RedDevilQuebecois
New Member
- Joined
- May 27, 2021
- Messages
- 8,256
His arrogance remained intact until the very end, that's for sure. He just could not lay low.
No idea if legit.
Can't be repeated enough.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2023/0...ess-in-the-last-72-hours-the-white-house-saysUkrainian forces have made “notable progress” in their counteroffensive over the last 72 hours, notching wins against the second line of Russian defenders, a White House spokesman, John F. Kirby, said at a news conference on Friday.
The United States, Mr. Kirby said, will not discuss Ukraine’s war plans, or how its forces would exploit their gains. But, he added, the U.S. expects Ukraine to continue to push further south, requiring “tough fighting ahead.”
TLDR? Because it's Tucker Carlsson and no way clicking it.
I just listened to the beginning and NONE of the things they say match what I have seen on all other sources.
The numbers of Ukrainian losses are about 10 times higher than anywhere else reported.
The claim of Russian technological superiority is definitely false.
The claim of an unready US army is questionable at best.
At best these are the ramblings of an old man that claims everything was better in his days.
I only noticed one true statement, that the US for a long time did not fight an equal enemy instead of an insurgency. But I think he just doesn't realize that a war US/NATO vs Russia would be exactly that at this point - devastating massive air strikes on Russia would quickly turn Russian resistence into an insurgency.
Also interestingly typical for this kind of commentator that guy is ignoring logistics (which Russia is terrible at) but focussing on their ammo stocks and production (which might indeed be quite well).
Mike Flynn was a three star general. Doesn't mean he's not a stone cold moron. MacGregor used to go on RT regularly and is clearly still on the Russian payroll. There's a reason he's showing up on Tucker's youtube channel and Fox News. MacGregor was saying that Russia was on the verge of defeating Ukraine three days into the war and that they'd be annihilated if they didn't surrender. Why would anyone take him seriously?
The conversation about Ukraine’s counteroffensive has shifted from one of excitement to disappointment, as Kyiv’s slow gains lead some U.S. officials and insiders alike to whisper: Should we have listened to Gen. MARK MILLEY?
In November, the Joint Chiefs chair said Ukraine’s strong military position and upcoming winter season combined to make a good time to consider peace talks. Plus, operations to expel Russian forces out of the whole of Ukraine –— which VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY demands — had a slim chance of success. Administration officials immediately scrambled to assure their counterparts in Kyiv that Milley was riffing and not reflecting a secret sentiment in the White House.
The official view from Pentagon seems to be that Ukraine had more leverage militarily last winter, and should have pressed for peace talks then.... which seems to imply that that they're LOSING on the ground since then. Congrats to all who waved the Ukraine flag and invoked its people as they attacked and smeared diplomacy.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/national-security-daily/2023/08/18/milley-had-a-point-00111878
Of course the Admin is pressing on with fighting Russia until the last Ukrainian
The official view from Pentagon seems to be that Ukraine had more leverage militarily last winter, and should have pressed for peace talks then.... which seems to imply that that they're LOSING on the ground since then. Congrats to all who waved the Ukraine flag and invoked its people as they attacked and smeared diplomacy.
Is this the type of media you prefer?
The official view from Pentagon seems to be that Ukraine had more leverage militarily last winter, and should have pressed for peace talks then.... which seems to imply that that they're LOSING on the ground since then. Congrats to all who waved the Ukraine flag and invoked its people as they attacked and smeared diplomacy.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/national-security-daily/2023/08/18/milley-had-a-point-00111878
Of course the Admin is pressing on with fighting Russia until the last Ukrainian
He's a very low quality poster, best ignored.
The official view from Pentagon seems to be that Ukraine had more leverage militarily last winter, and should have pressed for peace talks then.... which seems to imply that that they're LOSING on the ground since then. Congrats to all who waved the Ukraine flag and invoked its people as they attacked and smeared diplomacy.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/national-security-daily/2023/08/18/milley-had-a-point-00111878
Of course the Admin is pressing on with fighting Russia until the last Ukrainian
It is hard to imagine how Ukr can trust Putin after all of it.
But negotiation would be the aim to end this war in the favor of UKR? How else can this war end instead realistically unless Putin is dead?
Well they'll be hoping to force the Russians to retreat out of Ukraine fully. Whether it's realistic or even possible well time will tell but they want to try and so far they're gradually progressing towards that goal.
Its definitely going to take a lot of time, how long until mud season starts in southern Ukraine, 1 month or so?
British tanks Eddie, best in the worldThat's quite the vote of confidence.