This…How stupid can you be to have voted for her?
Ever been to North Georgia?
This…How stupid can you be to have voted for her?
Ever been to North Georgia?
Northern Georgia and Northern Alabama (Mo Brooks country) form a corridor of stupid running East West.This…
I think the whole peace-keeping thing as I've defined it is moot anyway. This is because I don't see Putin agreeing to a military force that includes, for example, British troops (Britain having been proposed by Zelenskyy as one of the peace-guarantor nations) that have a mandate to fight against Russian troops if needed.
IMO Putin will only agree to some toothless force with fuzzy mandate that would collapse in 5 minutes if push comes to shove. He won't want to see hard-nosed, well-trained and well-equipped soldiers - soldiers who will actually fight if it comes it - adding to Ukraine's security.
So unfortunately I see a long-drawn out conflict, with no peace deal unless and until either (a) the Russians are driven back to their pre-February 24th positions; or (b) Putin is removed from power and new leader voluntarily withdraws the Russian troops.
This…
Chili’s represents a cultural Mecca in North Georgia.Unfortunately, we also have that kind of people North of the border, namely in rural Alberta.
Chili’s represents a cultural Mecca in North Georgia.
Northern Georgia and Northern Alabama (Mo Brooks country) form a corridor of stupid running East West.
At least we can claim that everyone gets represented -- including the stupids.
There will never ever be a traditional war between Putin's Russia and a NATO member. It's either peace or nukes, of that I am sure. So if a peace-keeping force is from a NATO member Russia would only attack if they are willing to go to nuclear war. You can give those troops BB guns the outcome would be the same.
Ever been to North Georgia?
This…
Northern Georgia and Northern Alabama (Mo Brooks country) form a corridor of stupid running East West.
This music belongs in the War Crimes thread. It's like Ukrainian Limp Bizkit.
Considering what horrors Russians has committed, I think we can say that Russia controlling any part of Ukraine in the long term is a guarantee of future genocide.Exactly. There’s no guarantee a peace deal will stop innocent folks being killed. A peace deal that results in Russian control of Ukrainian territory could actually lead to the exact opposite due to ethnic cleansing / genocide by the Russians.
Dead Man Walking...This music belongs in the War Crimes thread. It's like Ukrainian Limp Bizkit.
Yummy..don't talk like this when the midnight snack cravings are starting to kick in.And Cracker Barrel is fine dining*
*I do love me some CB mac and cheese.....
Yeah, I’m not so sure about it too.Please stop moving posts to other threads. It's so pointless.
gambling on regime change as a strategy is stupid. because it isn’t a sure shot and the guy replacing putin won’t be a peace loving leader. it could also mess things up more and push the country further into despair.
The year is 2022 and the German GREEN party is getting frustrated at their own country’s pace of lethal arms deliveries to Ukraine. Decades’ worth of change happening before our eyes.
Johnny is a Brit that has served with Ukrainian Marines for the last 4 years. He is in Mariupol, his twitter account was given to a friend for updates.
Multiple sources now claiming his unit has surrendered in Mariupol. There are are couple other vids from marines there in the last day however saying they are still holding and will fight to the last man.
Johnny is a Brit that has served with Ukrainian Marines for the last 4 years. He is in Mariupol, his twitter account was given to a friend for updates.
Multiple sources now claiming his unit has surrendered in Mariupol. There are are couple other vids from marines there in the last day however saying they are still holding and will fight to the last man.
You are talking bollocks. They are not outmatched in manpower. Not until Russia conducts full mobilisation which they cant unless they start calling this officially a war. Also, He wanted Ukraine but couldn't have it. That's why he retreated from the Kyiv area.Tbf I remember saying near the start of the war that Mariupol and more of Ukraine would fall, there was a lot of posts against that opinion due to the resistance being shown by Ukraine at the time.
In general my view on the war not changed, Ukraine can resist as much as they want (and it's very noble how they've done so), but in terms of manpower, military power and general resources they're badly outmatched and it's only a matter of time before they lose. The east will fall next, and then it just depends on Putin's whims as to how far he wants to go. The only thing up for debate is the timeline, it could take months, even years, but if he wants Ukraine he can have it. We have to remember we're only a month and a half into this, it could go on for years if Russia wants Ukraine bad enough.
The only thing that could stop it is aerial capability to actual fight the Russian air force, because giving them aerial superiority lets them dictate what whatever they want. But the west doesn't want to supply planes. Or if the sanctions actually made a noticeable difference to Russia, which they don't. A complete embargo on Russian gas and oil could do it (though even then it'd probably just be sold outside of Europe), but there's no political will in Germany etc to impose another 1000 euro cost per citizen (according to estimates).
You said this on March 11th, so give yourself a big ol’pat on the back.Tbf I remember saying near the start of the war that Mariupol and more of Ukraine would fall, there was a lot of posts against that opinion due to the resistance being shown by Ukraine at the time.
We shall see. As much as I wish Ukraine could hold them out, I don't see how it's feasible in any way. Mariupol will fall, there's no way it won't. It's already a dead city. Kharkiv will follow, and the Russians will push inland. Holding a city isn't particularly hard once you've conquered it - you replace the police force with your own, the administration etc - there'll be no one left to resist but ordinary people, who won't want to fight against an army for nothing. It may take longer than initially thought but those cities will soon go the way Kherson has.
Tbf I remember saying near the start of the war that Mariupol and more of Ukraine would fall, there was a lot of posts against that opinion due to the resistance being shown by Ukraine at the time.
In general my view on the war not changed, Ukraine can resist as much as they want (and it's very noble how they've done so), but in terms of manpower, military power and general resources they're badly outmatched and it's only a matter of time before they lose. The east will fall next, and then it just depends on Putin's whims as to how far he wants to go. The only thing up for debate is the timeline, it could take months, even years, but if he wants Ukraine he can have it. We have to remember we're only a month and a half into this, it could go on for years if Russia wants Ukraine bad enough.
The only thing that could stop it is aerial capability to actual fight the Russian air force, because giving them aerial superiority lets them dictate what whatever they want. But the west doesn't want to supply planes. Or if the sanctions actually made a noticeable difference to Russia, which they don't. A complete embargo on Russian gas and oil could do it (though even then it'd probably just be sold outside of Europe), but there's no political will in Germany etc to impose another 1000 euro cost per citizen (according to estimates).
Tbf I remember saying near the start of the war that Mariupol and more of Ukraine would fall, there was a lot of posts against that opinion due to the resistance being shown by Ukraine at the time.
In general my view on the war not changed, Ukraine can resist as much as they want (and it's very noble how they've done so), but in terms of manpower, military power and general resources they're badly outmatched and it's only a matter of time before they lose. The east will fall next, and then it just depends on Putin's whims as to how far he wants to go. The only thing up for debate is the timeline, it could take months, even years, but if he wants Ukraine he can have it. We have to remember we're only a month and a half into this, it could go on for years if Russia wants Ukraine bad enough.
The only thing that could stop it is aerial capability to actual fight the Russian air force, because giving them aerial superiority lets them dictate what whatever they want. But the west doesn't want to supply planes. Or if the sanctions actually made a noticeable difference to Russia, which they don't. A complete embargo on Russian gas and oil could do it (though even then it'd probably just be sold outside of Europe), but there's no political will in Germany etc to impose another 1000 euro cost per citizen (according to estimates).
Dictatorships may be more agile as the decision-making is centralized but the quality of the work will always be worse IMO. Too many yes-men, corruption etc.These kind of reports that emerged in the context of this war are what really gets up my hope for humanity. There is a lot of bad stuff happening all over the world. Some truly worrying people are in charge of powerful countries. But it becomes more and more apparent that while such regimes may be able to act quicker than democracies, they are corrupted by their own injustice and oppression, rendering them shockingly incompetent in many areas.
A month or so ago there was this unconfirmed whistle blower letter that suggested FSB analysts who would regularly report stuff their superiors didn't want to hear have their loyalty questioned. So when nothing was at stake, they just went with reporting positive stuff, contributing to a confirmation bias. And since none of them knew that a full blown war against Ukraine was even at the cards, they reported that the Ukrainian people were pro-Russia and that their economy was sanction-proof.
I think these are truly amazing insights. All this time the cynic in me used to think that dictatorships had this huge operational advantage over democracies since they could adapt their political course so much quicker. But now it becomes obvious that they're held back by their own corruption. If there's anything positive to take out of this war, for me it is this. Also in regards to China.
Dictatorships may be more agile as the decision-making is centralized but the quality of the work will always be worse IMO. Too many yes-men, corruption etc.