So Jordan who already called their ambassador from Tel Aviv are now defying the Israeli imposed siege on Gaza in order to keep their field hospital from shutting down.
Nah it was obviously in coordination in Israel.
Palestians dont deserve their own state?As a Jew, I consider those ethnically cleansed before/during WWII to be the lucky ones. Had the ethnic cleansing been more aggressive and faster, less would have died. I wish there had been far more. The Jews largely didn't go in the 30s because they were stubborn bastards who believed they would never get slaughtered and things would get better, and they paid the ultimate price. And the Nazis ended up having to kill the Jews because they have nowhere to realistically put them. Ethnic cleansing has traditionally been a positive for Jews throughout history too, from Edward I throughout medieval times. Slaughter was sometimes followed by expulsion, but often it was the other way around as they would move before they could be slaughtered. Jews have been running for 2000 years; by and large the biggest death counts and highest brutality have been when they didn't know when to run. (Lets not forget the punishment in Palestine itself after they managed to destroy [probably] two legions.) You could easily frame the Bar Kokhba struggle as similar to the Palestinian one and look how that ended for the Jews... And as a sailor in modern times I've seen people protected from slaughter by running. I respect that you have a completely different outlook on it but I genuinely believe it can sometimes be the best option.
It's not that I believe they aren't worthy of it, it's that I believe it can't realistically happen for the reasons I stated. I didn't say they aren't civilized enough, just that they won't get it. Lebanon barely have autonomy, and Israel attacks whenever it chooses with regularity. Why would a Palestinian state be any different? And why would a Palestinian state already in the grip of Iran be any more resistant to their influence than other states in the region? It's not about them needing to be controlled for their own good, its just what would happen. The bolded though I'll grant you is true in my eyes, and will be for a generation or more now.
Would you say a state on the lines of the Camp David agreement be acceptable now? Because it wouldn't ever get any better for the forseeable future. Even if you could get them to the table and get rid of Bibi, Israel could barely offer that much, certainly not more.
Utterly Awful. Palestianuam children dont matter to them do they? 4000 dead from the bombing. Its a irrelevant number to them. They dont care.There’s also this:
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2023/7/10/palestinian-children-abused-in-israeli-detention-ngo
Palestinian children abused in Israeli detention: NGO
Some of the abuses are sexual in nature, in addition to being beaten, handcuffed and blindfolded, a report says.
The study said 86 percent of the 228 former child detainees surveyed were beaten in detention, and 69 percent were strip-searched, adding that 42 percent were injured at the point of arrest, including gunshot wounds and broken bones.
They were also interrogated at unknown locations without the presence of a guardian or caregiver and are often deprived of food, water and sleep, the report says.
The report says: “The main alleged crime for these detentions is stone-throwing, which can carry a 20-year sentence in prison for Palestinian children.
There was another report I’ve posted about which showed that 40% of Palestinian children detained by the Israelis are sexually abused. It seems to be a bit of a theme with the Israeli IDF/Police force.
That's not what he said.Palestians dont deserve their own state?
Pro genocide arguement.
Your posts are awful on this thread.
The opposition (?) leader a similar amount and the most popular figure is currently in jail in Israel for terrorism. She was keen to say the main reason he was viewed as popular is that he ran as very anti-corruption: similar reason why Hamas was elected in the first place.
But it does say to me that the two-state solution is basically f*cked. How do you convince Israel that either Hamas or a leader that is literally in jail right now for terrorism is a safe bet? The Iranian leadership must be dancing a jig every day with how things are going.
That's not what he said.
France had its own way and weight in international matters in general and the palestinian question in particular.
Despite its lack of weight, France had a voice that was listened to and appreciated in the arab world. Partly due to its colonial past and relations to the new arab countries, and but mostly because an international policy initially defined by De Gaulle who didn't want to see France, and Europe by extension, chained to the US. Hence his initial resistance to the inclusion of Britain into what will become the EU, which he saw as the US Trojan Horse, and his contempt about the UN.
I think that Sarkozy destroyed this "third path" with his disastrous adventure in Lybia. The 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris buried it. There's also been no french statesman worth their salt since Chirac, for all his flaws. Sarkozy was a wheeler-dealer, Hollande was elected because he wasn't Sarkozy, just like Biden wasn't Trump. Macron, well, you know much more about him than I do. I logged out of french politics after Hollande was elected.
C'est ce que je pense personellement. Si je raconte des conneries, tu es libre de me corriger.
You're talking with the benefit of hindsight.As a Jew, I consider those ethnically cleansed before/during WWII to be the lucky ones. Had the ethnic cleansing been more aggressive and faster, less would have died. I wish there had been far more. The Jews largely didn't go in the 30s because they were stubborn bastards who believed they would never get slaughtered and things would get better, and they paid the ultimate price. And the Nazis ended up having to kill the Jews because they have nowhere to realistically put them. Ethnic cleansing has traditionally been a positive for Jews throughout history too, from Edward I throughout medieval times. Slaughter was sometimes followed by expulsion, but often it was the other way around as they would move before they could be slaughtered. Jews have been running for 2000 years; by and large the biggest death counts and highest brutality have been when they didn't know when to run. (Lets not forget the punishment in Palestine itself after they managed to destroy [probably] two legions.) You could easily frame the Bar Kokhba struggle as similar to the Palestinian one and look how that ended for the Jews... And as a sailor in modern times I've seen people protected from slaughter by running. I respect that you have a completely different outlook on it but I genuinely believe it can sometimes be the best option.
It's not that I believe they aren't worthy of it, it's that I believe it can't realistically happen for the reasons I stated. I didn't say they aren't civilized enough, just that they won't get it. Lebanon barely have autonomy, and Israel attacks whenever it chooses with regularity. Why would a Palestinian state be any different? And why would a Palestinian state already in the grip of Iran be any more resistant to their influence than other states in the region? It's not about them needing to be controlled for their own good, its just what would happen. The bolded though I'll grant you is true in my eyes, and will be for a generation or more now.
Would you say a state on the lines of the Camp David agreement be acceptable now? Because it wouldn't ever get any better for the forseeable future. Even if you could get them to the table and get rid of Bibi, Israel could barely offer that much, certainly not more.
Bon, ben je dormirai moins bête ce soir.Oui, tu racontes des conneries.
France hasn't changed, France has always done what suits its own agenda. Sometimes it follows other western countries and sometimes it doesn't but the policies are always linked to France interests.France is currently not chained to the US, Sarkozy tried but failed and Macron has consistently maintained a distance with the US and pushed for a more european-centric approach which has sometimes bothered other europeans.
Bon, ben je dormirai moins bête ce soir.
I absolutely agree on the bold part, but still feel that on the palestinian question, France had a voice of its own that could and should be listened to. I don't know what's Macron's long-term game there, maybe there isn't one as it's his last presidential term. Or how the internal dynamics are influencing Macron's international policy, even if I tried to catch up in the last weeks. France is still to my eyes the only european country that still could play a meaningful role there. Or maybe I should reconsider my romanticized Gaullism.
Anyway, thank you for replying and giving me the head wobble I maybe needed.
You're talking with the benefit of hindsight.
I highly doubt that the Jews who were forced to take their luggage and emigrate to God knows where particularly happy about it nor that any sane person in this day and age would approve of it. The ethnic cleansing of the Jews should never have happened in the first place, under any circumstance or any context. The irony is that it has been an immense cultural, economical, and intellectual loss for any country or regime that carried it out. It also certainly doesn't give the Israelis any right to inflict to another people the same suffering they were victims of for thousand of years.
The Bar Kokhba Revolt is quite the interesting and almost fitting comparison. However, Israel is not Rome, more of a Rome wannabe (in the region). There are a few countries in the world that still trump Israel in terms of military power and global influence, and could put them under pressure, if they choose to. Bar Kokhba also happened 2,000 years ago and things have somewhat changed in-between, especially after what happened in the 40's. You don't seriously believe that an ethnic cleansing of this magnitude could be carried out there without serious consequences. There's no western country that has remotely interest in that happening, if only for their own internal security and strategic perspective. The cycle of violence that would ensue and the loss of global influence would be absolutely catastrophic. There are other major actors closely watching how the situation there unfolds.
That's a dangerous and false shortcut I would avoid if I were you. Hamas has allied itself to Iran because Saudi Arabia chose to ditch them in 2017. For pragmatic reasons and under no illusions, given the fundamental difference of their respective vision of Islam. We also don't know how much Palestinians in Gaza support Hamas and as far as I know, neither the PA nor the West Bank are on board. Nor that they will ever be.
It's not, even less than in 2000. Now is the time to solve the problem once and for all. I don't mean in the next months, you have to let the wounds heal. What the Hamas achieved is for all actors in the region to go past the point of no-return and Israel has massively helped them with their predictable overreaction. The previous status quo isn't acceptable anymore, for anyone. Israel will never win by only using the military stick, it's suicidal and you know it. So you either think about the long-term and engage in true peace negociations, or you keep on riding the train wreck and watch the whole region burn for decades, in a way you've never seen before.
It's also truly the last time I engage with you about this ethnic cleansing topic. I will read your eventual reply but will not answer. Not because I want to have the last word, that's not my intent and I might be well wrong about my predictions, what do I know after all, but because I find it mind boggling to even have this kind of discussion about it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/11/05/white-house-resigned-israel-onslaught-gaza/
White House frustrated by Israel’s onslaught but sees few options
U.S. calls for a bombing pause are having little effect, and the shape of the post-war Mideast is starkly uncertain
U.S. efforts to get Israel to scale back its counterattack in response to the Oct. 7 killings by Hamas that left at least 1,400 Israelis dead have failed or fallen short. The Biden administration urged Israel against a ground invasion,privately asked it to consider proportionality in its attacks, advocated a higher priority on avoiding civilian deaths, and called for a humanitarian pause — only for Israeli officials to dismiss or reject all those suggestions.
U.S. officials had hoped there could be regular bombing pauses so that humanitarian and aid workers could safely operate in Gaza, according to a U.S. official familiar with the discussions. But securing such an arrangement seemed further out of reach after Blinken’s visit.
But from the outset, White House officials have been skeptical that an Israeli ground invasion of Gaza would achieve its stated aim of eliminating Hamas and feared that it would only lead to further escalation and destabilization. Now, White House advisers say, that is exactly what is happening.
“The reason they didn’t want the ground invasion and asked all the questions is they feared this is the consequence — the situation inside Gaza would only get worse for the people there, and that would lead to escalation,” said a person familiar with the administration’s thinking, speaking on the condition of anonymity to relay private conversations. “They’re just trying different ways of, ‘How do you mitigate a set of actions that are inevitable and won’t work and will fail?' ”
Critics of the Biden administration, including many Arab and Muslim Americans, argue that the United States has enormous financial leverage over Israel and could impose far more pressure if it chose.
Washington is Israel’s largest military backer, and the White House has asked Congress for an additional $14 billion in aid for Israel in the wake of the Hamas attacks. But administration officials and advisers say the levers the United States theoretically has over Israel, such as conditioning military aid on making the military campaign more targeted, are nonstarters, partly because they would be so politically unpopular in any administration and partly because, aides say, Biden himself has a personal attachment to Israel.
Others say that Israelis are so driven by anger and grief after the killings that even the threat of an aid pullback would have little effect. And Netanyahu, an already embattled leader whose political position is imperiled further by the attacks, may feel compelled to hit back in a hard and devastating way.
“Of course the United States has leverage — we provide Israel with $4 billion a year in grant aid,” said Bruce Riedel, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who worked on Middle East issues in the Clinton administration. “But every American administration, going back to the 1970s, has been loath to use that leverage because it would be highly unpopular.”
Riedel added: “I’m sure they say all the right things — ‘You have to abide by the rules of international law’ — but in practice, there’s more and more anger across the Arab and Muslim worlds at Israel and at us. It will come at a price.”
The Biden administration now finds itself with little influence over a key ally whose military campaign could affect everything from the global economy to America’s diplomatic relationships in the region.
“They’re watching a train wreck, and they can’t do anything about it, and the trains are speeding up,” said a person familiar with the administration’s thinking, who requested anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. “The train wreck is in Gaza, but the explosion is in the region. They know that even if they were to do something, which is to condition aid to Israel, it won’t actually stop the Israelis from what they’re doing.”
Hmmm didn't Ireland call for a ceasefire?
From the official Israel account...
Did you watch the clip in full? It's wild.Israel are embarrassing themselves with stuff like this.
That homer pic is so apt!
Did you watch the clip in full? It's wild.
I'd love the mods to explain why the promotion of ethnic cleansing is being tolerated.
If one accepts the logic (which is by now obviously just masked desire) that the Palestinians have to move to be safe then what next? Israel claims it's under constant threat from it's neighbors so presumably Israeli's have to move? Ukranian's will continue to be under threat from Russia so they should just give up the occupied territories and move?
Are there any verifiable studies on the Palestinians in regards to how many are secular/ left-wing/ islamist/ pro-West, etc? There's always this talk aboout 'the Palestinians' as if they're just this one, homogenous group of people who all have the same ideologies, convictions, worldviews etc. (Much easier to make that distinction in the Israeli society, imo.)
A really disgusting journalist/presenter, ITV should really be ashamed. Skip to the part of the interview.
So Jordan who already called their ambassador from Tel Aviv are now defying the Israeli imposed siege on Gaza in order to keep their field hospital from shutting down.
I'm no expert, but the range of beliefs and viewpoints held in both the West Bank and Gaza is pretty amazing given the confined nature of the societies. In Gaza you'll find much more support for Hamas than in the West Bank. This should, however, be noted with the caveat that Hamas run a brutal regime where dissidence and opposition is met with brute force in many cases. It's always hard to gauge the true feeling under regimes like theirs and - prior to the war - their popularity was in decline. It's perhaps one of the reasons why they chose to attack Israel when they did (Oct 7th).
But that said, Gaza is much more of a source for extremism than the West Bank where the Palestinian Authority still govern (by a thread and Jenin has become a pretty wild place for extremism in recent years). The prevalence of extremism is - in my opinion - one of the reasons you find the governments of Egypt and Jordan so reluctant to take in Palestinian refugees. Even when they do, they're holed up in camps and kept pretty separate from the rest of society. It's just all fecking depressing when you start to dive into the reality on the ground.
But generally, you're not going to find much secular, liberal, Western thought in the regions, particularly in the context of the current war. Understandably.
I'd love the mods to explain why the promotion of ethnic cleansing is being tolerated.
If one accepts the logic (which is by now obviously just masked desire) that the Palestinians have to move to be safe then what next? Israel claims it's under constant threat from it's neighbors so presumably Israeli's have to move? Ukranian's will continue to be under threat from Russia so they should just give up the occupied territories and move?
Explain to me why dead or destitute humans are preferable to displaced humans to you.\
These are not the only two options. Israel can idk, how about end its occupation and apartheid?
Great contribution. And apologies in advance, this is directed at several posters who have basically said the same thing. Ok. Tomorrow, Israel remove all IDF forces from Gaza, end the blockade, pull all settlers who are close back a mile or so. Done. Gaza stands alone. Ships may dock as they please. Gazans may pass out through Egypt (ha, Israel's fault of course Egyptians don't want that, but anyway), sail to whever they please.These are not the only two options. Israel can idk, how about end its occupation and apartheid?
So good work. Yes, Israel should just mind its own damn business, and everything would be peachy keen. Good plan, I for one am shocked its taken 80 years of bloodshed and failed negotiations to arrive at this point.
You’ve not been watching the deaths there since 10/7 then? Explain to me why dead or destitute humans are preferable to displaced humans to you. And yes, if Israel faced such overwhelming defeat I’d expect them to move. But then Jews are used to doing that.
You cannot in good faith say they will have better lives where they are. Because in anything other than a fantasy world they won’t. Oh and news flash for you from the real world. That’s exactly what Ukrainian civilians have been doing. They’ve moved out en masse. Any able to escape from conflict zones have done so.
ps. Stop projecting your desires on to me. I’ve long said a workable Palestinian state is the best solution. Displacement in war is common to protect life, it’s not some evil conspiracy.
It's not just a matter of what would result in the fewest deaths though is it? Ethnic cleansing is a little more complex than that. You're also massively removing agency from Israel here as if they're not even part of the equation.
Sorry but prefacing a claim or claiming it as the reality doesn't absolve subsequent statements.
You’ve not been watching the deaths there since 10/7 then? Explain to me why dead or destitute humans are preferable to displaced humans to you. And yes, if Israel faced such overwhelming defeat I’d expect them to move. But then Jews are used to doing that.
You cannot in good faith say they will have better lives where they are. Because in anything other than a fantasy world they won’t. Oh and news flash for you from the real world. That’s exactly what Ukrainian civilians have been doing. They’ve moved out en masse. Any able to escape from conflict zones have done so.
ps. Stop projecting your desires on to me. I’ve long said a workable Palestinian state is the best solution. Displacement in war is common to protect life, it’s not some evil conspiracy.
There are no good solutions here IMO.Great contribution. And apologies in advance, this is directed at several posters who have basically said the same thing. Ok. Tomorrow, Israel remove all IDF forces from Gaza, end the blockade, pull all settlers who are close back a mile or so. Done. Gaza stands alone. Ships may dock as they please. Gazans may pass out through Egypt (ha, Israel's fault of course Egyptians don't want that, but anyway), sail to whever they please.
Ok, so now what? Hamas is the governing body of Gaza. It has not held an election in 15 odd years. It is going nowhere. Last week, Gazan leadership affirmed that it would like to continue to do October 7ths until Israel no longer exists. And now, without blockades or security checkpoints, Iran (or any other power looking to destablise the world, see China, Russia) can send in all the weapons you can fit into Gaza. Hamas will continue to create plans to conduct mass murder on its neighbours, while not feeding, improving infrastructure or improving lives of its citizens. It certainly will not allow electiosn - why would it - it would lose.
Israel would basically be expected to just sit idly by, watching as its genocidal neighbours stock up on weapons, hoping I guess that the iron dome and IDF are able to use intelligence to limit the slaughter of its civilians. Which is obviously not a winning strategy politically, so no government is going to be able exist.
So good work. Yes, Israel should just mind its own damn business, and everything would be peachy keen. Good plan, I for one am shocked its taken 80 years of bloodshed and failed negotiations to arrive at this point.
Oh I know that's exactly what a few have explicitly said. If anything, October 7th was a justifiable catalyst towards a peaceful future. That such oppressed people had no choice but to brutally murder and torture a load of civilians, because really what other voice do they have? The world's not ignoring them now!I think the logic from most people here saying that is is, that this Hamas attack should be the trigger that convinces Israel it can no longer keep going the way it is, and it has no choice but to cede in Gaza as it's killing so many civilians and losing them allies, and therefore they will be forced to the negotiating table. Because the Hamas attack is only a result of their oppression, and if they stop oppressing Palestinians, everything will be dandy. Therefore this is the perfect opportunity for a two state solution to happen now.