calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Stop this obfuscation. You fully understand my point. Stop the the fictitious, absolutist generalizations.I've lived around. A lot of my family is from the NY region and half my family live in U.K.
Stop this obfuscation. You fully understand my point. Stop the the fictitious, absolutist generalizations.I've lived around. A lot of my family is from the NY region and half my family live in U.K.
What’s it like having to create alternate realities for the people you respond to?
Stop this obfuscation. You fully understand my point. Stop the the fictitious, absolutist generalizations.
You got it bud.Well there's the problem. You think it's an alternate reality when it's not.
But you didn’t say ‘your not too homogenous classes in SC,’ you said ‘your homogenous classes in SC.’ There is a difference. Even someone as erudite as you should see the difference, you did go to a top 20 university after all.Nope. Schools here are not that homogeneous when it comes to ethnic groups like muslims jews and asians to an extent. It's not as multicultural as New York. There is a black and white diversity which, rightly so, professionals take into account. I also don't think you know what fictitious means btw.
But you didn’t say ‘your not too homogenous classes in SC,’ you said ‘your homogenous classes in SC.’ There is a difference. Even someone as erudite as you should see the difference, you did go to a top 20 university after all.
You weave fantasies out of whole cloth, then try to buttress them with adverbial hyperbole to make them reality. Please tell me how such isn’t fictitious.
Again, that’s not what you originally said. Nor is it true regarding homogeneity in classrooms, religion or ethnic.In comparison to a NY/NJ public school they are homogenous especially in faiths practiced. I'm not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand but I'll ignore your other bait and digs and be patient in getting this across to you.
Again, that’s not what you originally said. Nor is it true regarding homogeneity in classrooms, religion or ethnic.
So, a dig is simply using your own words when responding to you?
Okay. We can debate the semantics on this point, but calling a class ‘homogenous’ implies a very specific thing. It’s just more absolutism, cute wordplay. It’s just more of the same, even with the context given later in the paragraph."Your homogeneous classes in South Carolina might be different but in places like new york and the rest of the world it might surprise you but there are other backgrounds you take into consideration. That's part of an inclusive society. Offending a student with something that clearly is not necessary is not the way."
What I originally said. Implying there are more differences in other parts of the world and the U.S that you take into consideration. A dig is trying to find ways to belittle my opinions without actually sticking to the point.
Okay. We can debate the semantics on this point, but calling a class ‘homogenous’ implies a very specific thing. It’s just more absolutism, cute wordplay. It’s just more of the same, even with the context given later in the paragraph.
I have been consistent in my interactions with you in this thread. It’s not ‘digs,’ it’s using your own words in a rebuttal. Sure, there’s snark involved, but the level of snark is equal to the level of narcissism & ‘high horse-ness’ you display when using such verbiage. You should choose your thread vernacular more appropriately if you do not want it used in a reply.
What is the ‘main issue’ in this thread in your opinion, just so I am clear?Eh? You can use it in a reply? I talked about a classroom being homogenous to which you're reacting as if I talked about the classroom being held on mars? Why is it you struggle to address my point. Instead you find a use of a word and then argue to no ends about that word but are unwilling to discuss the main issue.
What is the ‘main issue’ in this thread in your opinion, just so I am clear?
I’ll refrain from opining again on your absolutist narcissism. Let’s stick to what the ‘main issue’ is.
And the offense caused by controversial religious subjects doesn’t rise to the point to amend secular educational curriculum, especially when discussing relevant topics & history & preparing young minds for the real world (not all high schoolers go to college, after all).Main issue is how people have an irrational blind spot in fostering an inclusive society when it comes to a lot of things religious, especially Islamic. There are a lot of weird justifications for offending students in a school.
And the offense caused by controversial religious subjects doesn’t rise to the point to amend secular educational curriculum, especially when discussing relevant topics & history & preparing young minds for the real world (not all high schoolers go to college, after all).
Glad we were able to lasso back into the main issue.
So you say. Those that are tasked with developing secular educational curriculum think otherwise. Tone down the narcissism.This is not part of the "secular educational curriculum" it doesn't need to be. If you want to get to a destination there is no reason to be fixated on the one road that causes hurt and trauma when you have 10 other paths to get to the same destination. Not in school.
But if you are that then what better way to let an already marginalized group to know "yeah we piss on your religion, imma teach it this way. Take it or leave it"
So you say. Those that are tasked with developing secular educational curriculum think otherwise. Tone down the narcissism.
The cartoon is taught around the world. A few outbursts don’t negate its value in teaching both believers & non-believers alike.
It has been taught multiple times in multiple locations around the world. This is irrefutable.It is not and those that are actually tasked do not think so.
The difference is the Jewish students would most likely just tell you they don't eat pork and move on with their day, while these people are violently going after a teacher for displaying a fecking cartoon. If seing a cartoon of anything messes up your day/life to this level, there are larger issues at play.
Surely you can see the difference here?
Jesus, caricature has been around for ages, and no religious group or other groups of people have had any issues with it until now. It's not a childish tit for tat.
And also, drawing cartoons and drawing this reaction from these extremists might get people to realize how barbaric and insane they are acting around the world, and start to put pressure back on them to be decent human beings?
The theme at the moment? ISIS, War, Humanitarian Crisis, Terror, Violence.
But you are free to draw a cartoon of a fictional character.
I'm just gonna throw this out here, maybe we're starting to have bigoted tendencies because we've lived in this so-called "positive multi cultural society" all our lives, and it's really not very positive at all.
Hmm, I come from a very similar community, and know just what the tensions can be like between white and non-white students in school settings like the school in question. To then show a picture which perpetuates horrendous stereotypes of a vulnerable minority isn't exactly the most appropriate action, is it? The fact it caused severe offence just compounds the issue. A discussion could quite easily have been had without the need to show the picture.How do you know if the behaviour of the teacher was appropriate or not? And what the feck does your last sentence mean?
I hope it's not what it looks like.
Hmm, I come from a very similar community, and know just what the tensions can be like between white and non-white students in school settings like the school in question. To then show a picture which perpetuates horrendous stereotypes of a vulnerable minority isn't exactly the most appropriate action, is it? The fact it caused severe offence just compounds the issue. A discussion could quite easily have been had without the need to show the picture.
Also, what do you think it looks like? The word I was thinking of was idiot, btw. Because you know, showing a picture which had already been the cause of multiple deaths in Paris was a pretty idiotic thing to do. Just like it was in this instance too.
Who had violently gone after the teacher here?
Put pressure on who?
The ongoing theme from Islam and Muslims, 1.8 billions people is "ISIS, War, Humanitarian Crisis, Terror, Violence."?
A fictional charactervery edumacated
Only starting? Justifying being a bigot yeah.
Disgusting. fecking disgusting.
Alright mate, I might have pulled a Shamans here and exaggerated for effect. We don't need to bring back up what happened at Charlie Hebdo though, do we? There's definitely precedence for violence against people that have shown a cartoon of this nature.
I don't know what edumacated means, but sure. I am not justifying anything, I am simply expressing my lived experiences. Why should I put on blinders on and completely disregard the negatives that comes with mass immigration and a multicultural society, and fool myself thinking everything is perfectly fine, when it's clearly not. Some cultures are simply not compatible with others, and I am not saying either one of those cultures are at fault.
What's disgusting, is people like you labelling people for voicing an opinion that isn't exactly like yours.
.
People like me, labelling? Are you fecking stupid?
Me lived experience of my house getting graffited on, my mum being scared to go safeways because of looks and comments of her headscarf, me getting jumped as a kid by grown men, my dad fighting off white drunk white men who think its funny to chuck food around in his restaurant then be outraged of him not having it.
feck off with your experience, youre right people like you are not compatible with civilised society. Like many others in this thread with their double standards and hyposcricy living in a conpketely different world where they hadnt been the 'other'.
Dont try fecking teach us about how to act or feel, we are here because our resources built this fecking country.
Im British because i was born here and its my right, i dont need to be compatible with you.
Who had violently gone after the teacher here?
Put pressure on who?
The ongoing theme from Islam and Muslims, 1.8 billions people is "ISIS, War, Humanitarian Crisis, Terror, Violence."?
A fictional charactervery edumacated
Only starting? Justifying being a bigot yeah.
Disgusting. fecking disgusting.
To then show a picture which perpetuates horrendous stereotypes of a vulnerable minority isn't exactly the most appropriate action, is it? The fact it caused severe offence just compounds the issue. A discussion could quite easily have been had without the need to show the picture.
Also, what do you think it looks like? The word I was thinking of was idiot, btw. Because you know, showing a picture which had already been the cause of multiple deaths in Paris was a pretty idiotic thing to do. Just like it was in this instance too.
Why should I put on blinders on and completely disregard the negatives that comes with mass immigration and a multicultural society, and fool myself thinking everything is perfectly fine, when it's clearly not. Some cultures are simply not compatible with others, and I am not saying either one of those cultures are at fault.
What's disgusting, is people like you labelling people for voicing an opinion that isn't exactly like yours.
@shamans seriously bro why you bothering. The intention here isn't to exchange perspectives, it's to enforce one. Ironically.
No idea where this 'trying to change curriculum' came from. Who's trying to do that, since when has Charlie Hebdo cartoons been a vital component of a secondary school RE lesson about blasphemy. How is education being damaged.
Mental.
So you shouldn’t show it because it could get you killed? Is that what you say?
Alright mate, I might have pulled a Shamans here and exaggerated for effect. We don't need to bring back up what happened at Charlie Hebdo though, do we? There's definitely precedence for violence against people that have shown a cartoon of this nature.
I don't know what edumacated means, but sure. I am not justifying anything, I am simply expressing my lived experiences. Why should I put on blinders on and completely disregard the negatives that comes with mass immigration and a multicultural society, and fool myself thinking everything is perfectly fine, when it's clearly not. Some cultures are simply not compatible with others, and I am not saying either one of those cultures are at fault.
What's disgusting, is people like you labelling people for voicing an opinion that isn't exactly like yours.
"Some cultures are not compatible with other cultures"
Care to expand?
Is a secular educational curriculum under threat if Muslims simply don't want to see portrayals of Muhammad? Is that an attack on secular education?
Isn't that basically what the discussion is about?
I would imagine what he means is that a culture which values freedom of speech, and in particular the freedom to critizice and mock religion and any other authority might not be compatible with a culture which demands that people refrain from doing just that, unless they want to risk getting killed.
Wow I honestly think some of you are trolling now. He wrote such a long post and that's what you took from it? I knew someone would want to play their angle
This reminds me of the racists here who say "oh so we should change our actions because we're afraid of BLM looting and burning cities?"
Anyway there's no point debating here I believe the crux of the issue is
"We don't care that you care"
I was shocked at how bold the answer is, so didn't even want to continue the conversation. Imagine thinking like that and believing you belong to a modern civilised society.He literally said that it’s idiotic to do because other people are killed because of it.
I was shocked at how bold the answer is, so didn't even want to continue the conversation. Imagine thinking like that and believing you belong to a modern civilised society.![]()
To me, that’s the core of the issue. The particular flavor of religion is an non-sequitur created argument that bogs down the debate. It’s very obfuscating. It causes emotion to be spent on a superficial level without addressing the actual issue.Is a secular educational curriculum under threat if Muslims simply don't want to see portrayals of Muhammad? Is that an attack on secular education?
Isn't that basically what the discussion is about?
I was shocked at how bold the answer is, so didn't even want to continue the conversation. Imagine thinking like that and believing you belong to a modern civilised society.![]()