Eurotrash
Full Member
The whole thing summarizes my feelings exactly. The longer we wait to take action, the higher the price will be.
Fuuuuck me. How can anyone be so dumb to publicly say this? The Athletic’s journalist refused to report it at first as he was so disgusted with it.
There's probably many things the public doesn't know. Maybe Putin felt it wasn't the right moment yet. Maybe he wanted to wait out the pandemic.The one thing I don’t get - why didn’t he invade 18 months ago when his mate was in the White House? If the US was on the sidelines, I doubt Europe would have felt emboldened to take such decisive action.
Agreed, I didn't find him convincing. I think Putin considered this a one time golden opportunity to 'catch' Ukraine as it still wasn't in the NATO. An extremely brazen move, and we'll have to wait out the sanctions, but I don't see him attacking the Baltics.
The one thing I don’t get - why didn’t he invade 18 months ago when his mate was in the White House? If the US was on the sidelines, I doubt Europe would have felt emboldened to take such decisive action.
It just seems like miscalculation. Unless he determined that trump is so volatile he didn't want to force his hand on such a dilemma.There's probably many things the public doesn't know. Maybe Putin felt it wasn't the right moment yet. Maybe he wanted to wait out the pandemic.
More needs to be done for Ukraine. This can not be allowed to go on
That's very optimisticI assume the cease fire is beneficial to both to restock, resupply and importantly get civilians out
Not sure I understand this way of thinking. How can the price be higher than nuclear Holocaust?The whole thing summarizes my feelings exactly. The longer we wait to take action, the higher the price will be.
I think the response he has seen to the invasion of a non-Nato country have pretty much put to bed any chance attack on an actual Nato/EU country (e.g. Poland/Finland/Baltics).Agreed, I didn't find him convincing. I think Putin considered this a one time golden opportunity to 'catch' Ukraine as it still wasn't in the NATO. An extremely brazen move, and we'll have to wait out the sanctions, but I don't see him attacking the Baltics.
And, I never bought this Trump was in Putin’s pocket. Trump was the useful idiot but not on his pocket.Probably because the presence of a NATO hostile US President was enough to help stall the spread of democracy.
Also, the price of oil was very low during much of Trump's term, which would've resulted in far less oil revenue for the Russian state.
The one thing I don’t get - why didn’t he invade 18 months ago when his mate was in the White House? If the US was on the sidelines, I doubt Europe would have felt emboldened to take such decisive action.
Yeah the guy is a clownIt's a good point but as I personally complained on two seperate occasions about Mr. Glendenning's use of racist language when he wrote for The Guardian he can eat a bowl of dicks.
Not really sure. These are European refuges, not Arabic ones, so even conservative people in Europe are more willing/tolerant towards them.And not only will Putin bring back Ukraine under Russian influence, he'll also have fueled another humanitarian refugee crisis. As a result of more refugees coming in, we might witness an even bigger increase in right-wing populism in the West.
No chance.And not only will Putin bring back Ukraine under Russian influence, he'll also have fueled another humanitarian refugee crisis. As a result of more refugees coming in, we might witness an even bigger increase in right-wing populism in the West.
The US and the West should never have enticed Ukraine about joining NATO.
It was directly threatening to Russia.
Non military benefits should not have been conditional on Ukraine joining NATO.
No one can justify Putin invading Ukraine.
But lets not pretend the West did not have a huge role in what is happening now.
But for how long until people will complain about housing, welfare and such, and start feeling annoyed about them? Even if ungrounded in reality? Some right wing populist will come along and exploit these resentments.Not really sure. These are European refuges, not Arabic ones, so even conservative people in Europe are more willing/tolerant towards them.
I think the response he has seen to the invasion of a non-Nato country have pretty much put to bed any chance attack on an actual Nato/EU country (e.g. Poland/Finland/Baltics).
But for how long until people will complain about housing, welfare and such, and start feeling annoyed about them? Even if ungrounded in reality? Some right wing populist will come along and exploit these resentments.
Yep. He may wondered before all this but there can be no doubt about the western resolve around NATO now.
I think that's a generous assessment, considering we're basically watching while Russia flattens a country of 40m people, too afraid to even send unmanned Migs, and our sanctions may be effective, but they still lack conviction, with all their loopholes for diamonds and 30 day warning period.
That's true, but the sanctions are there to stayWe are only a week into this and I'd be shocked if in 30 days Kyiv wasn't rubble or surrendered
Which is a greater reason for my firm belief in term limits in any political domain in the world. No country can evolve nor learn to be better unless it moves on with younger leaders with fresh ideas over time.All in all, a total mess facilitated by 20+ years in office and being surrounded by lackeys.
I'm guessing it would be more about cyber attacks, propaganda and election tampering culminating in regime change more favourable to Russia.Yep. He may wondered before all this but there can be no doubt about the western resolve around NATO now.
A NATO-inclined Ukraine is no threat to Russia. It's a threat - because of the freedom and democracy it sets as an example - to Putin's regime.
This is all about Putin's gangster-state, not Russia.
Some thoughts on Putin’s supposed objectives:
1. Keeping Ukraine out of NATO/EU - he has advertised the benefit of full Western alignment such that Moldova and Georgia are also applying to the EU.
2. Ukraine is basically a region of Russia with a funny dialect - Ukraine has probably now the strongest sense of nationhood in Its entire history.
3. Securing the oil and gas pipeline - Europe is now committed to diversification, Nordstream is dead, and, if he does want to occupy or maintain control of southern Ukraine for the transit route, no one will buy it.
4. Projecting regional and global power - his army has performed poorly, shattering the myth of military might, and, in the process of invading, he is reducing his already under- sized economy to third world level.
All in all, a total mess facilitated by 20+ years in office and being surrounded by lackeys.
Not posting graphic sex and violence is fairly standard across forums. Even more so with an ongoing situation where people might know some of the souls involved.I really don’t understand why dead bodies aren’t posted in this thread.
Shouldn’t everyone, everywhere be seeing this? Why cover up the atrocities?
Really don’t get it.
No but dictators have been overthrow by the people before.ha yes because dictators stay in power due to the overwhelming love of their people.
Which is a greater reason for my firm belief in term limits in any political domain in the world. No country can evolve nor learn to be better unless it moves on with younger leaders with fresh ideas over time.