to be a prediction of what will happen, just of what could happen if we did nothing. And we are doing things.
Still very fecking scary mind.
WowWithin a year.
Full study: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/im...-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
I said that left alone will reach those numbers. Yes, their numbers for UK and US very much matched, so you can extrapolate for the entire world (with some degree).
Obviously we are doing something, but it is still scary. For example, mitigation only reduced the number of deaths at a quarter (so 1m in US, 260k in UK), and suppression with then total removal of restriction was the same as doing nothing.
The current strategy most states are doing lowers it to a few thousands for US/UK (I think that is extremely optimistic as we see from Italy, so it is gonna be few tens of thousands), but that requires a lot of restrictions to stay in place until the vaccine comes.
They were supposed to do mitigation (herd immunity) but when the study was completed the number of deaths was too high to accept it, so switched to suppression. Supression does not necessarily mean full lockdown.I read a summary of the Imperial report on Twitter. I recall there being 3 scenarios - doing nothing, mitigation, and outright surpression.
I'm not sure which category the United Kingdom comes under - (mitigation I guess?) - because we only have government advice and no complete ban on leaving the home. People are still going to bars/cafes/restaurants.
Wasn't that also them just extrapolating the mortality rates to apply to the global population? Large portions of the world won't have access to anything like the resources and treatment available to the richest parts of the world.
Or am I missing something?
I am hardly saying any bullshit. It is the most detailed study we have had so far, which forecasts 2.1m Americans dying if we only mitigate the problem, and 4m if we do nothing and leave it as the flu. Interpolate the numbers for the world, and you get what I am saying.
It also is conservative in many cases, using a significantly lower fatality rate than the one given from WHO. It is also precisely the study that the UK government is using to make their policy (thus while they gave up on herd immunity).
The silliness was more from 'this is just the flu' brigade who thankfully seem to have disappeared in the last week.
Interesting.Within a year.
Full study: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/im...-College-COVID19-NPI-modelling-16-03-2020.pdf
Overall, our results suggest that population-wide social distancing applied to the population as a whole would have the largest impact; and in combination with other interventions – notably home isolation of cases and school and university closure – has the potential to suppress transmission below the threshold of R=1 required to rapidly reduce case incidence
That is certainly a way of looking at it, yes. Which is why I've always taken the death rate with a pinch of salt. Personally, as a person who as asthma and often gets pretty wheezy with seasonal flu-like infections I'm a bit uneasy.Isn't this a really good thing?
Serious cases that end up in hospital are being tested, but if there's a substantial number of people who have got it/have it who simply have slipped under the radar (an absolute certainty in the UK at least) then does it not suggest that the virus is significantly less deadly than feared?
They have denied that explicitly.To me, that’s the only thing that explains the death rate in Germany. They’re considering the death as from a pre-existing condition rather than from the virus that exacerbated it.
Which country?day 10 of isolation and I’m spiraling truth be told. Moved to this country ten months ago so don’t have a lot of close friends here, so already had a bit of loneliness kicking in.
I have ps4/Netflix/books/work from home. But I’m crumbling here. I won’t go out with friends and put others at risk - following the gov advice here, but I’m spiraling
I mean... yeah. They’re not gonna say “ahhhh ya got me!” if somebody asks.They have denied that explicitly.
It's not 2). We are basically not testing at all.
Our 3 year old daughter with 39,3 fever and dry cough was not able to get tested - and we live in the middle of Cologne, one of the hardest hit cities in Germany.
I personally think our gov is hiding stuff.
Yeah... but this is not China. There would be leaks and a huge public outrage. And, it would be difficult to orchestrate because it‘s not controlled by a central structure. Every county reports the numbers independently.I mean... yeah. They’re not gonna say “ahhhh ya got me!” if somebody asks.
To me, that’s the only thing that explains the death rate in Germany. They’re considering the death as from a pre-existing condition rather than from the virus that exacerbated it.
If anything, that chart indicates you test a lot more than Italy so your ratios should be more accurate.In the death cases that I know more of (regional newspapers) that was just not the case. And despite some users who like conspiracy theories that does just not match to the usual German overly correct prussian character.
In Germany the first cases from January were pretty well tracked. The second wave came with travellers, from skiing hotspots in Austria etc. Mainly with young people!
![]()
That was after the first 648 cases about ten days ago. If you take some days between discovery and death...
All of e.g. Bavarias 15 or 18 death cases were between 67 and 99.
I actually expect Germany to cope better with the virus then most of the other countries because of the organisation, social structure, discpline and health system.
And yes, there is always some people that do not catch the seriousness of the situation.
Werewolf is far too apt. Villagers are blind as bats, have no clue what's going on and who is evil (infected) as they keep themselves hidden (asymptomatic).In a lighter side, we should probably arrange more forum games on redcafe since there would be many people on lockdowns.
Wolves? Any other forum games that's interesting? Perhaps a gaming session?
So a covid themed game then?Werewolf is far too apt. Villagers are blind as bats, have no clue what's going on and who is evil (infected) as they keep themselves hidden (asymptomatic).
Everyone banging on about collaborating and fighting for the greater good despite (again) not having the faintest idea how to go about it.
There's a chap running around with a limited stock of test kits trying to hit the jackpot with his one daily seer check.
Worst of all, most players end up dead.