We’ve already triggered the one year extension so he is contracted to the club until 25/26 season as things stand right now.This presupposes that Greenwood will sign a new contract, unless we offer some pretty serious financial inducement I am not sure what reason he would have, he knows he is never coming back to play here, as a free agent he has control over where he goes and will gain financially
He has been compared to Erik ten Hag, with both managers having a focus on compact, defensive structures. They share the same football vision, which they learned while in the youth department of FC Twente. The two also share a training principle that requires all players to be involved in both attacking and defensive play.
From Wiki:
Mostly of skint clubs who wants to lowball us.
Cheap clubs but enough of them that we should be able to get an okay fee and a good sell on clause. Last summer the interest was minimal at best, so this is a big improvement.Anyone willing to pay a decent fee though? We are not a charitable institution. Are we?
Ffs, indeed.Can we please keep the EtH shit talking out of the transfer thread? Ffs.
“Total Sponsorship”fully expect us to announce a new partnership with a clog manufacturer, and to install windmills on top of OT at this rate.
Maybe we'll sell space cakes in the refreshment stands, and have a red light district out the back of the bogs
Stroopwafels and Heinekenfully expect us to announce a new partnership with a clog manufacturer, and to install windmills on top of OT at this rate.
Maybe we'll sell space cakes in the refreshment stands, and have a red light district out the back of the bogs
French Fries with Fritessaus and FrikandellenStroopwafels and Heineken![]()
Just some information for you , I wouldn’t be reading into much information on 95% of the tweets posted on here until deadline. Most of them are click bait.So, he scores one goal against Germany & now he's the best thing since sliced bread in INEOS eyes, good grief.![]()
It’s your opinion and you’re entitled to it but it’s complete BS. He’s never coming back toConsidering our tiny transfer budget and how little we are being offered for him I wouldn't be surprised if INEOS are trying to orchestrate his return.
At the very least, he will return and train with United in the pre-season and they will judge the mood then. If they do end up selling him, they need to try to suggest to prospective buyers that they do have an option to keep him otherwise all we will get is lowball offers.
And fill the ditch around the OT pitch with water so we have canals. Would also make someone falling much more entertaining.French Fries with Fritessaus and Frikandellen![]()
Tier 2:
None would have happened yet? They can't actually be registered until July 1st, so they're warning them to think about it before they plan to register it with the league.Good, but dont think anything will come of it on the transfers that have happened already might make clubs think twice about doing it from now.
Not true, the PL's registration period started in mid June. For most other European leagues, registration doesn't open until July 1.None would have happened yet? They can't actually be registered until July 1st, so they're warning them to think about it before they plan to register it with the league.
I stand corrected. I still don't think any of these PSR transfers have been made official, have they?Not true, the PL's registration period started in mid June. For most other European leagues, registration doesn't open until July 1.
None would have happened yet? They can't actually be registered until July 1st, so they're warning them to think about it before they plan to register it with the league.
Don't think so. Would be hilarious if they didn't make it over the finish line in time, and the clubs were all stuck with players they didn't want, without any 2023-24 PSR benefit.I stand corrected. I still don't think any of these PSR transfers have been made official, have they?
It's perfectly possible to sell a player while we cover parts of his wages - not ideal for us but better than a loan.
Would serve them right!Don't think so. Would be hilarious if they didn't make it over the finish line in time, and the clubs were all stuck with players they didn't want, without any 2023-24 PSR benefit.
Just a thought about Varane.
He's being linked to clubs like newly promoted Como. My guess is he will only be getting a fraction of the wages he got at United.
Could we not have just offered him say £100k a week and he wouldnt have had to uproot his family and potentially miss out on more trophies for the same pay abroad?
Yes he's injury prone, but the last few games he had at United were fantastic and if we can get half a season out of him it would be worth keeping for another year instead of blowing £40m to replace him + still needing another CB.
Whilst I hate Chelsea, I also think fair play to them. If only we had the foresight to play within the rules.Chelsea always seem to be one step ahead of the game when it comes to transfer rules.
In the Roman era they shoveled in a shit tonne of cash before FFP.
When they got the transfer ban/ embargo they managed to get Kovacic in somehow.
They managed to get a fair chunk of this current squad on ridiculous 8 year amortised contracts to bypass FFP.
The sale of Maatsen and the Villa transfer the other way is dodgy af, yet they’ve got it over the line before this new transfer rule.