SARS CoV-2 coronavirus / Covid-19 (No tin foil hat silliness please)

More testing is going on in a day than back then in a week. The number of deaths is still on dozens per day, while in April it went to almost a thousand.

Of course it is bad and it is going to get worse before it gets better, but I do not think it is gonna be as bad as in spring (talking about the number of deaths and people in ICU, not the number of official infections).
If these deaths are still in the dozens next month then we can call it a mild second wave vis-a-vis Italy. However the people catching and testing positive now could wind up dead next month.
 
If these deaths are still in the dozens next month then we can call it a mild second wave vis-a-vis Italy. However the people catching and testing positive now could wind up dead next month.
It might be bad, and there might be another lockdowns but I would be surprised if it ever gets as bad as in last spring. Checking just the number of confirmed infections is totally pointless when the number of testings has increased so much since then. Back then, even with clear symptoms and potentially having been in contact with confirmed cases was not guaranteed to get a test, while now you can easily get a test without any symptoms at all.
 
It also stops hospitals reaching maximum capacity, so reduces deaths.

But you are right, the government should have prepared better during the last lockdown.

Yes - I'm not saying it's not going to be necessary or useful.

The time needs to be used productively. I don't know what's happening with track and trace in Wales, but it'd need to be used here to get things running properly, otherwise it's just kicking the can down the road and crippling businesses.
 

Pretty good watch. Thanks for that.

What it boils down to is Spain depends so much on tourism that the risk was deemed to be worth taking in opening up the country, which obviously failed big time and sending students back to school has basically caused this second outbreak to be so high which should of been avoided.

The jury is still out if they're trying their own model or if the government is as useless as suggested in the video. Whatever the reason Madrid was/is the epicenter and was left far too late to at least try and control the virus.

From 2 days ago we're back once again to all bars and restaurants being closed but I don't think it's going to reach the complete lockdown restrictions imposed at the start of the pandemic because basically Spain can't afford it.
 
Pretty good watch. Thanks for that.

What it boils down to is Spain depends so much on tourism that the risk was deemed to be worth taking in opening up the country, which obviously failed big time and sending students back to school has basically caused this second outbreak to be so high which should of been avoided.

The jury is still out if they're trying their own model or if the government is as useless as suggested in the video. Whatever the reason Madrid was/is the epicenter and was left far too late to at least try and control the virus.

From 2 days ago we're back once again to all bars and restaurants being closed but I don't think it's going to reach the complete lockdown restrictions imposed at the start of the pandemic because basically Spain can't afford it.
How are Spanish population behaving in general?
Is their rebellion or are people willing to accept the restrictions?
 
How are Spanish population behaving in general?
Is their rebellion or are people willing to accept the restrictions?
In general the people are accepting the restrictions. No one (at least in barcelona) is going out without masks not only for their own safety but also because its impossible to go into shops, use public transport etc etc without them. There were demonstrations from people in the hospitality business but there were no reported problems.

Spain can be quite volatile as proved last year in Catalunya with the political prisoners riots but I don't think it's ever going to reach those heights with covid.

There's a lot of friction between Catalunya and Madrid so I suppose it all depends on what the Spanish government think "what's best" for the Catalan people.
 
The problem with Spain it goes deeper than that. Life is unaffordable and thats the reality of things. This causes among the 2 most dens cities in europe (Barcelona the first), people living in smaller spaces sometimes without windows. At the same time, lots of people are working payed under the table what don't allow them to access to economic help and can't afford to test positive and go work regardless.

Being true that there is friction between Catalunya and Spain, currently there is mostly nothing on that and is most right against left. The spanish government is left (oficially because is mostly centered) and the local Madrid government is extreme right - right coalition and they are contradicting themselves constantly making any direction and strategy impossible to be trusted. Spain is a cainite country
 
Oh we at least agree on the economy. It's completely fecked. We are in deep trouble. Let's be honest, it's like 97 or more percent of people recover from this virus. The statistics are out there in various places (too lazy to go find them now),. My problem is in light of that recovery rate, aren't the measures disproportionate when we consider the low percentage of deaths? The deaths are horrible, but unfortunately, apart from protecting the vulnerable as much as you can, the rest of us have to get on (with precautions), but we have to live.There are people out there with cancer snd other diseases who will most certainly die because they can't get treatment. I consider cancer to be far more deadly than this virus (as bad as it gets for a small percentage). I've been reading about suicides and mental health issues, and folks losing their livelihood on account of this lockdown. It's doing more harm than good. We need to have a balance. I suspect though the government is loving having such autonomy over our lives, not to mention awarding lucrative contracts to their cronies to supply equipment and handle track and trace, which is a bloody disaster.

It is a mess.

Deaths are far from the only issue as lots of people get long term problems and in any case the death rate will skyrocket if ICU's become over whelmed. And 3% of the UK's population is just shy of 2 million people. This is a health problem and should first and foremost be dealt with as such. The economic costs that entails should then be mitigated. You shouldn't start from the $ value and work back for ethical reason's imo. Overwhelmed hospitals will also prevent people with things like cancer getting the treatment so things would be worse, not better. And economically controlling the spread also makes sense.
chart1-L--374f0062efb797a80baf443fe2929be2.svg
 
Last edited:
Places hit hardest in the northern spring are those copping it again now on average.

chart2-L--a1cfe69e1e5e0c291078482a003dbeed.svg
 
Hospital admissions rising in most European countries
chart1-L--af009d74d793bd023262a518c6d028c5.svg
 
Peru and Ecuador have the highest excess deaths rates among countries producing comparable data: Measures of excess mortality* by country, during Covid-19 outbreaks

chart3-L--7348f32de1c86d588bfadc68841feb33.svg
 

India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.

Hopefully the lack of a severe winter keeps them low.

South Africa is in a somewhat similar boat.


UK and Spain have the dual hit of high deaths and a major contraction. Not sure if either country can take another quarter of contraction. The US actually hasn't done so terribly for a country of its size.

Thanks for sharing these charts wibble.
 
India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.

Hopefully the lack of a severe winter keeps them low.

South Africa is in a somewhat similar boat.


UK and Spain have the dual hit of high deaths and a major contraction. Not sure if either country can take another quarter of contraction. The US actually hasn't done so terribly for a country of its size.

Thanks for sharing these charts wibble.

All from a Tweet someone else shared earlier. The main site is here https://ig.ft.com/coronavirus-global-data/ and there is more to be released every day this week.
 
India has been forced to open up for economic reasons, curious how the numbers will look over the coming months.

The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.
 
The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.

Even if the actual death count was 100% higher, it would still be very low. India is too chaotic a democracy with lots of independent media for the number to be a thousand % higher.

The initial lockdown while mismanaged was very stringent, so they never had the high fatalities and hospital loads the epicenters in Europe, US and South America had in March and April, and their high case count was in August and September by which point therapeutics had improved.

That said, I would hazard a guess that the 24% GDP contraction probably killed more people living below the poverty line. These are tough choices for countries like India and South Africa.
 
We are turning Warsaw national stadium into a temporary hospital and morgue. Other large cities will do the same with their arenas soon.

At the same time others are on the streets screaming ‘don’t be a slave, leave home and live’, ‘drop the mask and breathe’. Twice over weekend I’ve been told that I have been brainwashed by TV and it’s just a much, much milder flu, only doctors are all getting paid heavy money to put covid in death certificates.

This is beyond a mess and it’s only getting started.
 
The fear is that massive under-reporting could be why their deaths looks so good. I hope not of course.

I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.

So even though a population 3x smaller, you would expect more people to die from covid there if it spread to the entire population. And because those under 70 represent just 3% of the Indian population vs. 11% of the US population, and then you add in the other risk factors like obesity etc., it's just the case that while the virus is spreading in a semi-controlled manner, the at-risk populations in India are much less likely to be exposed to it because they occupy a much smaller segment of society. Which theoretically should also make them easier to shield, but then you've got the cultural and economic factors working against that.
 
I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.

So even though a population 3x smaller, you would expect more people to die from covid there if it spread to the entire population. And because those under 70 represent just 3% of the Indian population vs. 11% of the US population, and then you add in the other risk factors like obesity etc., it's just the case that while the virus is spreading in a semi-controlled manner, the at-risk populations in India are much less likely to be exposed to it because they occupy a much smaller segment of society. Which theoretically should also make them easier to shield, but then you've got the cultural and economic factors working against that.

I don't think anyone is suggesting a conspiracy. Just that a country the size of India with a large part of the population rural and poor may well have inconsistent reporting of covid deaths.
 
I don't think anyone is suggesting a conspiracy. Just that a country the size of India with a large part of the population rural and poor may well have inconsistent reporting of covid deaths.

Yeah, it's surely a factor, but it is the case that India should have much fewer deaths than countries with similar numbers of cases, and we should expect that to maintain throughout the pandemic. The only way it wouldn't is if there was a massive health system collapse.
 
I don't think you need to look for conspiracies on that one. India just has a very young population. Nearly half the population is 19 or under, who the CDC estimate have a 0.003% mortality risk. So if all of the 463m Indians aged 0-19 contracted the virus, you would "only" expect 13,886 to die. And if the 850m people under 49 (i.e. 83% of the population) contracted the virus the overall mortality figure would still be less than 100k. Those under 49 represent just 64% in the US, or 62% in the UK.
Totally agree with the point.. just pointing out that the data is from a 20 year old census.
Was trying to find some new data.. couldnt find anything.. but saw some comparisons between 2001 and 2011... while then population increased by 20% (wtf?), the 0-6 yr age group was pretty much the same 10 years apart.
And even that data is 10 years old..

India is still a very young country, but I would imagine the 0-19 would be close to 30% of the population right now.
 
More testing is going on in a day than back then in a week. The number of deaths is still on dozens per day, while in April it went to almost a thousand.

Of course it is bad and it is going to get worse before it gets better, but I do not think it is gonna be as bad as in spring (talking about the number of deaths and people in ICU, not the number of official infections).

We are currently at about 10% of Spring when you look at hospitalization and ICU figures, although it is rising quickly. I dont see it getting that bad again because the government is on top of it now, and crucially everybody still remembers March and accepts that sacrifices need to be made.
 
With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.

Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!
 
With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.

Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!

Bloody socialist.
 
With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.

Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!

If you go on benefits you can get all of this, plus you’ll get a new iPhone.
No
 
Wales will go into a national lockdown from Friday until 9 November, First Minister Mark Drakeford has announced.
Everyone will be told to stay at home, while pubs, restaurants and non-essential shops will shut.
 
With no vaccine, at some point the focus will have to be on the vulnerable, they (includes me!) will have to be isolated completely and everyone else get on with their lives.

Personally if the government will pay for me to have a Skysports with box office contract, sign me up to use Netflix, (at no cost) etc. get Sainsbury to deliver my food (I will pay for the food) and deliver my medication, then I will stay indoors (my garden when weather permits) until the vaccine is available.
Oh yes and if its possible, a new (free) widescreen wall mounted HD TV, with surround sound would be nice!

What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.
 
What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.

I swear I have reached the point in this thread when I know who the poster is without checking the username :lol:

Now for Pogue to reply to this and state that we are all fecked.

Anyways, thanks for your posts, Wibble, you are bringing some much-needed positivity into this. I mean it.
 
What makes you think there will be no vaccine. It is looking more and more like when rather than if.

Pfizer is mass producing a vaccine about 10km from my home as we speak. They hope it'll get approved fast. Fingers crossed.
 
What happens in countries where 70% of people will refuse to get vaccines? Do you force them to, or limit their rights to travel abroad etc. if they don't have vaccine certificate?