Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Largely because uncontroversial comments are treated as heresy and you see a group happy to move with it. This is how war tends to go though, so I should know better. I'm done with this thread anyway. I want it to stay on topic and I cannot engage here within the narrow limit defined by so many who have been trained to think "whataboutism" is a legitimate means of argument in a geopolitical debate (absurd). As I'll derail, I'm just going to remove myself.
The thing is, if I’m honest, from the few discussions you’ve been involved with, you clearly are not going to change your views. Even if some of them are clearly refuted. And not saying the “opposite” side aren’t in the same boat, but it’s a straw man argument to turn around to those people and basically say they are biased or misinformed. It’s hypocritical even. But the main point is it has nothing to do with this thread. Which is about Ukraine and Russian irrespective of whatever else is happening in the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mciahel Goodman
True.

It's fair to say that there was pretty much blanket condemnation over the Iraq invasion outside of the US and Blair government, and trying to draw a comparison between that reaction and the reaction to the Ukraine invasion requires a little more nuance than message board flippancy. It's also fair to stop to take a more objective look at the establishment narratives that have been forming over the last week, and the political self interest of many pundits and news networks. Whilst still wishing the best for the Ukrainian people and supporting the defence of their home.

Also the "whatabout that whataboutary" is definitely a thing now, whereby any legitimate criticism that isn't placing Putin at the epicentre of everything forever bad, is being angrily shutdown without any consideration for the central point.

We have Trump supporters, notorious racists and war criminals being thumbed up as respected analysts because they're on the Putin is a **** train.

War reduced to a match day thread.
Good post
 
If all us westerners admit we are horrible hypocrites who should have our handbags shit in and our faces pounded with a sack of dicks can you guys please move your off topic shit to a feck the West thread? As mentioned above by someone else I and others are using this thread to keep on top of things. This is an amazing multinational community of posters that is providing insight and info that’s is impossible to get anywhere else. Let’s keep that going. Also, we know we suck.
 
Great, create a "are the sanctions against Russia hypocritical" then. This topic has 3300 messages in 4 days, there's so many things going on that i'm pretty sure it's not the place to mix it with other debates even if I agree the west also has its hands dirty.
I kind of agree about that. But as you said if there are 3300 posts, some are bound to be off topic.
 
That's pretty much what the politicians are trying to peddle.
I don’t care about them, I care about this thread staying on track. If people want to sling insults or debate about other countries being invaded in the past take it to a new thread.
 
If all us westerners admit we are horrible hypocrites who should have our handbags shit in and our faces pounded with a sack of dicks can you guys please move your off topic shit to a feck the West thread? As mentioned above by someone else I and others are using this thread to keep on top of things. This is an amazing multinational community of posters that is providing insight and info that’s is impossible to get anywhere else. Let’s keep that going. Also, we know we suck.
Good post
 
To be fair to people, this is an emotional situation to process and i don't think it's that surprising historic injustices and frustrations come to the fore. It's inevitably related.

I've personally no desire to argue those matters as feel like it's been done. I do however find the dismissive nature of just reducing everything else to whataboutery a bit callous from some.
 
His perspective? I'm still struggling to understand why he says Ukraine is run by Nazis and why he's threatening to end life on earth. Do you have a vid on that?
While it's not run by Nazis, there is an element of them in the military apparatus, which is frankly terrifying:



 
Any updates on what caused that massive explosion? Was it actually a thermobaric bomb or a bomb hitting an object like fuel depot or something?
 
The UK can barely arm it’s own army. Whatever arrives in Ukraine from here, if anything, either won’t be working, won’t be in the hands of those trained to use it or some other complete clusterfcuk, falling perfectly in line with every other move a British government has ever done…I really wouldn’t worry about us having any involvement in the death of a single Russian! Unless we send them the 700m worth of useless PPE we have thanks again to a British government.
The sent £40m in aid though, which will be very helpful to the Ukrainian people.
 
Russia does not matter too much, their economy is essentially a gas station. Saudi Arabia would be huge cause they are the largest oil station in the world.

China would destroy the global economical system.
I thought so.

China hold 3.2 trillion in USD in reserves iirc. I think China are probably watching on and factoring in a similar scenario against them in regards to Taiwan.

Do you think the US would be insane enough to try and freeze out China the way they did to Russia ?

I don't think the global economy would be able to stand such an event.
 
On behalf of all Norwegians in here, I apologize for Lindisfarne, and the Viking raids in the Kiev region back in the day. Am I allowed to discuss whats going on now?
Shouldn't you rather apologize for actually founding what today is Russia? :lol:
 
Wonder if it's a potential reaction to the supposed massive Russian convoy sky news reported on a few hours ago, heading for Kyiv.

That convoy news was originally posted this morning across various twitter feeds, all Sky have done is verified it a day later.

It has nothing to do with that.
 
Quick question for any economists ?

If hypothetically Russia, China and Saudi Arabia decide to stop using the dollar, what would that do to the global economy ?

Russia have no choice, they cannot use the dollar
 
To be fair to people, this is an emotional situation to process and i don't think it's that surprising historic injustices and frustrations come to the fore. It's inevitably related.

I've personally no desire to argue those matters as feel like it's been done. I do however find the dismissive nature of just reducing everything else to whataboutery a bit callous from some.
The problem is that a lot of the “everything else” is ridiculous posts like “where was the condemnation of Iraq?”

There is a very interesting nuanced debate to be had about actions of the west in the past and what Russia is doing now, but for it to be interesting it needs to be more intellectual than it has been in this thread which ends up coming across as people trying to score points.

And as a separate point that debate should obviously not be in this thread.
 
Your pretence that people don’t understand why Russia would be concerned with Ukraine joining NATO is false because plenty have said that they do. However, it’s justifiably been ignored because whatever Putin’s concerns, Ukraine as a sovereign state can make its own choices and whilst understandable Putin would do whatever he could to change their mind, the acceptable line of “whatever” ends long before invading them. All in all the path chosen by Putin are sufficiently disproportionate to his concerns that his concerns, legitimate or not, are now irrelevant. Should the EU invade the UK because the UK decided to leave the EU to get us to stay?

What do you mean pretense. Maybe you understand but given the nature of some of the responses it's clear most people don't have a clue or why Russia might take offense.

Actually i take that back. Given your last sentence neither do you.
 
What do you mean pretense. Maybe you understand but given the nature of some of the responses it's clear most people don't have a clue or why Russia might take offense.

Actually i take that back. Given your last sentence neither do you.
Ok, enlighten me then.
 
The Buran program happened while the Soviet Union existed and Ukraine and Russia were part of that. Several important industries in regard to spaceflight and aviation were (and are) located in today Ukraine, including Antonov. But also the booster rockets for example were built in Ukraine (and the Zenit space launch vehicle is considered to be an Ukrainian rocket, which evolved from the Buran program)
I realized that, but was under the impression Moscow/Russia was the one planning and financing the program and that they built things in Ukraine because it was part of the Union. So who decided who kept what after the Soviet dissolution. Anyway, I'm derailing the thread now.
 
I have to say, I am slightly uneasy about the very public support for Ukraine by the EU and the UK with regard to sending weapons and effectively waging a proxy war. I agree with the actions but I wonder about the wisdom of advertising it so openly.

It just gives the madman an excuse to curse at the clouds and the perceived slights against him and Russia in the past. Again, I don't think less public expression of support would do much to change his mind but it somewhat seems to me that politicians in the EU and the UK are using this as a bit of a PR opportunity based on the wide-ranging public support.
 
Not stated. But I’d imagine stuff was sorted long before it was announced.

I would have imagined this was discussed and put in motion Saturday and the plans readied for use and likely moved closer to border ready to be used soon as necessary.
 
While it's not run by Nazis, there is an element of them in the military apparatus, which is frankly terrifying:





The Asov battalion is a very nasty bunch for sure. It's also overused by russian propaganda to justify their invasion. Each and every time they have to fight dirty, it's because they're facing the Azov battalion. They're real, they have neo-nazi tendancies but their influence is vastly inflated by Russia.
 
I have to say, I am slightly uneasy about the very public support for Ukraine by the EU and the UK with regard to sending weapons and effectively waging a proxy war. I agree with the actions but I wonder about the wisdom of advertising it so openly.

It just gives the madman an excuse to curse at the clouds and the perceived slights against him and Russia in the past. Again, I don't think less public expression of support would do much to change his mind but it somewhat seems to me that politicians in the EU and the UK are using this as a bit of a PR opportunity based on the wide-ranging public support.
It’s a weird one for sure. And no doubt one of the reasons for the decisions European governments are taking is with a view to appeasing the public outcry across European cities.
 
If all us westerners admit we are horrible hypocrites who should have our handbags shit in and our faces pounded with a sack of dicks can you guys please move your off topic shit to a feck the West thread? As mentioned above by someone else I and others are using this thread to keep on top of things. This is an amazing multinational community of posters that is providing insight and info that’s is impossible to get anywhere else. Let’s keep that going. Also, we know we suck.
This is still a discussion forum pal. I'm seeing more of these posts than actual posts going off topic.
 
I have to say, I am slightly uneasy about the very public support for Ukraine by the EU and the UK with regard to sending weapons and effectively waging a proxy war. I agree with the actions but I wonder about the wisdom of advertising it so openly.

It just gives the madman an excuse to curse at the clouds and the perceived slights against him and Russia in the past. Again, I don't think less public expression of support would do much to change his mind but it somewhat seems to me that politicians in the EU and the UK are using this as a bit of a PR opportunity based on the wide-ranging public support.

I think its better to advertise it publicly as an act of transparency than do it clandestinely. The public will be more on board that way and will to a degree feel like they have the power to affect what happens in Ukraine.
 
On behalf of all Norwegians in here, I apologize for Lindisfarne, and the Viking raids in the Kiev region back in the day. Am I allowed to discuss whats going on now?
:lol:
The majority of the posts here are discussing on the topic. But with posters from multiple nations here, some posts are bound to go off topic or go against the flow. I don't think it hinders the thread that much.But if the mods feel that the thread is being derailed, I guess it is better to get people to stop talking about it.
 
I have to say, I am slightly uneasy about the very public support for Ukraine by the EU and the UK with regard to sending weapons and effectively waging a proxy war. I agree with the actions but I wonder about the wisdom of advertising it so openly.

It just gives the madman an excuse to curse at the clouds and the perceived slights against him and Russia in the past. Again, I don't think less public expression of support would do much to change his mind but it somewhat seems to me that politicians in the EU and the UK are using this as a bit of a PR opportunity based on the wide-ranging public support.

Remaining passive gives Putin an upper hand. Some level of force has to be publicly announced.
 
I'm pretty sure NATO is confident that we can nullify his strategic nuclear threat if he uses it. No way we keep doing what we're doing without assurances.

I don't know how, and I hope we don't find out.
 




Ukranian forces apparently beating up Indian students and refusing them to escape to Poland. Many spent days without food to get to the border.

Not sure these clips show what they claim. Nobody is being beaten up or attacked there.

All this shit has been debunked several times over now. If you only have passport of a third country and stayed in Ukraine until now, unsurprisingly you are going to have a very, very long wait to get through the border crossings if you only now choose to flee. Ukrainian and EU citizens are going to be prioritised for processing and that may well mean citizens of third countries waiting several days as demand for processing outstrips capacity. And no shit are the border guards going to be increasingly short on patience if people are where they shouldn’t be, refuse to listen to instructions or start trying to rush the border.
 
It’s a weird one for sure. And no doubt one of the reasons for the decisions European governments are taking is with a view to appeasing the public outcry across European cities.

Maybe there is something to it in the sense of flexing muscles and showing Russia we can outspend them and outlast them. We did it with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan too.
 
To be clear, I am not at all saying Russia is in their rights to invade Ukraine at this time. There should have been more efforts at a diplomatic solution given Ukraine's admission into NATO was not imminent. I just feel Russia point if view is completely ignored even though it's legitimate. If the tables were turned we would try our best to keep ukraine out of allied control. Hence my devils advocacy.

I'll comment on some of your points.
I don't think it really matters if currently there nuclear warheads in Eastern Europe. They exist in founding member states. There are other types of missles and NATO could deploy nuclear ones as well without notice should they decide to.
Agreed about the eligibility, and with those sort of territorial disputes the are unlikely to gain membership anytime soon.
What do you mean 1997. The lastest member was admitted in 2020.
Hmm. I’m not sure what to make of this.

“I don’t think it really matters if currently there Nuclear weapons in Eastern Europe” - So you are opposed to all conventional weapons in Eastern Europe? When you posted that video from Putin he said missiles pointed at Russia - if it’s not nuclear then you tell me what types of missiles he’s so infuriated by. Because the only ones that count are nuclear - if he, himself, is referring to Cuba. Regarding Ukraine, it had conventional missile systems left over from the USSR or purchased directly from Russia after Ukraine became independent. NATO wasn’t selling or supplying them until after the Crimea, Donbas and Luhansk invasions. Don’t post Russian disinformation unless you can back it up. And also … we all know what Putin in that propaganda video you took the time to post implied with “missiles pointed at Russia” - he implied and lied that they were nuclear.

“What do you mean 1997?” The Russian government, in its formal letter to the US demanded returns to pre-1997. So, Northem Macedonia was admitted in 2020? That justifies the invasion of Ukraine?

Christ, what a post. Jesus help me.

if you want to play Devil’s Advocate, at least understand the Devil you’re advocating for.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure NATO is confident that we can nullify his strategic nuclear threat if he uses it. No way we keep doing what we're doing without assurances.

I don't know how, and I hope we don't find out.
We can't nullify it, that's a simple fact.

However we might be sure that the troops wouldn't fulfill the order to actually use nuclear weapons. It is likely that western intelligence knows quite well how the Russian army leaders think. We might be trying to force their hand to get rid of Putin and end this madness.