There is a Challenger 3 project. But interestingly it wouldn't mean producing new tanks, but refurbishing the existing Challenger 2 fleet - key point would be replacing the gun, effectively taking this "sniper" ability away from it, by using the 120mm/L55A1 smoothbore gun. Which is the same (but modernized) gun the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams use. This would effectively bring the British tank fleet to NATO standard and ease cooperation, but it also changes it's abilities a bit.They no longer make the Challenger 2 do they? Maybe they should restart production or is there another one in the works or something?
The Challenger 3 is due 2027.They no longer make the Challenger 2 do they? Maybe they should restart production or is there another one in the works or something?
There is a Challenger 3 project. But interestingly it wouldn't mean producing new tanks, but refurbishing the existing Challenger 2 fleet - key point would be replacing the gun, effectively taking this "sniper" ability away from it, by using the 120mm/L55A1 smoothbore gun. Which is the same (but modernized) gun the Leopard 2 and M1 Abrams use. This would effectively bring the British tank fleet to NATO standard and ease cooperation, but it also changes it's abilities a bit.
Depends on the version. It always has short range missiles as main weapons, but some variants additionally have autocannons.Is a Pantsir an automated cannon system then?
"We spit on Western sanctions."
"Let me speak. Otherwise, you will really hear what Russian Grad missiles are capable of."
"Morons" - preceded by an expletive.
In the newly published interview, the pilot also pushed back against Russian misinformation about the invasion of Ukraine.
“The truth is, there are no Nazis or fascists here. It’s a real disgrace what is happening here. Murder, tears, blood. People are simply killing each other. That’s all I can make of this and I don’t want to be a part of it,” he said.
That high-level cases of corruption are coming to light is positive, said Andrii Borovyk, director of Transparency International in Ukraine, rather than an indication of a nation bogged down by insider dealing; it shows that the country can fight the war and graft at the same time, he said.
“Scandals are good,” he said. “The war,” Mr. Borovyk added, “cannot be an excuse to stop fighting corruption.”
Good to see them in the fight at least. Presumably, the media and whoever is going to make a massive fuss about it being the first one ever destroyed, and its loss in general without knowing anything about what it accomplished.
Would think highly likely unless it's a direct artillery hit, the issue with the Russian tanks is the ammo has an autoloader from what I read so a good hit will cause the whole thing to explode, the turret to usually pop off and the crew have no chance. Challenger's have ammo that explodes outwards so might well be what we're seeing in the vid (Forbes article was where I read this)The most important question is what happened to the crew. Did they survive this? If yes then it did well despite getting lost. And considering that so far no Leo 2 crew member died there is hope that the Challenger also protects its crew well enough against Russian weapons
True, but it has to be said that an autoloader as such is not the problem, but the fact that the currently used T-tanks store their ammo in the same area the crew populates. It is possible to build autoloaders that also utilize safe storage compartments and blowout panels.Would think highly likely unless it's a direct artillery hit, the issue with the Russian tanks is the ammo has an autoloader from what I read so a good hit will cause the whole thing to explode, the turret to usually pop off and the crew have no chance. Challenger's have ammo that explodes outwards so might well be what we're seeing in the vid (Forbes article was where I read this)
Of course the Russian embassy was gonna jump on the Challenger tank loss.