Source:
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2022/23 | Follow the OP rules and check the quality of your sources before posting. STAY ON TOPIC!
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
- Status
Source:
Merely improving on our current situation won’t lead us anywhere. Mid table standard strikers would improve us but nowhere near enough.
yes, but what are our options?
As things stand, Kane is not happening. Osimhen would cost too much and we can't afford him. Kolo Muani is overpriced and Hojlund is too young. And to top it off, Bayern, Real and Chelsea are also looking for top striker themselves.
So realistically a fit CF who can score 15 goals and a couple of assists is going to be a huge improvement on our current Martial/Weghorst situation.
With that being said, all things point to Voldemort being brought into the set up.
Hojilund can get 15 goals I believe at the very least imo.
Much rather Hojlund than Ramos. Looks like there is much more to him than Ramos. You can see the movement and speed. Can't see anything with Ramos.
Source (Tier 1): Loïc Tanzi
Newspaper snippet:
Tier 1 - Ohhh Boy! Imagine that Defence!
And you do??? Feck off!
That’s a super crappy list.
Looks realistic except for Costa, but my guess would be:
Hojlund
Mount
Kim
(Maybe Rabiot if his mum isn't a pain too)
100m for a 30yr old striker with 1yr left on his contract would be fecking nuts. Something similar to what we paid for RVP would be acceptable for me
Varane, Martinez and Pavard would be incredible
We need someone as a striker who can score at the very least 30 goals in all competitions
Funnily enough, what we paid for RVP at the time was considered a little high considering his contract situation.
11 years later, we're not getting Kane for anything close to that.
Based on the 9 goals in 32 games he scored this season at Serie A level?
Based on potential and recent showings worth a punt over the likes of Martial
James Ducker co-authored the article, so this is a huge development.
This one is happening then. We'll be funding their purchase of Ugarte then
I like Mount just hope the fee is not too ridiculous.
Small price to pay to get rid of the big lump. Hopefully make it back selling Elanga who is no where near up to standard either.
He's going to stripped of the captaincy, he probably wants out and we need to move him on. We don't need to keep paying wages for someone who isn't good enoughAre we really that desperate to move him on?
Do not want. Hopefully Chelsea ask f u money and we see sense
Regardless of what people think of this potential transfer, good to see business being done early
I get selling him, best for both parties but surely there will be takers. We’re already likely to lose millions on his value, we’re gonna chuck another 10m down the drain too?!
Didn’t you post this last summer about Frenkie?
If he's as desperate to move on as we are to get rid of him, there's no reason for us to pay him to leave.
Isn't the mail blacklisted? Why are we posting their bullshit on here?
Wheeler is a decent source
He's got 3 years left on his deal. He'll cost the club 30 million in wages alone. Take the hit and save 20 is best outcome.
Personal terms won't be the issue, it will be Chelsea's valuation I fear.
Weird one, beyond the HG, PL 'tested' (and he's tested pretty poorly this season) and 'hard-working' elements. There are players (apparently) available for around 40m or under who are similar ages or younger, more press resistant, quicker, better passers.
It'd be one thing if we were supplementing a fully modernized midfield with MM on a free transfer or something to play 2-3 roles in rotation, but seems an odd profile for recruitment given where the team's at, current restrictions on spending and the rest. At least this means we're more likely to let DVB and a couple of the fringe players like Elanga go...
It'd be one thing if we were supplementing a fully modernized midfield with MM on a free transfer or something to play 2-3 roles in rotation, but seems an odd profile for recruitment given where the team's at, current restrictions on spending and the rest. At least this means we're more likely to let DVB and a couple of the fringe players like Elanga go...
Potentially.Didn’t you post this last summer about Frenkie?
But then again, usually once personal terms are agreed it’s usually a go-er with the club.
Last year it was the other way round
Potentially.
But then again, usually once personal terms are agreed it’s usually a go-er with the club.
Last year it was the other way round
Personal terms almost always come firstPotentially.
But then again, usually once personal terms are agreed it’s usually a go-er with the club.
Last year it was the other way round
- Status