hellhunter
Eurofighter
Ah I see, then I agreeYou are strictly correct. It is an additional spend. But what I was meaning to say was that it just raises the historical underspend to that target.
Ah I see, then I agreeYou are strictly correct. It is an additional spend. But what I was meaning to say was that it just raises the historical underspend to that target.
Seeing people celebrate increases in military funding while commenting on a on going war/invasion is pure peak monkey brain.
It leads to a broken Russia. For the rest of us, it means we get to go about our lives freely.That is the worst possible news and outcome. Arm race doesn't lead into anything good.
No offense, but with all your pro military posts, you do sound like someone from 1913-1914.
Seeing people celebrate increases in military funding while commenting on a on going war/invasion is pure peak monkey brain.
yea, wanting a functioning military after a european country was invaded directly makes me some kind of militarist, especially after a former leader of the german army simply said "no" when asked whether or not the Bundeswehr could actually defend Germany in case of any invasion
Not like the whole integrity of whole Europe is under attack and the offender only understands military power
What's the alternative?Yup. Where do they think the money will come from? Welfare programs and public spending will suffer.
You think that the obvious lesson from all this is that if you cant defend yourself, you will be in Putins sights.
yea, wanting a functioning military after a european country was invaded directly makes me some kind of militarist, especially after a former leader of the german army simply said "no" when asked whether or not the Bundeswehr could actually defend Germany in case of any invasion
Not like the whole integrity of whole Europe is under attack and the offender only understands military power
You have NATO for that. NATO actually works.
NATO does work, but it is underfunded and overly reliant on the US, whose delivery cannot always be taken for granted. It should be fairly uncontroversial that Germany, given its position, might feel it needs the option of being able to better defend itself.You have NATO for that. NATO actually works.
So you're depending on other countries spending loads on their defence so that you yourself don't have to?
I don't get that logic in any way...
Not if their economy is export-driven and needs an upturn in the global economy to grow in order to create the 10-11 mil jobs required annually.
NATO does work, but it is underfunded and overly reliant on the US, whose delivery cannot always be taken for granted.
It makes sense. Without NaTo germany has to spend much much more to counter Russia alone
Yeah, because Russia will try to invade Germany![]()
Actually I think it's the opposite. NATO has been in an existential crisis for decades. Now europes most economically and politically powerful NATO member has decided it is time to draw a line under that.
“It's in your nature to destroy yourselves” - Robot DadGot to be honest, the delight at it has baffled me too.
Pretty much.Yup. Where do they think the money will come from? Welfare programs and public spending will suffer.
You live in one of the most advanced modern countries in the world. You don’t have any enemies you don’t need defending. You are posting on a football forum.There is a minimum need to defend yourself. If Germany goes over the edge and starts building 6000 nukes, we can definitely worry. But until that time comes, a stronger Germany is a stronger Europe, a stronger NATO.
a stronger Germany is a stronger Europe
Really?You live in one most of the most advanced modern countries in the world. You don’t have any enemies, you don’t need defending.
NATO does work, but it is underfunded and overly reliant on the US, whose delivery cannot always be taken for granted. It should be fairly uncontroversial that Germany, given its position, might feel it needs the option of being able to better defend itself.
Do you live in Ukraine?It leads to a broken Russia. For the rest of us, it means we get to go about our lives freely.
NATO as it is currently set is absolutely reliant both on US forces, leadership and command structures. I can guarantee that without the US, there is no NATO.As it is i think NATO can hold themselves without the US. 50/50 at worst against russia. And you have nukes.
So you're gucci if push comes to the shoves i think.
Germany already have nuclear latency.There is a minimum need to defend yourself. If Germany goes over the edge and starts building 6000 nukes, we can definitely worry. But until that time comes, a stronger Germany is a stronger Europe, a stronger NATO.
No but I do live in a country that has recently had its citizens killed by Russia.Do you live in Ukraine?
Which country is that?No but I do live in a country that has recently had its citizens killed by Russia.
Look, the best thing obviously is a world treaty to demilitarise all nations at once, but let's be honest? Is that EVER likely to happen?
NATO as it is currently set is absolutely reliant both on US forces, leadership and command structures. I can guarantee that without the US, there is no NATO.
Look, the best thing obviously is a world treaty to demilitarise all nations at once, but let's be honest. Is that EVER likely to happen?