I get what you are saying but into this we need to take into affect that the medical staff of hospitals were so much better equipped and the knowledge of the disease was much better then when it started so it isn't just that everyone was vaccinated. The virus had also mutated so the difference isn't all down to the vaccination. Many factors to take into the account.That’s just not true. How can you still think this? From the day the first results came out the most important measure of effectiveness has always been how vaccines keep people from getting severe disease (i.e. ending up in hospital, in ICU, or dead)
You say you were floored by covid. Did you end up in hospital? If not, you didn’t get severe covid. That might have happened to you without being vaccinated but you’re definitely not an example of a vaccine failing to be effective.
Like I said it's not that I am against it and as a matter of fact many of my close relatives are doctors and nurses who worked in the ICU units during the first wave so I was fully on board. Since then some of them have started doubting this hard line that was taken and the results that are being published.
I would say that I got hit pretty hard, the booster jab affected my heart rhythm and it stopped beating for 4 minutes where I was by the doctors account dead. When I got COVID I was out for 14 days and really sick for about 3 weeks were I spent 4 days in hospital. I still have post COVID issues like irregular heart rhythm, tiredness and head aches that I never got before.
I get that it's a complicated matter and I am pro science but there is something there that doesn't sit right.
Wouldn’t agree with the bold either as a lot of people in their twenties and thirties also died especially during the delta wave.
Of course people of all age died but the young weren't hit hard by it. My kids age 12 and 15 were vaccinated even after they got COVID. As no one deared to ask questions. Not saying I'm right but this has got me thinking a lot about this.
Last edited: