GMoore23
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 3,579
I just can't get my head around Tuchel wanting this guy. Surely he is an Abramovich signing.
Of all time? Nah. He’s shite but they’ll move him on for something close to what they paid. It’ll probably go down as more of a Di Maria type signing. I still think Coutinho is the worst ever.
His options are limited but I think if he moved again he’d go for 65-70m at least. Inter would probably pay that again.If they move him on for half of what they paid I’d be surprised mate, genuinely.
How much was Coutinho to Barca?
The Inter chairman has openly spoke about how much happier he is with Dzeko.His options are limited but I think if he moved again he’d go for 65-70m at least. Inter would probably pay that again.
Coutinho was 145m I think, of which they’ve recouped nothing and aren’t likely to - Barcelona actually paid him to play for Bayern on loan and he scored in the 8-2 game to knock them out![]()
It's Chelsea, they'll find some way to even make a profit on him.I was saying in the other thread I really don’t see what Chelsea can do here.
He’s the second most expensive signing in PL history and one of the highest paid players in the world.
How do you move him on?!
Yeah but he’s a businessman, I’d expect him to be over the moon at selling someone for 100m and replacing him for nothing. I reckon if Chelsea were prepared to sell, inter would be prepared to talk.The Inter chairman has openly spoke about how much happier he is with Dzeko.
Our best hope is Simeone deciding on him for his annual flop striker signing.
The Inter chairman has openly spoke about how much happier he is with Dzeko.
Our best hope is Simeone deciding on him for his annual flop striker signing.
The best was how adamant a load of people in here were that he's one of the best players in the world.
Some people can't look past stats. That's always the problem here and it never tells the full story.I’ve never known someone have so many drastically competing narratives around them, whilst remaining fundamentally the same player throughout.
Some people can't look past stats. That's always the problem here.
What a time to be alive.The best was how adamant a load of people in here were that he's one of the best players in the world.
Yeah but he’s a businessman, I’d expect him to be over the moon at selling someone for 100m and replacing him for nothing. I reckon if Chelsea were prepared to sell, inter would be prepared to talk.
They are likely in hiding now, but there are people (@adexkola?) that maintain he is a world-class player. He's really polarising.
But (as you've alluded too in fairness) if he knew his place and accepted his limitations he'd be respected as the decent top flight scorer he is/was. The problem is he genuinely believes he's an elite level player which means he will be judged by those standards.At the start of this season, he had 251 goals in 508 appearances. A goal every two games in top flight football.
He has 68 goals in 101 appearances for his country too.
He has his flaws, close control, going absent in big games, a bit of a ego. He makes himself hard to like with his gaffs and insecurity. He also hasn’t got an attractive technical style that draws in admirers.
However, when used properly, he is still an extremely good CF, with a goal record that would be the envy of all but the very best strikers in the world.
Is he elite? No, he’s not. But he is a very good player who has made a very bad transfer at a key point in his career.
It’s sad to see him as the object of ridicule now, but in many ways, he has done it to himself. He needs out of Chelsea yesterday.
But (as you've alluded too in fairness) if he knew his place and accepted his limitations he'd be respected as the decent top flight scorer he is/was. The problem is he genuinely believes he's an elite level player which means he will be judged by those standards.
If you talk like this you have to walk the walk.
But (as you've alluded too in fairness) if he knew his place and accepted his limitations he'd be respected as the decent top flight scorer he is/was. The problem is he genuinely believes he's an elite level player which means he will be judged by those standards.
If you talk like this you have to walk the walk.
Can you give any examples of the 'constant defence' he gets in the media? I haven't seen it.The constant defense this guy gets in the media is truly baffling. He is just awful and offers nothing to a team playing possession style football like Chelsea. He only thrives in counter attacking teams (watch most of the goals he scored with us at inter).
This "he doesn't get enough service" narrative is ridiculous as well absolving his awful game play and just blaming his teammates for it instead, why players like Werner were able to get so many countless chances last year playing the same exact "system/formation" that some consider it to be the main "problem" for Lukaku's poor form? Its because Werner makes runs, at least tries to do something when he is not getting enough touches on the ball like dropping deep and not just stand behind the two opposing team's CBs. The elite strikers that he compared himself to like Benzema, Kane etc also do this all the time why cant he?!
Lukaku's movement is awful, his first touch is awful and isn't even clinical or finishes most of the "rare chances" he gets. To top it all this guys attitude on the pitch is just awful (seen it a lot when he was at Inter).
Its pretty clear that Tuchel doesnt fancy him but maybe because of the price tag and not wanting to fall out with the likes of Marina he has no other to choice but to play him.
Its not full on defense like I implied but more like excuses MOTD yesterday, the weird twitter brigade that are always ready to defend him and instead blame his team mates and Tuchel's "system" or "style of play" and some pundits like Craig Burley on Espn who thinks that Lukaku has to start every game for Chelsea and be played to his "strengths" (he even criticized Tuchel when he dropped him in the liverpool game after he did that dumb interview with Sky Sports Italia)Can you give any examples of the 'constant defence' he gets in the media? I haven't seen it.
I get he mouthed off about United, but I don't get why people hate the guy more than Hitler.
Fair enough. On his day he can look very good and he has scored stacks over the years. He has his limitations, eg his big game record and weirdly being outmuscled at times, but he's more a meh part of our post-SAF era to me.Its not full on defense like I implied but more like excuses MOTD yesterday, the weird twitter brigade that are always ready to defend him and instead blame his team mates and Tuchel's "system" or "style of play" and some pundits like Craig Burley on Espn who thinks that Lukaku has to start every game for Chelsea and be played to his "strengths" (he even criticized Tuchel when he dropped him in the liverpool game after he did that dumb interview with Sky Sports Italia)![]()
7 times, one of which was from kick-off.He's certainly a good striker, certainly not on the level of the likes of Benzema, Kane, Lewa.
I seen a stat where Lukaku touched the ball like 8 times away vs Palace, compared to Kane's 37 away at City. That echelon of strikers is just another level above Lukaku, as much as Lukaku wants to talk about himself being on their level.
But (as you've alluded too in fairness) if he knew his place and accepted his limitations he'd be respected as the decent top flight scorer he is/was. The problem is he genuinely believes he's an elite level player which means he will be judged by those standards.
If you talk like this you have to walk the walk.
I don’t know about that, he is deadly at international level and in Italy. The league just isn’t for him, it’s not for many players.Can pretty much judge people’s knowledge on football based on their opinion on Lukaku.