- Joined
- Aug 14, 1999
- Messages
- 131,122
- Location
- Hollywood CA
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2017
Political scientist from RAND Corporation:
You're an odd man.
Oh right, as you were![]()
You want to read another essay?
humanity among us humans
Cheers. Thread updates so quickly it’s hard to keep up.It's from the 24th, I posted an article about it.
What happens, imo, is that the Russians make advances during the day, then the Ukrainians take it back during the night.Is anyone else concerned about how much of what we've been hearing so far is contradicted by the Klitschko statement saying that they're surrounded?
Are we being fed information far more optimistic than the reality of the situation?
It's quotes like this, the fact that Johnson got anywhere near Downing Street and all the madness over the last 10/15 years, that makes me think the large hadron collider really fecked things up and they've not said owt.I know words. The best words. All sort of words!
I see a lot of parallels here with the Cuban missile crisis. The US couldn't condone Russian missiles on Cuban soil in the same way Russia is not going tolerate NATO missiles in Ukraine. So this was a preemptive strike to quell the risk before it got out of hand.
This video helped me to at least understand Putin's perspective.
What happens, imo, is that the Russians make advances during the day, then the Ukrainians take it back during the night.
Political scientist from RAND Corporation:
feck FIFA. Time for the other seven non-Ukrainian sides in the playoffs to refuse to play.
If he is going to escalate he is going to escalate. If not now then next time he bites off more than he can chew. Unfortunately you can’t just keep being held hostage to the threats of Putin indefinitely.
As others have said, the best solution now would be for the Russians to step up and remove him.
Looks as if Lomachenko went back too after reports he had gone to Greece:
I doubt it. The world has moved on and CAS would be done if they did.CAS will probably overturn any expulsion of Russia from the playoffs or the WC should they qualify.
They haven't done that, they've sent a spearhead to Kyiv (border os only 50 miles away). Russia has occupied hardly any ground.Yet they still have Kiev surrounded and look poised to have toppled the capital city of a 30m+ country in less than a week
So I guess it comes down to what the expectations were.... I would have thought 2 weeks to take the land east of the river and coastline would have sounded really optimistic if somebody said that a week ago
Certainly don't recall at the time people.saying he would take over Kiev in 48 hours
Hard to know the truth but overlaying the info I would say it can't have gone that bad if they have surrounded Kiev and have left a lot of units in reserve to date
Equally it's clearly not been a blitzkrieg of shock and awe that has terrified other countries
Looks as if Lomachenko went back too after reports he had gone to Greece:
Yep absolutely. Would love it not to be so but we're also susceptible to state disinformation here. Not to anything like the same extent but I always take reporting with a pinch of salt.Is anyone else concerned about how much of what we've been hearing so far is contradicted by the Klitschko statement saying that they're surrounded?
Are we being fed information far more optimistic than the reality of the situation?
I know it seems laughable to some, but this is genuinely one of my major concerns. Not necessarily resulting in nuclear obliteration of the world, but this attitude in general resulting in escalation upon escalation. In other words, the hit to ego of defeat is more painful to bear for someone like Putin than the cost to humanity of doing something drastic.From the BBC
With all the countries around the world which are condemning Russia, will China be seeing the potential and drop Vlad as they won't want to be associated?
I doubt it. The world has moved on and CAS would be done if they did.
Get him on the ignore list, folks. Ignored him days ago but see all your messages taking his bait still.
Even in Russia there must be a way to prevent him from just doing it though.I know it seems laughable to some, but this is genuinely one of my major concerns. Not necessarily resulting in nuclear obliteration of the world, but this attitude in general resulting in escalation upon escalation. In other words, the hit to ego of defeat is more painful to bear for someone like Putin than the cost to humanity of doing something drastic.
Sigh. Promised in what sense? Show me the treaty where we agreed this. You can't because there isn't one.
Assuming the world doesn’t end over the course of this war, I think a condition for the lifting of sanctions on Russia needs to be some form of nuclear disarmament. You can’t have someone just threatening to launch nukes every time they don’t get their own way. Keep the sanctions on until they massively reduce (or completely dispose of) their nukes, with a guarantee of protection from probably China.
I can't think of any precedent supporting unilateral expulsion of Russia (or whatever name they compete under in international sporting competitions) from the WC. And there have been many wars.
But yeah, only one way to find out for sure, I'm only going off of past history and this is different in so many ways.
I'm definitely ignoring this post.Honestly, this is the most pointless kind of post. If you're ignoring him, just ignore him. I don't see why people feel the need to constantly comment on their ignore decisions.
Getting a bit embarrassing from our (Indian) side, voting against the emergency meeting:
Achieving a Russian nuclear disarmament is going to be tough if not impossible. In my view this doesn’t (or, can’t) end without the absolute end of the Putin era in Russia.Assuming the world doesn’t end over the course of this war, I think a condition for the lifting of sanctions on Russia needs to be some form of nuclear disarmament. You can’t have someone just threatening to launch nukes every time they don’t get their own way. Keep the sanctions on until they massively reduce (or completely dispose of) their nukes, with a guarantee of protection from probably China.
This would be suicide for Russia, there's literally no chance of this happeningAssuming the world doesn’t end over the course of this war, I think a condition for the lifting of sanctions on Russia needs to be some form of nuclear disarmament. You can’t have someone just threatening to launch nukes every time they don’t get their own way. Keep the sanctions on until they massively reduce (or completely dispose of) their nukes, with a guarantee of protection from probably China.
Why should you? When the Indo Pakistan war was on and the Americans wanted to censure India, it was the Soviets who stopped it. When the 7th fleet was on the coast of Bengal it was the Soviet nuclear submarines who put a block to it.
If India didn't, then you should be ashamed of yourself.