Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 25,804
Lockdowns aren't a switch that turns the virus on and off. The UK has been over a month into their lockdown and they are still posting daily deaths deep into the hundreds. It would be an extremely slippery slope and drastic measures would probably have to be introduced based on very early warning signs. I don't think that would be feasible. Once you remove measures it will be a lot harder to introduce them again and when you tell polticians and the public "well, hospitals are still empty, we don't really record a significant number of deaths, but we have had a worrying uptick in our random testing sample, so we have to introduce strict measures again" they won't accept it and even if they do the first time and it works out they'll call you a scare-monger, because nothing happened and ignore you the next time.
Gradually easing measures one step at a time in order to find an equilibrium where we can coexist with the virus until a cure or vaccine is found sounds like a more realistic approach to me. And even in this case it seems like people are really quick to get careless again and think one easement of restrictions means things are good now and other measures will (have to be) dropped quickly as well.
Perhaps it's a question of perspective because i see a second wave as inevitable in the UK. It might be a couple of months but i don't foresee us keeping it sufficiently level so you're going to end up needing a lockdown anyway.
I'd personally expect people to react worse to another lockdown akin to this one than saying up front we'll lockdown again in N months for N days if these set of assumptions prove true.
It also sets a message that this isn't over which i think isn't hitting home right now.