Smores
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2011
- Messages
- 25,804
I feel like we're a day or so away from Rubio demanding that we drop nukes as a preemptive measure.
No you can't. There are some glaring hypocrisies in the world that doesn't involve twisting a story.
Caring about it is different from forming actual opinions such as this being unprecedented or "more severe" than other incidents. It's a bigger deal because it's actual Europeans?
Not long ago Trever Noah was running skits on India and Pakistan headed to war. Two nuclear powers. It's just less human for the west when the rest do it because they are probably used to it.
My feeling, it is not worth the trouble. Crimea is already Russian and is not coming back, so legalizing it in Security Council to give something to Putin loses nothing for Ukraine. And Donbas, I do not see how Ukraine gets it back without a massive military intervention, where they do to Donbas what Russia is doing to them.I keep seeing this but Russia aren’t asking for Ukrainian territories so why are people so quick to give them away?
Too many questions for me to answer there.
I don't think land should be owned on an historical precedence because we've seen countless wars over the ambiguity of ownership and i don't see history affording rights to impose will. The people who take up home in any place should decide for themselves in a free manner and under no influence of threat, it's obviously never that simple and needs working through but that's the principle i'd stand behind. I'm against suppression of secessionism as i am oppression by military takeover, although the latter is obviously much worse than the former.
I've no idea if Crimea at this stage want to join Russia or reform with Ukraine, hopefully if Russia withdraws completely Ukraine do let them have that choice.
I could see the outline of a potential deal along the lines of:
That sounds roughly fair (not perfect) and allows Ukraine, the West and Russia each to spin it as relative success.
- Donbass stays part of Ukraine but with Catalunya-style regional autonomy, including as to language
- Crimea stays with Russia subject to a confirmatory referendum and, in any event, a long-term lease of Sevastopol
- Ukraine moves towards EU accession
- Ukraine stays neutral for military alliance purposes but NATO (or US, UK, France, Germany, Poland) and Russia jointly guarantee the territorial integrity of Ukraine
However, the problem is that Putin has destroyed any remaining vestige of credibility and it seems the West (even Germany) has finally moved past the point where they see any possibility of a working relationship with him. The West can continue to try squeeze Russia to encourage a palace coup in Moscow but, in the meantime, it’s Ukraine in the meat grinder as its citizens get killed or forced out and its infrastructure gets smashed up. There is no easy answer right now unfortunately.
Surely this is not the move that's going make Russia back down?!
I could see the outline of a potential deal along the lines of:
That sounds roughly fair (not perfect) and allows Ukraine, the West and Russia each to spin it as relative success.
- Donbass stays part of Ukraine but with Catalunya-style regional autonomy, including as to language
- Crimea stays with Russia subject to a confirmatory referendum and, in any event, a long-term lease of Sevastopol
- Ukraine moves towards EU accession
- Ukraine stays neutral for military alliance purposes but NATO (or US, UK, France, Germany, Poland) and Russia jointly guarantee the territorial integrity of Ukraine
However, the problem is that Putin has destroyed any remaining vestige of credibility and it seems the West (even Germany) has finally moved past the point where they see any possibility of a working relationship with him. The West can continue to try squeeze Russia to encourage a palace coup in Moscow but, in the meantime, it’s Ukraine in the meat grinder as its citizens get killed or forced out and its infrastructure gets smashed up. There is no easy answer right now unfortunately.
I could see the outline of a potential deal along the lines of:
That sounds roughly fair (not perfect) and allows Ukraine, the West and Russia each to spin it as relative success.
- Donbass stays part of Ukraine but with Catalunya-style regional autonomy, including as to language
- Crimea stays with Russia subject to a confirmatory referendum and, in any event, a long-term lease of Sevastopol
- Ukraine moves towards EU accession
- Ukraine stays neutral for military alliance purposes but NATO (or US, UK, France, Germany, Poland) and Russia jointly guarantee the territorial integrity of Ukraine
However, the problem is that Putin has destroyed any remaining vestige of credibility and it seems the West (even Germany) has finally moved past the point where they see any possibility of a working relationship with him. The West can continue to try squeeze Russia to encourage a palace coup in Moscow but, in the meantime, it’s Ukraine in the meat grinder as its citizens get killed or forced out and its infrastructure gets smashed up. There is no easy answer right now unfortunately.
Good read here, explain why Russia invade Ukraine, and helps understand the whole situation and motives behind the invasion.
US and UK are guaranteed to intervene at some stage. I have no doubt that lots of preparation is going on behind the scenes right now. Russia's economy is dead, and it will be difficult to finance this war for a long period of time. Lukashenko is next. Belarussian economy will rest in peace very soon too.
EU application without referendum and Ukraine's democracy being weak to put it mildly? What could possibly go wrong? We'll have another Hungary or Poland in our hands, just great.
I think Putin has taken military neutrality for Ukraine off the table now tbh. Ukraine's argument will be Russia cannot be allowed to get what they want out of this and that they cannot trust Russia any longer to hold up their end. Handing back 1/3 regions and having their demands about neutrality agreed to is Russia winning.
This is utterly disgusting behavior and should be addressed by the EU leaders talking to Ukrainian authorities right now.
I think it will be very hard for people to accept that after the international treaties which guaranteed Ukraine's sovereignty in the 1990s were violated by Russia. You will inevitably run into people who ask why they should trust Russia to comply with a new international treaty when they ignored the last one.
I just cannot see how any deal giving up Ukrainian territory is not spun as rewarding Putin for his violations of international law.
So Finland's PM announced they will send weapons too? Bold move considering they're not a NATO-member as of this moment.
I understand your point and do not want to reward the aggressor either but I don’t think an absolute victory is feasible here. In my scenario Ukraine has definitively swung to the West via EU accession and Russia has to face the full force of NATO if it tries any further encroachments. That’s really the key thing here - no one wants Ukraine as a NATO member launchpad from which to invade Russia. As for Crimea, I don’t think any Russian leader can concede and remain in power.
Not gonna happen.US and UK are guaranteed to intervene at some stage. I have no doubt that lots of preparation is going on behind the scenes right now. Russia's economy is dead, and it will be difficult to finance this war for a long period of time. Lukashenko is next. Belarussian economy will rest in peace very soon too.
I think it will be very hard for people to accept that after the international treaties which guaranteed Ukraine's sovereignty in the 1990s were violated by Russia. You will inevitably run into people who ask why they should trust Russia to comply with a new international treaty when they ignored the last one.
I just cannot see how any deal giving up Ukrainian territory is not spun as rewarding Putin for his violations of international law.
This group is being asked to stay where they are at the time of the video, unless you have a translation of what's being said? Framing this as Ukraine refusing the key Africans leave the country is propaganda likely of Russian origin, don't you think?
When you say rewarding Putin do you mean his ego because honestly who gives a feck what Putin thinks. The only concern should be would it bolster his support and/or encourage him to do this again but right now it doesn't seem like either would be true, he's embarrassed himself and NATO will now step in to ensure he cant' take any further action.
I live in ‘Arabia’, as do millions of other people. You may have your own feelings about leaders here, which I really don’t care about, but calling for Russia to attack other countries that you simply don’t like, given what we’ve seen over the past few days, and given what myself and my family have been through when Saddam invaded us, is frankly disgusting. Think before you post. This thread isn’t a free for all.
What!? Unbelievable post, in so many ways.
Btw, what does the ‘88’ in your username refer to?
Likely thinks the Middle East is east of everything because east is in the name. Let's be honest, based on the insanity of the post I'm impressed they know that East is a direction.
They won't join the EU anytime soon, it's purely symbolic and doesn't mean anything substantial.
I know he’s a bit of a weirdo but Bald and Bankrupt’s latest video showing him and other Ukrainians flee Ukraine is worth watching. I’ve only seen half of it so far but the Ukrainians seemed a hell of a lot calmer than I would be
Good read here, explain why Russia invade Ukraine, and helps understand the whole situation and motives behind the invasion.
Finally watched it — it's a brilliantly researched video although not without a few misconceptions. The biggest one, I believe, is the overaccentuation on the economy as the main motivation for Putin's actions which lead to the comments like this. It's certainly a big part of any decision-making but prioritising economy is more of a capitalistic concept while Putin had shown that he's certainly willing to sacrifice it in order of reaching his main goals. This is why Putin's actions are so hard to predict by any Western analytic (or even western-oriented Russian experts).Great video. Basically putler is the military leader of the oligarchs. You have to feel for the Ukrainian people. They are losing everything while caught between superpowers.
This is utterly disgusting behavior and should be addressed by the EU leaders talking to Ukrainian authorities right now.
I know he’s a bit of a weirdo but Bald and Bankrupt’s latest video showing him and other Ukrainians flee Ukraine is worth watching. I’ve only seen half of it so far but the Ukrainians seemed a hell of a lot calmer than I would be
Specifically I think that those concessions would be opposed by NATO, as they would set a precedent, as well as Ukraine. The US may be concerned at the message it sends to China too in relation to Taiwan. I don't see diplomacy working without both sides give ground, and I just am very sceptical that ground will be given.
We have international laws since 1648. Just because there is a treaty X that states that territory Y should be owned by entity A, for me this is not an eternal commitment.
So, in Latvia I m sure there was a treaty somewhere assigning the territory to the German empire. Does it mean that Latvian people should have stayed forever under German rule? Or for example: Crimea was transferred under soviet rule in 1954? Was that legal? In 1991, when Crimeans were asked, they stated they wanted to be part of Russia. Now, let's go to Latvia. If I m not mistaken, you demanded independence during the 80s. How would you feel, if instead of having the independence you wanted, the Russians would say: nope sorry, we have a constitution that says you are part of soviet union, you can't leave.
This is utterly disgusting behavior and should be addressed by the EU leaders talking to Ukrainian authorities right now.
I keep seeing this but Russia aren’t asking for Ukrainian territories so why are people so quick to give them away?
Don't underestimate the commonality of racism in Eastern Europe & especially in Ukraine & Russia (in this particular case we really are very much alike). It doesn't make Ukraine a nazi state like Putin claims, but those traits do tend to show up quite often, sadly — especially in stressful situations like that where those armed men are choosing between them & their own women and children.This group is being asked to stay where they are at the time of the video, unless you have a translation of what's being said? Framing this as Ukraine refusing the key Africans leave the country is propaganda likely of Russian origin, don't you think?
I hope so, sometimes people get carried away in these stressful moments.