I agree. People need stuff fixed and it can be done with care.
Well, sure. If you start from the position of "going in and out" and having two have "two or more tradesmen travelling together" then you are setting them up to fail. There's plenty of sole traders or small groups of workers, who can complete jobs whilst practising social distancing from each other and their clients.
There has never been any directive in the UK to stop tradesman working in the private homes of others, as far as I am aware:
People seem to be think we are trying to reduce the risk of transmission of the coronavirus to zero. That is not the goal and never has been. We're essentially trying to limit the rate of transmission by eliminating as much unnecessary social contact as possible. What we each define as "unnecessary" will differ however, hence conversations like this.
Indeed, I had no hot water for a week during the early stages of the lockdown. The fact a plumber came, fixed the issue and maintained a safe distance whilst still putting himself at risk was amazing. I gave him a good tip and he went on to the next urgent job. Without that I would have had months with no hot water.
Electricians, plumbers and the like are at the top end of essential for house owners.
Seems so. Even in the early "herd immunity" approach (if it existed), it would've been wise to somewhat control the spread. As someone mentioned earlier, international arrivals introduce a massive variable for modelling the local system.Boris said we would be 'taking it on the chin' as a supernation. They grossly underestimated its effect
Agree on the tracking. But I don't see how quarantine would've served no purposed until community cases vastly outweighed international cases - it's a straightforward way of isolating cases from critical countries (China, Italy, Iran, later Spain) and others while forcing a personal lockdown on only relatively small numbers of the population. Not that it would've prevented national lockdown, but any practical improvement of the initial conditions would reduce the length of lockdown.It could have been a mistake early on, but once the level of infection within the population is close to the level of infection in travellers coming to the UK, it would serve no purpose unless it is part of a tight track and trace model. Why obsess over international travellers any more than those travelling regionally or locally?
I think we've been screwed since January in eventually requiring a lockdown, as we don't have the infrastructure needed to run such a vast track and trace model as many Asian countries do. We saw our tracking and tracing become overwhelmed very quickly. We are currently building that infrastructure now, and you'll likely see greater scrutiny on international travellers once we have our domestic situation under control.
think we've been screwed since January in eventually requiring a lockdown, as we don't have the infrastructure needed to run such a vast track and trace model as many Asian countries do.
For emergencies, absolutely. It wouldn’t be ideal if they’r cracking on doing as many jobs as normal.
I’ve had a personal experience of this. There’s a dripping tap in my kitchen. I need to replace the tap but it’s plumbed in in a really awkward location which will be a mighty faff to get at. I’ve been meaning to get a plumber round to do it. But that’s not an option right now.
“Someone should test that”Why don't we just inject soap into our bodies?
Control of borders innit. Can do what they likeDoes anyone know the scientific reason why the UK has at no stage imposed a (self) quarantine on international arrivals?
Perhaps the belief is that lockdown has essentially enforced this quarantine (I disagree), but I don't understand why it wasn't imposed in the earlier stages of the transmission. There's no getting around the fact that this is how the spread began.
Can you go into thisI was on a webinar today with WHO re framework for reopening schools
Imagine Johnathan Woss was PMIn hindsight I think they should have chosen a better letter than R for the infection rate considering Boris says it every fourth word anyway.
Seems so. Even in the early "herd immunity" approach (if it existed), it would've been wise to somewhat control the spread. As someone mentioned earlier, international arrivals introduce a massive variable for modelling the local system.
Agree on the tracking. But I don't see how quarantine would've served no purposed until community cases vastly outweighed international cases - it's a straightforward way of isolating cases from critical countries (China, Italy, Iran, later Spain) and others while forcing a personal lockdown on only relatively small numbers of the population. Not that it would've prevented national lockdown, but any practical improvement of the initial conditions would reduce the length of lockdown.
I know it's easy to say this in hindsight, but it seems like such a fundamental tactic, even if just a precaution while gathering more information about transmission and severity. An unnecessary gamble was taken IMO.
They started by saying that they have studied effects on children from past events such as Ebola outbreaks.Can you go into this
The plumbers and sparkies are working here for emergencies but two blokes can't travel in the same vehicle, they have to have their permission forms with them and they're being stopped constantly, according to our pal who's a builder here. As you say, you can't call them for a dripping tap. Our kitchen strip light died about a month ago and I've had to set up spare standard lamps in there as a make-do.For emergencies, absolutely. It wouldn’t be ideal if they’r cracking on doing as many jobs as normal.
I’ve had a personal experience of this. There’s a dripping tap in my kitchen. I need to replace the tap but it’s plumbed in in a really awkward location which will be a mighty faff to get at. I’ve been meaning to get a plumber round to do it. But that’s not an option right now.
Boris kept congratulating UK for the amazing job we've done in lockdown, as if we've endured the toughest set of personal constraints and delivered the best results in the world.Just to recap: a grand total of zero questions at today's briefing about the government meeting Matt Hancock's testing figure. What a sorry state of scrutiny.
Just to recap: a grand total of zero questions at today's briefing about the government meeting Matt Hancock's testing figure. What a sorry state of scrutiny.
To be fair DHSC are claiming 82k tests were carried out on 54.5k people yesterday. Obviously that ain't 100k but it's still a big improvement if it continues.
Is it really that dangerous once you get admitted to hospital? Christ.
Which is nonsense obviously, unless you believe New York, Belgium, The UK, hell even Ireland “willingly“ let a bunch of people die.
Is it really that dangerous once you get admitted to hospital? Christ.
Is it really that dangerous once you get admitted to hospital? Christ.
Is it really that dangerous once you get admitted to hospital? Christ.
Hasnt that always been this issue? It hardly effects most but if it gets to the stage you need hospital treatment your in trouble.
No you’re fecked once you’re admitted. You must have to be genuinely on deaths door.
Holy shit. That’s a huge sample size too. 33% dead and 17% still sick, so the mortality rate could get higher.
Some Irish docs published a study today looking at the way covid fecks up our blood clotting system. Apparently the risk is 3 to 4 times higher in caucasians than Chinese. So this could cause mortality outside China to be a lot higher than the % we’ve been assuming based on Wuhan data.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjh.16749
Still though. One in three hospital admissions ending up dead is horrific.
A virus that is more virulent in none Asian’s. That’ll give the conspiracy theorists some ammunition.
I mean, if the virus is widespread and your healthcare system is over capacity, you will be a lot more selective in hospital admissions, which means only the sickest get hospitalised, which means you'll have a higher percentage of deaths in the hospital as you would if you were in control of the epidemic.
Holy shit. That’s a huge sample size too. 33% dead and 17% still sick, so the mortality rate could get higher.
Some Irish docs published a study today looking at the way covid fecks up our blood clotting system. Apparently the risk is 3 to 4 times higher in caucasians than Chinese. So this could cause mortality outside China to be a lot higher than the % we’ve been assuming based on Wuhan data.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjh.16749
Still though. One in three hospital admissions ending up dead is horrific.
I looked into this more after you mentioned it on the weekend, and it has me quite nervy/worried about this again. It's good to see it's starting to get more attention though because it could really mess us down the line