Or you go in if you've aready done it.
Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion
- Thread starter Wednesday at Stoke
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
At least Russian liberal “opposition” won’t be able to call it as Putin’s war anymore.
That 100 percent will happen. That’s why Russia are talking about not bluffing and all that nonsense in a desperate attempt to stop it happening
Still feel terrible that Ukraine fights on their own as far as the human risk in this conflict. They've proven themselves the opposite of a lost cause like the former Afghan government, or further back the Republic of Vietnam, who were governments with little actual support of the population.
If Putin gets on TV and already tells his people that they're fighting the west, how escalatory would it even be if that were simply made to become reality? Or to look at it from a different angle, would the costs of Ukraine losing/having to agree to a stalemate without parts of it's territory also not be an unsustainable peace? I think that Russian aggression would likely reoccur within a decade at most.
I think there's a mismatch in terms of the strategic significance of this conflict (indirectly will define the security situation in Eastern Europe for a decade or longer, implications for global security) and the current commitment of US/NATO resources. I think the deployment of aerial, anti-air, logistics support, intelligence, and any other sort of units short of armor (explicit commitment not to violate Russian territory with ground units and no use of strategic bombers) to support Ukraine should be considered. Even while I know that the actual answer is that none of this will be considered or done.
If Putin gets on TV and already tells his people that they're fighting the west, how escalatory would it even be if that were simply made to become reality? Or to look at it from a different angle, would the costs of Ukraine losing/having to agree to a stalemate without parts of it's territory also not be an unsustainable peace? I think that Russian aggression would likely reoccur within a decade at most.
I think there's a mismatch in terms of the strategic significance of this conflict (indirectly will define the security situation in Eastern Europe for a decade or longer, implications for global security) and the current commitment of US/NATO resources. I think the deployment of aerial, anti-air, logistics support, intelligence, and any other sort of units short of armor (explicit commitment not to violate Russian territory with ground units and no use of strategic bombers) to support Ukraine should be considered. Even while I know that the actual answer is that none of this will be considered or done.
I think this is merely a ploy from Putin to try and stop the rapid counter offensive from the Ukranian forces. They will potentially now have to think about what they can hold in a spring offensive from Russia, once it get's these mobilised troops into position.
They have to take a calculated gamble to stop and consolidate now before winter sets in hard, or do they go for the jugular and hope the mobilized troops are as poorly led and badly motivated as the current Russian soldiers have been.
Personally I think you can't "normalise" Putin's behaviour and let him hold these fragments of territory. Some rapidly "rebadged" resources need to suddenly appear on the battlefield to establish total air supremacy and a squadron of A10's to raze the remaining Russian forces will force widespread mutiny and collapse within a week. It would just be a question of where to draw the line - Crimea??
They have to take a calculated gamble to stop and consolidate now before winter sets in hard, or do they go for the jugular and hope the mobilized troops are as poorly led and badly motivated as the current Russian soldiers have been.
Personally I think you can't "normalise" Putin's behaviour and let him hold these fragments of territory. Some rapidly "rebadged" resources need to suddenly appear on the battlefield to establish total air supremacy and a squadron of A10's to raze the remaining Russian forces will force widespread mutiny and collapse within a week. It would just be a question of where to draw the line - Crimea??
But it’s not though? There’s precedent for what I posted there, it’s a major difference.
There's probably some truth in that. If Ukraine know a load more troops are potentially on the way, they're more likely to consolidate positions rather than counterattack and risk being exposed. They'll still look to take strategic cities back I imagine.
Thanks- I should have looked it up first - but dont know anything bout Russian history. Its just something I have never read about.
These guys just had their most prestigious field army level formation (1st Guard Tanks Army) partially routed. I don't think that conscripts will display higher morale, determination or skill in holding against future offensives.
A reverse historical precedent that comes to mind is the Battle of the Bulge, where after a few US line divisions were defeated by German forces, at least what the generals had in strategic reserve to rapidly deploy and hold the new line + Bastogne were the mostly volunteer 82nd and 101st airborne divisions.
A reverse historical precedent that comes to mind is the Battle of the Bulge, where after a few US line divisions were defeated by German forces, at least what the generals had in strategic reserve to rapidly deploy and hold the new line + Bastogne were the mostly volunteer 82nd and 101st airborne divisions.
Kofman’s usually cautious analysis doesn’t see this as any sort of game changer until at least the medium term:
You probably already know the main names and storyline without being aware. For example Rasputin, The Bolsheviks, the ‘reds’ vs ‘white’ army, Lenin etc. the film Anastasia
If this translation is correct she is spot on, there is nothing partial about it besides the name. The only limiting factors are age and health reasons. To me this sounds like a general mobilization and the next step after this would be declaring martial law.
Good assessment from Hertling as usual. And another reason why Putin's so called mobilization is little more than a final act of desperation rather than one that will turn the tide back in Russia's favor.
Last edited:
I'm not sure Russian mobilisation will necessarily lead to Ukrainians stoping their offensive in short term, and by short term I mean next couple of weeks. If anything, they may look to launch new offensives soon to liberate more territory before Russian extra men arrive.
She is spot on, she's about as thorough as they get.
From what I heard from acquaintances it used to be piss easy to bribe yourself out of the military service. @harms do you think those that have done so will still be drafted now?
It certainly was very easy, especially in wealthier regions. I'm not sure how hard it is to prove that someone cheated their way out of conscription — usually a doctor in the army-affiliated facility or an army officer at the conscription office were bribed to get a fake medical diagnosis that get you expelled from service. Unless those particular people were caught red-handed, which happens sometimes (and triggers a retrospective reassessment of their previous cases), it's pretty tough to prove foul play.
I doubt that they'll have the time to check old cases and issue those reassessments on those who are already expelled from service. It'll take so much time as you'll have to prove that their medical evaluation was not legit (which, most likely, means a couple of weeks in an army's hospital to check everything out for themselves).
That makes sense. Thanks for the thorough answer!
Very unfortunate that Finland still have the border open.
Why? Anyone that makes it across can't be pressed into fighting for Putin...
Am I getting this right, are you posting untrue things as part of a campaign to support Ukraine on Redcafe? Sorry if I misunderstood.
I just love these kind of videos. Every time there's an anti-Putin protest pro-Putin guys come in to argue for him and to provoke a negative reaction (and, ideally, a fight). And almost every time the police that was instructed to detain every member of the protest grabs them despite them shouting that it's a misunderstanding.
1st video
https://t.me/lentachold/53190
2nd video
https://t.me/lentachold/53192
1st video
https://t.me/lentachold/53190
2nd video
https://t.me/lentachold/53192
Surely for each side it’s now a case of grabbing as much land as quickly as possible before winter sets in? Offensives are going to be significantly more difficult in the cold and winter would provide a cooling off to dig in along the front lines.
What's your point here? Anyone who was in Russia on the 24th of Februar should fight to their death? Please answer in words if you can.
True. But what if all those cars turned around and headed for the Kremlin to oust that dictator. That would be fighting for your country, in the truest sense.
No, I’m just not that bothered about fact checking the information if it comes from Ukrainian minded sources when sharing it, so you have to take it with a pinch of salt. I’m a victim of Ukrainian propaganda.
This is fake though.
It's fake.
That would be better but you can't ask everyone to become a martyr.
I can't blame those people of course, running is the easiest option. However, if not them, who are supposed to fix this mess? Us? Majority of people in that queue were completely fine with everything that happened up until they got affected personally, they had like 7 months to leave and chose not to. You can be sure that a big amount of people there are similar clowns to the picture I posted, who will continue spreading their nonsense living in Finland or wherever.
What's your point here? Anyone who was in Russia on the 24th of Februar should fight to their death? Please answer in words if you can.
Good if so.
Seems to be more of journalists than protesters.