The Corinthian
I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2020
- Messages
- 12,088
- Supports
- A Free Palestine
- Caf Award
- Best Newbie Promoted 2021
Before I post, what’s the forum rules on wishing harm and/or death on people?
I wish her a career ending injuryBefore I post, what’s the forum rules on wishing harm and/or death on people?
I had never heard about him before today, and I don't live in Britain, but my ideologue radar didn't immediately go off. I feel like it's quite symptomatic of the current information landscape that you find it accurare and others call it ideologically driven nonsense. I don't know what to think now![]()
Heartily encouraged in her case.Before I post, what’s the forum rules on wishing harm and/or death on people?
Conversely, I wouldn’t wish her on any disease.Before I post, what’s the forum rules on wishing harm and/or death on people?
She’s just smelled what she’s shovelling
The left aren’t allowed to get their hands dirty like that. It’s a moral outrage when they do.Priti Patel alluding to corruption when discussing party gate and Boris and sue gray on a gb news clip earlier. How about someone from the left accuse her to her face if her corrupt ppe dealings. Then the world would cave in with outrage at the sheer audacity of accusing her.
The left need to start throwing punches the way the right do.
The Tories just can't resist giving a big tax cut to the very (as far as I'm concerned) wealthy, every single budget. This time in tax relief on pension contributions, just when everyone else's tax is actually going up because of the continued freezing of personal allowances. The excuse is to stop surgeons retiring early, which they could have addressed by raising surgeon's wages or increasing their government pension contributions, ie without giving every very high earner in the country a big tax cut. But they're Tories, that's what they do.
I doubt if they'll have to wait until 2025 either.
Remember the Tapered Annual Allowance applies so people earning £360k+ per annum still only get tax relief on £10k pension contributions per annum (admittedly up from £4k per annum previously). Between £260k and £360k you "lose" £1 of tax relief for every £2 earned.
It would be very difficult to get tax relief on a pension pot above the £1.073m pre-budget limit whilst only getting relief on £10k per year.
It's a tax cut on the upper middle classes (and middle classes in London) rather than the very wealthy. Although "very wealthy" is subjective of course.
£360k a year is very wealthy and it's a symptom of a broken economic system that that isn't necessarily thought of as being the case. If you're earning 10x the average salary, by anybody's view you should be considered very wealthy. I think when that law was proposed in Switzerland it was that nobody at a company should earn more than 12x what the lowest paid worker earned. I think the more recognised number might be 20x. Either way, you're well on your way towards that.
The point was just that people on £360k per annum wouldn't benefit from the change. It's people on £125k - £250k who'll benefit the most (especially those with large, usually public sector, pensions on top).
So in other words ministers and MPs with 2nd jobs. Great.
Oh, 100%. For clarity I don't agree with the policy.
The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months. Don’t forget that they won the last election at a canter on the Brexit vote, and that’s exactly who they’re aiming at winning back with these anti-immigrant policies.
Especially if they bring people in numbers over to Rwanda, it will be a problem for Labour to win.The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months. Don’t forget that they won the last election at a canter on the Brexit vote, and that’s exactly who they’re aiming at winning back with these anti-immigrant policies.
What?The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months. Don’t forget that they won the last election at a canter on the Brexit vote, and that’s exactly who they’re aiming at winning back with these anti-immigrant policies.
What?
What?
What?
Neither am I but I think it's up to you to back up your original point, that 'The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months'. Is it true or not?To sure how reliable that poll is
They don't have the media behind them. There would be wholesale condemnation for such a statement.Priti Patel alluding to corruption when discussing party gate and Boris and sue gray on a gb news clip earlier. How about someone from the left accuse her to her face if her corrupt ppe dealings. Then the world would cave in with outrage at the sheer audacity of accusing her.
The left need to start throwing punches the way the right do.
Neither am I but I think it's up to you to back up your original point, that 'The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months'. Is it true or not?
Neither am I but I think it's up to you to back up your original point, that 'The Tories have been steadily rising in the polls the last few months'. Is it true or not?
Thanks. The recent uptick is quite small then. Can't be arsed looking at what caused the November lows, it was always unlikely they would stay. But then again I try to never rule anything out in politics, been surprised too many times.It's not quite steady and it's from an incredibly low base but...
![]()
Thanks. The recent uptick is quite small then. Can't be arsed looking at what caused the November lows, it was always unlikely they would stay. But then again I try to never rule anything out in politics, been surprised too many times.
“I don’t want Pride sex flags along my high street."
Looks like the xenophobic/racist/fascist culture wars are starting to work for the Tories then.It's not quite steady and it's from an incredibly low base but...
![]()