shamans
Thinks you can get an STD from flirting.
With the amount of resources western powers have, how has no one been able to poison Putin? Surely it shouldn't be a question of morals. One life of a crazy man vs thousands of innocents?
Same way we never poisoned Castro. Difficult to get someone / turn someone in that tight circle at the upper echelon of staff.With the amount of resources western powers have, how has no one been able to poison Putin? Surely it shouldn't be a question of morals. One life of a crazy man vs thousands of innocents?
Same way we never poisoned Castro. Difficult to get someone / turn someone in that tight circle at the upper echelon of staff.
I agree, we should be able to undertake something that has massive plausible deniability. Until then we have to hope for a successful von Stauffenberg.Billions are spent on military aid. Everyone has a price. Surely $300 million to a close member isn't that big of a deal. Also, the precision in some of the modern weaponry out there is insane. Things you can fit in a pocket to carry out the task. I feel it can't be an issue logistically.
Look at how many times Putin himself failed to poison his opponents with undetectable military-grade chemical weapons.Billions are spent on military aid. Everyone has a price. Surely $300 million to a close member isn't that big of a deal. Also, the precision in some of the modern weaponry out there is insane. Things you can fit in a pocket to carry out the task. I feel it can't be an issue logistically.
Well, I guess I'm in the minority then. I'll just leave at that. If I happen to find the report I'll post it here, maybe there's something more to it that what the reporter said. If it was just for posting shit on facebook, It just sounds extremely abusive.
Look at how many times Putin himself failed to poison his opponents with undetectable military-grade chemical weapons.
And you do realize that it’s $300 mil (which isn’t an overwhelmingly lot for his close circle) for a suicide mission as, if caught, this person never gets out of there alive.
Billions are spent on military aid. Everyone has a price. Surely $300 million to a close member isn't that big of a deal. Also, the precision in some of the modern weaponry out there is insane. Things you can fit in a pocket to carry out the task. I feel it can't be an issue logistically.
Are you feeling ok? What the feck are you on about?
What’s your theory for why it hasn’t happened?
Fear. Socially not acceptable. If it leaks that they did it, it will be chaos and legitimize Putin.
I guess the frontlines are simply very slow-moving. The Ukrainians might trade land here and there to stretch the Russians and then start a counter-attack (defend in depth).I have the feeling that even with all the news that the UA army is detroying this and that and nothing from the RA, and all the positive and no negative, when i see maps and comments i only see gains from the RA and barely gains for the UA besides the botch attempt in kiyv.
What is the real developement of the war? Is RA winning? The UA? Or there is stalling positions?
Wasn’t your previous post in this thread about a Russian acquaintance being refused service in a London restaurant (something I have not heard from any Russian acquaintances in Western Europe)? Given the overwhelmingly black and white nature of this conflict, it’s somewhat strange you seem more focused on “victims” on the invader’s side.
The Donbas front seems to be mostly stalling and turned into a war of attrition. With the influx of more (and more sophisticated compared to their Russian opponents) western heavy weapons Ukraine should be able to hold their positions until the Russian attack just collapses like we have seen in Kiyv.I have the feeling that even with all the news that the UA army is detroying this and that and nothing from the RA, and all the positive and no negative, when i see maps and comments i only see gains from the RA and barely gains for the UA besides the botch attempt in kiyv.
What is the real developement of the war? Is RA winning? The UA? Or there is stalling positions?
The conflict itself is black and white, no doubt about it, the russians are the bad guys and ukranians are the victims. I just feel more compelled to comment about something a few dozen people before me haven't commented on yet, because I'd basically be saying the same thing.
You won't find a post from me blaming any ukranian victims, which was what the post I commented on suggested I was doing. A bit offensive to be honest.
What you are doing is meaningless. Perhaps you misunderstand what is going on in real life.
Try to understand what a big war like this means in reality, not in imagination. During a war, all the worse scum of society try to gain whatever they can. This is true in all wars, in all populations. I am sure there are scum Ukrainians, too. During normal times, in Ukraine (as in any country) there are people who steal, who murder, who rape, and of course there are police officers who overstep the proper boundaries. Do those people disappear during a war? On the contrary, the scum is more free to do whatever shit they were doing before, exactly because of the war. So, every problem becomes worse in a war. The reason for this war is Russia, and we should blame Russia for any of that, too! There is absolutely no point trying to find problems in Ukrainian society, this is irrelevant now (and I mean for us, the external observers). It is like talking about someone's bad haircut when we know they have terminal cancer.
Once Russia take the steel works, I think they'll declare the mission is over and keep those Eastern areas.
It has huge legal implications. For example at the moment soldiers can theoretically just quit their job if they don't want to go to Ukraine and there's nothing their officers can legally do about it, except trying some shady blackmailing. And this happens, although it's not clear how big the numbers are. But Strelkov already publicly complained about that.I'm not clear on the significance of Russia potentially "declaring war". Anyone? I mean it's so obviously a full on war already, only (some of) the Russian population might be fooled into believing they are not waging a war in Ukraine, but what might such a declaration really mean, especially in the face of them saying of course they aren't going to declare war (as if they'd do such a thing).
They want full occupation of Ukraine and that's not going to happen either. So I think at this point it’s not so much about what Russia really wants but more abou what they consider as the acceptable minimum to end this war they never wanted.You don't think they'll also want to declare full occupation of the Donbas region?
You don't think they'll also want to declare full occupation of the Donbas region?
Right now, purely symbolic for the Ukrainians.What is so important about this steel plant they've been fighting for for weeks? Is it just symbolic for the russians/ukranians or what?
Right now, purely symbolic for the Ukrainians.
Azovstal is the last resistance in the huge coastal area from Russia to Crimea. Establishing this land connection was one of the main objectives for Russia, as there is only one bridge connecting Crimea to Russia before this war, and that bridge might be quite vulnerable to attacks. Fully occupying Mariupol means Crimea is safely connected and not vulnerable to single attacks on one bridge.What is so important about this steel plant they've been fighting for for weeks? Is it just symbolic for the russians/ukranians or what?
What is so important about this steel plant they've been fighting for for weeks? Is it just symbolic for the russians/ukranians or what?
Azovstal is the last resistance in the huge coastal area from Russia to Crimea. Establishing this land connection was one of the main objectives for Russia, as there is only one bridge connecting Crimea to Russia before this war, and that bridge might be quite vulnerable to attacks. Fully occupying Mariupol means Crimea is safely connected and not vulnerable to single attacks on one bridge.
I guess the frontlines are simply very slow-moving. The Ukrainians might trade land here and there to stretch the Russians and then start a counter-attack (defend in depth).
Also, Ukraine doesn't seem to have massive offensive capabilities, so they're still waging a defensive style of war out of necessity.
That's the impression I currently have.