i should be fine in New Orleans, Hurricanes have effectively reduced this place to nothingness anyway, Nuclear Holocaust will be another walk in the park besides who wants to bomb Mardi Gras? Putin is a warmonger but not a party pooper.
Shreveport - Bossier, where I once lived, is more worrisome, since it's home to the 8th Air Force Tactical B-52 Bomber Bomber Wing "Thunder From Above", and an integral part of US nuclear deterrence. As I mentioned in my previous post, it's highly unlikely Putin would initiate any first strike against any NATO targets, this deterrence stuff is a tactic to warn off additional military or humanitarian aid, further NATO deployments to the Baltics and Eastern Europe, and he's probably really not happy about the sanctions.
And again, there are sort of 5 levels of deployments of nuclear weapons, as I understand it.
1) Tactical Deployment against non-NATO or non-Russian aligned targets. Ukraine, unfortunately falls into this category, but again what's the point? Putin would lose everything he wants if he used these weapons against Ukraine.
2) Tactical Maritime: This would be hitting a naval combat groups or submarine(s) to disable or destroy them. Since it's in the ocean, it's basically considered legitimate military targets and the response would need to be appropriate. However, naval combat groups and subs are part of strategic deterrence and there would be both reciprocal conventional and tactical responses on both sides that would escalate.
3) Tactical Legitimate military targets outside the mainland: So NATO bases and forces outside the US, UK and France (like Poland, Estonia, etc.) or Russian forces outside mainland Russia (Kaliningrad, Belarus, Syria)
4) Strategic military targets on the Mainland - NATO submarine bases, military installations, and air force bases in the US, UK and France or mainland Russia. This would most likely result in massive civilian losses.
5) Strategic decapitation and total war strikes: Launching strikes against targets to decapitate the command and control structures and eliminate political leadership (Washington, London, Paris, Canberra, Moscow) and major population centers that are non-military targets (Chicago, New York City, St. Petersburg, and apparently according to some of you, Maidenhead and Slough, etc.)
The point: There is no absolutely way he will use nukes, nor will we. The Russians will ensure he just disappears in the night, and never be seen again, rather than be allowed to make that call. There's no way we do it first, unless we are convinced that he's completely irrational and have hard intelligence that proves he's seriously considering it.