Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Jotun said:
While Russia is underperforming, I don't think it's really THAAT spectacular. They are still managing to advance. They are pummeling cities into submission. Yes, they are having logistics issues, but that was always going to be a concern with Russian (my father used to live in Russia and he tells me stories of soldiers trading diesel from tanks for vodka). I'm trying to be optimistic and hope that Russia (military and economy) will collapse soon. But Russian strength was always artillery and that's what they are still using. I'm of the opinion you can't win a war and conquer country with only artillery, but I'm no expert, so we'll see. Russia went into this war with completely wrong intel and no preparation, they've had to adapt and they did it. Now they are doing what they do best, leveling cities to oblivion. You've probably noticed there are not as much videos of captured Russians, of destroyed tanks and captured gear. They still are there, but less then they were in the first week. We also know nothing about Ukrainians casualties. At this point I feel this is turning into a war of attrition.




I know. I don't listen to them either. I just got triggered by "their we were wrong, but not really" thread.
Click to expand...
They are not advancing. All they do is bomb cities now.
 
Adisa said:
As a matter of principle, a sovereign nation will never agree to cede its rightful territory after it has been invaded.
Click to expand...

Has happened literally dozens of time in history though. Between nations, never mind empires. Example: Balkan Wars.

Adisa said:
What's to stop it happening again?
Click to expand...

What do you mean? There's only two ways a stronger nation doesn't chop bits off a weaker neighbour. They're strategic allies/partners or there's sufficient deterrence (military or economic). No piece of paper offers any guarantees, anyway. Same for any peace agreement.

Adisa said:
Ukraine will never accept Crimea/Donbas as Russian land nor should they.
Click to expand...

Probably not, but it will become a frozen conflict and those have a higher risk of re-flaring (see Nagorno-Karabakh) as soon as opportunities for either side to improve their position arise.

PS. Again, there's nothing to say a peace agreement would stop Russia in the future. But without it, the chances of it happening again and sooner, increase.
 
Last edited:
11101 said:
I think they can kiss Crimea goodbye, Russia is almost the dug in defending nation there, but the next week or two will determine Ukraine's approach elsewhere. I doubt they will agree to anything before then. By all accounts they have stalled the Russian advances and are beginning to counter attack. They will want to see if they can drive Russia out without having to give any concessions at all.

If, as is being discussed, Ukraine can get some S300s and other familiar ex-Soviet high altitude anti air systems from Eastern European neighbours, then Russia has very little left to hurt them with.
Click to expand...

Russia is pretty much the defending nation in Crimea and casualty tolls will reverse dramatically if Ukraine were to stage an offensive there. They basically don't have enough offensive assets and if they started the Russian strategy of blitzing cities from afar, then Western public opinion and goodwill on which Ukraine so much depends will turn.

Their only hope is Russia ups and leaves, but that would essentially be an admission of defeat by Putin, not just in the war but in rolling back 8 years of his work in Ukraine. There is no way he can present that as win or even as a draw and I feel pretty sure that he will rather go isolationist than accept that.

711 said:
That could even be Ukraine's exact fall-back position but they are not going to admit it and open negotiations from there or Russia will just want more. The sad thing is how many die as their talks move to a conclusion of course.
Click to expand...

Yeah perhaps.
 
Don't Kill Bill said:
.... There is no peace deal that would prevent Russia having another go ...
Click to expand...

There is if the deal includes Ukraine joining the EU, because then there can be EU troops - and even military bases - in Ukraine. If Russia can't defeat Ukraine, then it certainly wouldn't be keen on re-invading and facing EU troops in addition.

However, short of EU membership, I agree with you.
 
Current Ukranian government will never ever recognize Crimea as a part of Russian Federation. Donbas and Luhansk will never be recognized as independent republics either.
 
hellhunter said:
Click to expand...

So basically Russia's line here is 'we should be allowed to attack Ukraine, who should not be allowed to purchase any weapons, and should not have anyone helping them out while we can ask Belarus, Kazakhstan and Syria for assistance'.
 
Don't Kill Bill said:
I agree.

There isn't any outside pressure on Ukraine to settle if they do not want to.

As long as the Russians don't break through they are dying in droves and their supply issues will only worsen. Putin either doubles down and calls up the reserves and increases conscription or he risks losing most of the men he has invaded with. At this point can he even be sure of being able to pull this army out? Ounce the retreat starts it could easily turn into a rout with thousands of men cut off.

Why would the Ukrainians give up now and let Putin lick his wounds and come back later with the shortcomings of his forces addressed. There is no peace deal that would prevent Russia having another go.

So its up to Zelensky to decide what is best in the long term for Ukraine.
Click to expand...

Well one reason for them to be cautious about standing firm is that day after day thousands of civilians will be dying and I don't think there is any limit to how many Putin would be willing to kill. If he wants to tear Kyiv down he has enough weapons to do that, and will probably not hesitate either. That's not even a risk, that is a certainty. Also, Putin basically has a free pass now because West will not really do anything more than what they've already done by sanctioning Russia and providing Ukraine with weapons. If he feels like he wants to kill every single person in Kyiv, he will do that and probably nothing will happen to him or Russia on their territory, that is the worst part of it.
 
Jotun said:
While Russia is underperforming, I don't think it's really THAAT spectacular. They are still managing to advance. They are pummeling cities into submission. Yes, they are having logistics issues, but that was always going to be a concern with Russian (my father used to live in Russia and he tells me stories of soldiers trading diesel from tanks for vodka). I'm trying to be optimistic and hope that Russia (military and economy) will collapse soon. But Russian strength was always artillery and that's what they are still using. I'm of the opinion you can't win a war and conquer country with only artillery, but I'm no expert, so we'll see. Russia went into this war with completely wrong intel and no preparation, they've had to adapt and they did it. Now they are doing what they do best, leveling cities to oblivion. You've probably noticed there are not as much videos of captured Russians, of destroyed tanks and captured gear. They still are there, but less then they were in the first week. We also know nothing about Ukrainians casualties. At this point I feel this is turning into a war of attrition.




I know. I don't listen to them either. I just got triggered by "their we were wrong, but not really" thread.
Click to expand...

Well depends on how you want to assess their progress. They wanted to take over major cities, they haven't. Their strategy is now to kill as many civilians as they can, destroy as much of the cities as they can and hope Ukraine gives up based on that. We knew from the start they would be able to do that, as would any other country invading any other country for that matter. It's not advancing.
 
GlastonSpur said:
There is if the deal includes Ukraine joining the EU, because then there can be EU troops - and even military bases - in Ukraine. If Russia can't defeat Ukraine, then it certainly wouldn't be keen on re-invading and facing EU troops in addition.

However, short of EU membership, I agree with you.
Click to expand...

Which is not a deal between Ukraine and Russia anymore, but rather EU and Ukraine and Russia. Sure as hell, EU will not oblige themselves on having to accept Ukraine in EU. But I do think that an agreement between Russia, Ukraine AND West is necessary, mainly that West needs to guarantee the independence and sovereignty of Ukraine. Any guarantees by Russia or deals with them are not worth the paper they are written on and you have no reason to believe Putin won't come back in two years to take more.
 
Jotun said:
Which is not a deal between Ukraine and Russia anymore, but rather EU and Ukraine and Russia. Sure as hell, EU will not oblige themselves on having to accept Ukraine in EU. But I do think that an agreement between Russia, Ukraine AND West is necessary, mainly that West needs to guarantee the independence and sovereignty of Ukraine. Any guarantees by Russia or deals with them are not worth the paper they are written on and you have no reason to believe Putin won't come back in two years to take more.
Click to expand...

Ukraine having the right to apply to join the EU would have to be part of any peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, or else there won't be a peace deal.

And I'm pretty sure the EU would fast track Ukraine's application and welcome them in. Every Western nation has now had the blinkers removed and sees Russia as an existentialist threat that must be countered.
 
The Firestarter said:
They are not advancing. All they do is bomb cities now.
Click to expand...
From what I can tell, they are attempting to encircle Kyiv and Kharkiv and gaining some, albeit limited progress in those operations. North eastern fronts seems to be coming closer to Kiev with each day. For instance they've managed to bypass Chernihiv and go around it. Mariupol is already encircled and cut off and if it falls they will have a land bridge between Crimea and Russia and they'll be able to move those troops west and north. My guess it that's what Putin is hoping for.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Russia is doing particularly good, I'm definitely not saying they are winning. But they are doing what they do best, pummel cities into non-existence while they slowly try to encircle and cut them off.

Also, worth mentioning is, we know something about Russian loses, but almost nothing about Ukrainians. We don't know how much tanks they've lost, how much gear, how much professional and trained soldiers (and this is important as it will take time before mobilized civilians can operate at the same level). This is a war of attrition and we know nothing of Ukrainians losses and while we know Russia suffers, we also know Russia can take losses and doesn't care much about it, certainly not leadership.
 
There is no way Ukraine can disarm to any sort of meaningful level. Not with Vladimir Putin in charge of Russia.

You just know he'll come back for Round 2 in a year's time. If they have US and EU security guarantees, that's a different story because that means we will join the war next time and that is probably enough to deter Putin for a long time.
 
GlastonSpur said:
Ukraine having the right to apply to join the EU would have to be part of any peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, or else there won't be a peace deal.

And I'm pretty sure the EU would fast track Ukraine's application and welcome them in. Every Western nation has now had the blinkers removed and sees Russia as an existentialist threat that must be countered.
Click to expand...

Ukraine always had that right, it's a non-negotiable right of any independent nation and can never be a bargaining chip, otherwise Ukraine may just admit to being another Belarus.

As for your second point, if I'm Zelensky, I want that in writing. Even then, Putin might come back before the fast-track is done.

Basically, if I'm Ukrainian's negotiator I demand guarantees from the West or I cede nothing and demand Russia completely pulls to pre-2014 situation (which I can not imagine happening). If Ukraine cedes anything, they have no guarantee Putin won't come back in a year or two.

The more I think about it, shis is such a terrible war, with no good position for any of the involved parties (Ukraine, Russia, EU, USA).
 
2cents said:
Click to expand...

He's giving them impossible demands, he doesn't want peace, he wants war. After what Russia did they're never going to agree to disarm or not join NATO, and de-nazification is literally impossible considering it's a made up bullshit reason for his invasion in the first place. The leader is a jew ffs, he's about as nazi as sushi.
 
Jotun said:
From what I can tell, they are attempting to encircle Kyiv and Kharkiv and gaining some, albeit limited progress in those operations. North eastern fronts seems to be coming closer to Kiev with each day. For instance they've managed to bypass Chernihiv and go around it. Mariupol is already encircled and cut off and if it falls they will have a land bridge between Crimea and Russia and they'll be able to move those troops west and north. My guess it that's what Putin is hoping for.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Russia is doing particularly good, I'm definitely not saying they are winning. But they are doing what they do best, pummel cities into non-existence while they slowly try to encircle and cut them off.

Also, worth mentioning is, we know something about Russian loses, but almost nothing about Ukrainians. We don't know how much tanks they've lost, how much gear, how much professional and trained soldiers (and this is important as it will take time before mobilized civilians can operate at the same level). This is a war of attrition and we know nothing of Ukrainians losses and while we know Russia suffers, we also know Russia can take losses and doesn't care much about it, certainly not leadership.
Click to expand...
I'm not an expert but all the territory they've taken is right next to the border and they've not been able to manage even those limited supply lines. It's a fantasy to think they will be able to move troops North, they will get murdered. They have come to a halt, which means they are increasingly easy pickings for Ukraine (although you make a fair point about scale of Ukrainian losses, they have been avoiding direct confrontations). And while you say Russian can take losses... I know you mean that politically, but militarily they can't sustain this. I read they are out of cruise missiles, out of precision weapons, and they've lost a vast amount of their armour, they have no secure comms, limited ability to manoeuvre, let alone what 30k casualties will do to their operational effectiveness. We're watching an army being beaten here. If they are forced to retreat before a deal, if they can install those air defences in the next few days which will enable them to widen counter attacks, it'll become a rout.
 
Last edited:
MadMike said:
Russia is pretty much the defending nation in Crimea and casualty tolls will reverse dramatically if Ukraine were to stage an offensive there. They basically don't have enough offensive assets and if they started the Russian strategy of blitzing cities from afar, then Western public opinion and goodwill on which Ukraine so much depends will turn.

Their only hope is Russia ups and leaves, but that would essentially be an admission of defeat by Putin, not just in the war but in rolling back 8 years of his work in Ukraine. There is no way he can present that as win or even as a draw and I feel pretty sure that he will rather go isolationist than accept that.
Click to expand...

Crimea is gone, whether the officially cede it or not. But the rest of Ukraine is up for grabs and really not certain that Russia will be able to keep control of any of it in the next few weeks. If the counter attacks are successful there's a very real prospect that Russia will be forced to leave empty handed. Putin might not want to admit defeat but he may have no choice. If Ukraine can push their artillery back beyond range of the cities and they find a way to shoot cruise missiles down (some reports say Russia's stockpile is running low as it is), it's over for Russia.

In other words, if Russia don't make significant advances in the next couple of weeks it might not be up to Putin how this war ends.
 
Interesting thread that covers Russian army being made up of non-Russian ethnic people to make it more palatable:

 
11101 said:
In other words, if Russia don't make significant advances in the next couple of weeks it might not be up to Putin how this war ends.
Click to expand...
I think his army needs to be defeated (easy to say though). Next week or so will be crucial to tell us how likely that is, if Ukraine can hold out. If they can beat Russia and rout its army, then Putin isn't handwaving that one away.
 
nickm said:
I think his army needs to be defeated (easy to say though). Next week or so will be crucial to tell us how likely that is, if Ukraine can hold out. If they can beat Russia and rout its army, then Putin isn't handwaving that one away.
Click to expand...

Don't think that's realistic.

The best we can hope for is for UKR just needs to hold on and frustrated the Russians; increase the bodybags and deplete the hardware -- and wait for the sanctions to kick in and create domestic pressures and financial limitations.
 
Adisa said:
As a matter of principle, a sovereign nation will never agree to cede its rightful territory after it has been invaded. What's to stop it happening again?
Click to expand...

It has kind of already happened and Putin is using that example to justify a lot of things he has done.
 
What is thus denazification the prick is on about?

Was there even anything remotely dangerous to Russia in Ukraine?
 
sglowrider said:
Don't think that's realistic.
Click to expand...
There seem to be at least some successful counter attacks north of Kiyv. While I agree a total win isn't realistic for Ukraine, at least that Russian front might actually collapse, especially if Belarus stays reluctant to send their troops in.
 
Lloyd Austin is in Bratislava today, presumably for this. I can see why the Russians are bricking it.

 
stefan92 said:
There seem to be at least some successful counter attacks north of Kiyv. While I agree a total win isn't realistic for Ukraine, at least that Russian front might actually collapse, especially if Belarus stays reluctant to send their troops in.
Click to expand...
By all accounts, Belarus army is terrible and one of the worst in Europe. So I do not think Belarus sending troops in changes anything.

Unless Russia goes full WMD, I think they have already lost this war.
 
sun_tzu said:
presumably cruise missile strikes on whatever brings them over the border as soon as it does so if they have sufficient intel to track the movements?
Click to expand...
Those take many minutes to get from where they're fired to wherever they want to hit, so they're much better employed against fixed targets. Essentially they would have to know where and when the target is going to be in the future, rather than where it is now.
 
TMDaines said:
Just Putin’s war…

Click to expand...


Yep, was thinking the exact same thing. Imagining that it's just 'Putin's war' has always struck me as wishful, Pollyanna thinking. Sure, there will be intellectuals who will vehemently and eloquently oppose Putin, but they will be in the minority and easy to isolate.

Your average Russian will be captive to a propaganda machine that has been churning out abject nationalist drivel for the last twenty years. We shouldn't underestimate how immersive that is and how that attitude will become entrenched during a time when Russia is at war.
 
MTF said:
Those take many minutes to get from where they're fired to wherever they want to hit, so they're much better employed against fixed targets. Essentially they would have to know where and when the target is going to be in the future, rather than where it is now.
Click to expand...
unless you have a drone in the area giving life targeting info?
or as you say target the handover point
or more likley send in the rape squads and drop chemical weapons on kyiv till ukraine hand them over anyway as part of the denazification process
 
Revan said:
By all accounts, Belarus army is terrible and one of the worst in Europe. So I do not think Belarus sending troops in changes anything.

Unless Russia goes full WMD, I think they have already lost this war.
Click to expand...

They still have thermobarics as well.

The likeliest WMD scenario for Putin will be to batter Kyiv & Kharkiv as they have Mariupol, then instead of fighting a losing insurgency to take the full city, launch a false flag chemical attack that allows the Russians to walk in uncontested. That's the growing danger that needs to be mitigated by the Ukrainians and NATO need to be prepared on how to react when this happens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.