Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Exclusive: Russia attempting to develop nuclear space weapon to destroy satellites with massive energy wave

Russia is trying to develop a nuclear space weapon that would destroy satellites by creating a massive energy wave when detonated, potentially crippling a vast swath of the commercial and government satellites that the world below depends on to talk on cell phones, pay bills, and surf the internet, according to three sources familiar with US intelligence about the weapon.
Click to expand...

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/16/...08130837&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
 
While there is and will be plenty of blame t throw at Mike Johnson for blocking the aid package to Ukraine, I say Joe Biden needs to sack Jake Sullivan in order to calm down angry voices from within his own party, calling out how slow military aid has been sent to Ukraine over the last 2 years overall.

It's time for someone like William McRaven to get the job.
 
Last edited:
RedDevilQuebecois said:
While there is and will be plenty of blame t throw at Mike Johnson for blocking the aid package to Ukraine, I say Joe Biden needs to sack Jake Sullivan in order to calm down angry voices from within his own party, calling out how slow military aid has been sent to Ukraine over the last 2 years overall.

It's time for someone like William McRaven to get the job.
Click to expand...

I'm not blaming dems directly, but perhaps it wasn't such a swell idea to back Gaetz little coup.

Yes, they got a few laughs, but in the end, they ended up with a speaker who won't work with them on anything.

This backfired in a big way, and sadly, for Ukraine even more.
 
When people said having numbers didn't help Russians in history earlier in this thread, I was surprised. I actually thought it was one of the main reasons (along with American equipment) to turn around against the Nazis.

Numbers do matter, especially if people are dumb enough to die for some dictator. It is very depressing for Ukraine that some leaders from the U.S. are abandoning them. It is getting to the point that it is getting a bit too late.
 
The United said:
When people said having numbers didn't help Russians in history earlier in this thread, I was surprised. I actually thought it was one of the main reasons (along with American equipment) to turn around against the Nazis.

Numbers do matter, especially if people are dumb enough to die for some dictator. It is very depressing for Ukraine that some leaders from the U.S. are abandoning them. It is getting to the point that it is getting a bit too late.
Click to expand...

Numbers in terms of men matters, but not so much as equipment.

Half a year ago, Ukraine actually had the advantage in a number of areas, artillery being one of them, but then, US couldn't be bothered supporting them anymore, and Europe couldn't be bothered to up production either, so now we see the consequences.

Putin was banking on the west growing bored, and looks like he will be right.

If NATO don't really care about Ukraine, the very least they could do would be to honest with Ukraine about it, instead of these "we will never abandon you"-nonsense statements.
 
Morty_ said:
Numbers in terms of men matters, but not so much as equipment.

Half a year ago, Ukraine actually had the advantage in a number of areas, artillery being one of them, but then, US couldn't be bothered supporting them anymore, and Europe couldn't be bothered to up production either, so now we see the consequences.

Putin was banking on the west growing bored, and looks like he will be right.

If NATO don't really care about Ukraine, the very least they could do would be to honest with Ukraine about it, instead of these "we will never abandon you"-nonsense statements.
Click to expand...
Pretty much agree with the last paragraph, I'm getting to the 'give it up, what's the point'? Stage myself. Go all in or get all out, see what happens
 
Is there a possibility Russia will go further into Ukraine and occupy more territory again, now that Ukraine is short on ammo and man power or the stalemate is the best and most realistic cause of events?
 
Real Name said:
Is there a possibility Russia will go further into Ukraine and occupy more territory again, now that Ukraine is short on ammo and man power or the stalemate is the best and most realistic cause of events?
Click to expand...

It's unlikely to be more than the odd town here and there, they threw everything at Avdiivka to get it. The good thing is that the European ammo production supposedly is slowly ramping up, even if not as fast as is needed, so even without US aid, the situation should get a bit less dire as we go. What happens with Ukrainian mobilisation is also important I think. If they can hold on until they get a more steady supply of ammo and then mobilise more men, they should be in a much better position than right now.
 
Sounds like they moved a Patriot battery near the front there.
 
Russian helicopter pilot who defected to Ukraine has apparently been found dead in Spain.

 
onemanarmy said:


Crazy if true.
Click to expand...

If we were to believe them, they shot down the whole VVS, sank the Russian navy and destroyed their whole army.

I don't trust Ukrainian or Russian sources one bit. Two sides of the same coin that vastly exaggerate the enemy's losses and minimize their own, Pravda style.

Look at the front, at territorial gains and losses. Towns conquered or fallen and their strategic importance. Anything else is just a vertical slice that tells nothing about the whole story.
 
Last edited:
That_Bloke said:
If we were to believe them, they shot down the whole VVS, sank the Russian navy and destroyed their whole army.

I don't trust Ukrainian or Russian sources one bit. Two sides of the same coin that vastly exaggerate the enemy's losses and minimize their own, Pravda style.

Look at the front, at territorial gains and losses. Towns conquered or fallen and their strategic importance. Anything else is just a vertical slice that tells nothing about the whole story.
Click to expand...
First paragraph seems disingenous to me.

There have been moments where Ukraine's high profile claims haven't been corroborated by Western sources. But to my knowledge it's not a systemic thing. To the contrary, Russian milbloggers routinely confirm airforce losses and Ukraine's sea drone footage of recent attacks have shown Russian ships to be sinking. And we've seen the aftermath of Russian ships who got hit by Ukraine's airforce.

The daily reported losses figures of Russian equipment and men does seem highly optimistic to me and I would take them with a grain of salt. But the high profile attacks do get plenty of confirmation.

The notion that Ukraine has pretended that they have destroyed all of Russia's military doesn't really fly.
 
Last edited:
VorZakone said:
First paragraph seems disingenous to me.

There have been moments where Ukraine's high profile claims haven't been corroborated by Western sources. But to my knowledge it's not a systemic thing. To the contrary, Russian milbloggers routinely confirm airforce losses and Ukraine's sea drone footage of recent attacks have shown Russian ships to be sinking. And we've seen the aftermath of Russian ships who got hit by Ukraine's airforce.

The daily reported losses figures of Russian equipment and men does seem highly optimistic to me and I would take them with a grain of salt. But the high profile attacks do get plenty of confirmation.

The notion that Ukraine has pretended that they have destroyed all of Russia's military doesn't really fly.
Click to expand...

It was a (not so obvious) hyperbole. There's absolutely no denying that Russia took heavy losses and will continue to do so. Despite the lack of current help, Ukraine isn't some backward country that can't defend itself, unlike the usual targets the US and the West got accustomed to bomb back to the stone age in the past 75 years.

My point is that unless there's significant towns or regions changing hands, the glorious stories of planes, ships, or tanks being busted have little meaning.

Wait and watch for the big results.
 
Last edited:
That_Bloke said:
It was a (not so obvious) hyperbole. There's absolutely no denying that Russia took heavy losses and will continue to do so. Despite the lack of current help, Ukraine isn't some backward country that can't defend itself, unlike the usual targets the US and the West got accustomed to bomb back to the stone age in the past 75 years.

My point is that unless there's significant towns or regions changing hands, the glorious stories of planes, ships, or tanks being busted have little meaning.

Wait and watch for the big results.
Click to expand...

They only have little meaning if you think that an invasion force (or a defending force for that matter) can continue taking losses indefinitely. Clearly they can't, this is simply a question of who can outlast the other. Right now it looks to be Russia but things could change with the right support. A town lost or gained has to also be looked at in the context of what it cost in terms of lives, money, time and equipment.
 
That_Bloke said:
It was a (not so obvious) hyperbole. There's absolutely no denying that Russia took heavy losses and will continue to do so. Despite the lack of current help, Ukraine isn't some backward country that can't defend itself, unlike the usual targets the US and the West got accustomed to bomb back to the stone age in the past 75 years.

My point is that unless there's significant towns or regions changing hands, the glorious stories of planes, ships, or tanks being busted have little meaning.

Wait and watch for the big results.
Click to expand...
Not when planes costs millions of dollars.
 
That_Bloke said:
It was a (not so obvious) hyperbole. There's absolutely no denying that Russia took heavy losses and will continue to do so. Despite the lack of current help, Ukraine isn't some backward country that can't defend itself, unlike the usual targets the US and the West got accustomed to bomb back to the stone age in the past 75 years.

My point is that unless there's significant towns or regions changing hands, the glorious stories of planes, ships, or tanks being busted have little meaning.

Wait and watch for the big results.
Click to expand...

I think its fairly well established now that the this war doesn't end from the changing hands of towns or regions. It ends through the attrition of Russian forces until the cost is too high. Lost planes, ships, tanks and men mean everything.

Also, the daily figures they report may look exaggerated in personnel, but the equipment losses tie in to the visually confirmed losses that have been catalogued. Potentially even light, depending on what level of losses that don't get photographed you assume. Ukraine has made some mistakes in its reporting at times sure, but I don't think there's much case to suggest they openly lie/exaggerate in general. Take a look at the civilian casualties they report, 10k... We know in Mariupol the number is potentially many times that from the first few weeks alone, but they report confirmed only.

I don't blame anyone for assuming Ukraine would lie and exaggerate, as that's just the norm right? It's what we'd do? I think they are a lot more by the book than they get credit for however.
 
Last edited:
TwoSheds said:
They only have little meaning if you think that an invasion force (or a defending force for that matter) can continue taking losses indefinitely. Clearly they can't, this is simply a question of who can outlast the other. Right now it looks to be Russia but things could change with the right support. A town lost or gained has to also be looked at in the context of what it cost in terms of lives, money, time and equipment.
Click to expand...
Attrition is definitely not on Ukraine's side.

This is one conflict where I'm having the hardest time of my life getting a remotely accurate idea on the military situation because of the incredible amount of propaganda and disinformation from both sides.

We've been told for months that Russia was done. Its economy is on its knees, its army is shit and can't fight for shit, its equipment is shit, its generals are shit. It lost about 52,000,000 soldiers, 137,000 planes and 250,000 tanks but at the same time is somehow able to take on NATO and invade Western Europe.

On the other side Ukraine is finished. It's a failed, corrupt country full of Nazis, with no remaining army to speak of, sending women and old people to the front. It needs to be denazified and brought back to the herd, hence the highly successful, ongoing special operations. Then everything will be just fine.

I don't trust either side, certainly not tweets and prefer to wait a few months after each glorious announcement to see what's what.
 
Last edited:
That_Bloke said:
Attrition is definitely not on Ukraine's side.
Click to expand...

I disagree, for the simple fact Ukraine will never stop fighting no matter what support they are or are not getting, they can't, they don't have a choice. Similarly, NATO doesn't really have a choice to support Ukraine, there's no real debate to that decision, just short term self-serving political nonsense from certain people that unfortunately have influence over decisions within the group.

For Russia the whole thing is fairly pointless to begin with so the costs weigh heavier against the benefits of carrying on. Only the Russian side has a breaking point, it's just that it may be 5 years or so away.
 
The officials declined to say whether Russia had responded to the initial reachout, but did say that since the program became public knowledge last week Russia has not shown any willingness to engage on the issue.
Click to expand...

 
VorZakone said:
Click to expand...

Criminal mastermind nutcase doing criminal mastermind nutcase things. More at 5.

Speaking of this creature - has anyone ever seen a solid writeup on the likely outcome of what were to happen if Putin finally descends into hell? I know he has been gradually putting family members in positions of power, but surely a massive power vacuum is likely to appear regardless?
 
Redplane said:
Criminal mastermind nutcase doing criminal mastermind nutcase things. More at 5.

Speaking of this creature - has anyone ever seen a solid writeup on the likely outcome of what were to happen if Putin finally descends into hell? I know he has been gradually putting family members in positions of power, but surely a massive power vacuum is likely to appear regardless?
Click to expand...

There will be a power vacuum for some time, but, to paraphrase Ralf Rangnick, that country is in dire need of an open heart surgery regardless. If Russia wants to make the full transition into a democracy, there will be a need for very hard work from pro-democracy activist groups and lots of protests on the scale of what happened in South Korea in the decade following Park Chung-hee's assasination.
 
Hard to believe it, but it as been 10 years today since this pivotal moment from the Maidan Revolution. Tomorrow will be the 10th anniversary of the day when Yanukovich fled.

 
Not good.

Hundreds of Ukrainian troops may have been captured by advancing Russian units or disappeared during Ukraine’s chaotic retreat from the eastern city of Avdiivka, according to senior Western officials and soldiers fighting for Ukraine, a devastating loss that could deal a blow to already weakening morale.
Click to expand...

 
VorZakone said:
First paragraph seems disingenous to me.

There have been moments where Ukraine's high profile claims haven't been corroborated by Western sources. But to my knowledge it's not a systemic thing. To the contrary, Russian milbloggers routinely confirm airforce losses and Ukraine's sea drone footage of recent attacks have shown Russian ships to be sinking. And we've seen the aftermath of Russian ships who got hit by Ukraine's airforce.

The daily reported losses figures of Russian equipment and men does seem highly optimistic to me and I would take them with a grain of salt. But the high profile attacks do get plenty of confirmation.

The notion that Ukraine has pretended that they have destroyed all of Russia's military doesn't really fly.
Click to expand...

I see what you did there.
 
VorZakone said:
Not good.



Click to expand...


My wife's cousin and his comrades are hiding/stuck inside a tunnel within the city. My wife and family did an airtime call with him two days ago to keep his spirits up.

It was all banter and we were careful not to talk any war stuff in case it could compromise his position.

He said there's high chance he won't make it out alive but he showed absolutely zero signs of fear. Brave lad - 45 year old with no prior military experience before this war.

We have had no communication since. We are praying he makes it out alive.
 
Last edited:
Kaush949 said:
My wife's cousin and his comrades are hiding/stuck inside a tunnel within the city. My wife and family did a airtime call with him two days ago to keep his spirits up.

It was all banter and we were careful not to talk any war stuff in case it could compromise his position.

He said there's high chance he won't make it out alive but he showed absolutely zero signs of fear. Brave lad - 45 year old with no prior military experience before this war.

We have had no communication since. We are praying he makes it out alive.
Click to expand...
That's awful to hear. I hope that he'll get out unharmed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.