is it only me that has now 'switched off' to what happens there? They will still be maiming each other in another 20 years and we'll still all be talking about it then. They have all the resources, yet make their choice to continue killing each other. The likes of Sudan, Somalia etc, 3rd world countries, little resources, millions of innocents murdered or starving. Thats who deserves the front pages of our media. Not these fecking loons.
is it only me that has now 'switched off' to what happens there? They will still be maiming each other in another 20 years and we'll still all be talking about it then. They have all the resources, yet make their choice to continue killing each other. The likes of Sudan, Somalia etc, 3rd world countries, little resources, millions of innocents murdered or starving. Thats who deserves the front pages of our media. Not these fecking loons.
is it only me that has now 'switched off' to what happens there? They will still be maiming each other in another 20 years and we'll still all be talking about it then. They have all the resources, yet make their choice to continue killing each other. The likes of Sudan, Somalia etc, 3rd world countries, little resources, millions of innocents murdered or starving. Thats who deserves the front pages of our media. Not these fecking loons.
Dateline: January 3rd 1944
Fury continues to mount worldwide about the senseless loss of civilian life in Germany caused by England's callous bombing of German cities including Berlin, Hamburg and Dresden.
As of today many innocent German women and children have died in these utterly brutal bombing missions. And now there are ground offensives starting on mainland Europe.
The English have claimed that they are merely retaliating against the V-1 flying bombs being launched indiscriminately by Nazis at their civilian population in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Coventry and other cities. The English point out that their enemy is sworn to its utter destruction and has used the missiles and flying bombs against its civilians without any regard to English loss of life. Moreover it makes the case that their own bombing missions are specifically directed to military targets that the German army has intentionally planted in the heart of civilian populations to try and deter English counter-attacks.
These points may of course be true - but they are utterly besides the point.
Of course England has a right to exist. Of course England has a right to defend itself. But it should ensure that its responses are PROPORTIONATE.
Since many more Germans are dying than English - the English should either tone down the success and accuracy of their bombing - or allow the Germans to catch up on the death count.
To be honest - if more English women and children were dying - we wouldn't feel quite so bad about the number of Germans dying. But it's just so UNFAIR that more Germans are dying...
Perhaps some English people could arrange to kill themselves to match the number of Germans dying as a result of the English retaliation bombing? It would be so considerate - and it might help England's critics feel less miserable about the number of Nazis dying. Something that is causing them so much concern.
It would also put paid to that wretched proportionality argument.
Alternatively, perhaps the English could arrange to be less effective in their bombing? Or only bomb military targets that are nowhere near civilians - even though the vast majority of the V-1 rockets are intentionally being launched from the heart of civilian population centers.
Now the English will argue that the Germans have INTENTIONALLY positioned all their launch pads for the V-1 rockets in the middle of civilian populations to inhibit the English from bombing those launch sites. Well - tough noogies to the Brits! Sorry - but if the Germans are smarter or more skillful at cynically using their civilians as human shields than you - tough luck!
You can't have it both ways. If you truly wish to save your nation from being annihilated by Nazi missiles you'd better stop looking to win a popularity contest. The Nazis are waging this war to win and to utterly destroy England. If all you Brits care about is popularity - then you may as well resign yourself to speaking German...
It's about time that little nations who wish to defend themselves wised up to their responsibilities.
Otherwise the same stupid complaints will be made at some point in the 21st Century when some little nation finds itself under constant attack from rockets fired at its civilian population by a terrorizing enemy that has sworn to destroy it....
The reason why westerners such as myself are outraged at this particular crisis, is because our nations are not only turning a blind eye, but also backing the Israeli-committed atrocities. I understand that the situation in the likes of Sudan, Somalia the Congo etc is extremely desperate, and I feel for those people donating whatever clothes or money I can spare, but this is due to internal problems.
But RedKaos, what is it exactly that you want from the British government? In practical terms?
1) What the feck does that have to do with anything?
2) You're NOT the small nation. I repeat, you have the FULL backing of the United States regardless of what you do, the EU presidency as well as most of the western world. Even the Egyptians and Turks near your region hold a diplomatic understanding with you. The rest of the nations (possibly with the exception of Iran and Syria) are puppet dictators or corrupt monarchs which will gladly kiss western ass for their own means, and trust me all of them are too cowardly to bother you. If anything, this silly article would apply to the defenceless Palestinians who have to use their home-made devices to fight the 4th strongest military complex in the world.
On a bigger scale: to be independent from the United States foreign policy.
In this particular issue: To officially condemn Israel's offensive,
to pressurise it to open it borders for an intake of much needed food and medicine for the Gaza civilians,
and push it towards a two-state solution. It was the British who essentially established the State of Israel, they are hence burdened with responsibility regarding the region.
On a bigger scale: to be independent from the United States foreign policy.
In this particular issue: To officially condemn Israel's offensive, to pressurise it to open it borders for an intake of much needed food and medicine for the Gaza civilians, and push it towards a two-state solution. It was the British who essentially established the State of Israel, they are hence burdened with responsibility regarding the region.
On a bigger scale: to be independent from the United States foreign policy.
In this particular issue: To officially condemn Israel's offensive, to pressurise it to open it borders for an intake of much needed food and medicine for the Gaza civilians, and push it towards a two-state solution. It was the British who essentially established the State of Israel, they are hence burdened with responsibility regarding the region.
This is a sad truth.is it only me that has now 'switched off' to what happens there? They will still be maiming each other in another 20 years and we'll still all be talking about it then. They have all the resources, yet make their choice to continue killing each other. The likes of Sudan, Somalia etc, 3rd world countries, little resources, millions of innocents murdered or starving. Thats who deserves the front pages of our media. Not these fecking loons.
Im steering clear of this thread. Everyone clearly has their own views including I, and wont budge and thats fair enough so theres no point putting through arguments. Lets just hope that there'll eventually be a solution to this mess, and less suffering endured by both Israelis and Palestinians. God Bless.
On a bigger scale: to be independent from the United States foreign policy.
In this particular issue: To officially condemn Israel's offensive, to pressurise it to open it borders for an intake of much needed food and medicine for the Gaza civilians, and push it towards a two-state solution.
It was the British who essentially established the State of Israel, they are hence burdened with responsibility regarding the region.
Latest AP report:
Tuesday (The second day of reports of women & children being slaughtered)
GAZA CITY, Gaza – An Israeli bombardment hit outside a U.N. school where hundreds of Palestinians had sought refuge on Tuesday, and Palestinian medics said at least 34 people died — many of them children — as international outrage grew over civilian deaths.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090106/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians
It is now appropriate to use the term 'genocide'. The international community needs to halt all funding or any form of financial support to Israel.
Latest AP report:
It is now appropriate to use the term 'genocide'. The international community needs to halt all funding or any form of financial support to Israel.
Genocide isn't killing children.
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.
of course people care, i for one would have been out raged but nothing came of it despite how bad an attack it was whereas kids are actually dying in Israeli air strikes
No one said its OK are you blind or ignorant I said I would have been outraged and clearly stated that i thought it was bad attack.
Israel's retaliation strike seem to be badly co-ordinated as Israel too seem to target citizens with an alarmingly frequent rate.
People are allowed to formulate their own ideas and you do not know how people come to their conclusions on the situation and i do sympathise with you for having to live through the situation my sister is a doctor and has worked on both sides so in order to bring an informed opinion to the table I have my own ideas as well as information from her .
No one said its OK are you blind or ignorant I said I would have been outraged and clearly stated that i thought it was bad attack.
Israel's retaliation strike seem to be badly co-ordinated as Israel too seem to target citizens with an alarmingly frequent rate.
Latest AP report:
Tuesday (The second day of reports of women & children being slaughtered)
GAZA CITY, Gaza – An Israeli bombardment hit outside a U.N. school where hundreds of Palestinians had sought refuge on Tuesday, and Palestinian medics said at least 34 people died — many of them children — as international outrage grew over civilian deaths.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090106/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_israel_palestinians
It is now appropriate to use the term 'genocide'. The international community needs to halt all funding or any form of financial support to Israel.
Wikipedia definition... (you chose which of the several aspects of this one sentence apply.)
Genocide is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group.
Well, bad as it might sound, if we wanted to do that, there would have been far from than a few hundred dead. So it's not genocide.
By the way, a Hamas rocket landed in a Kindergarten in Ashdod yesterday. Luckily it was empty, and no one was hurt. Of course, nobody gives a f*ck about that.
Its not genocide by any measure, especially when the word "systematic" comes into play considering an IDF tank shell killed 4 Israeli soldiers. Hardly systematic. A tank shell dropping outside a school is a tragedy but it constitutes not a genocide.
This sort of inflammatory rhetoric doesn't help anyone win arguments. Just entrenches both sides.
By the sound of the Israeli spokesman Mark Regev, I don't believe a fecking word from the Israeli govt.
One might by correct in suspecting that the IDF had set off a bomb in an empty school, to make it appear that Hamas had bombed it, thus offsetting the horrendous pulicity Israel is getting for killing so many civilians.
Its not genocide by any measure, especially when the word "systematic" comes into play considering an IDF tank shell killed 4 Israeli soldiers. Hardly systematic. A tank shell dropping outside a school is a tragedy but it constitutes not a genocide.
This sort of inflammatory rhetoric doesn't help anyone win arguments. Just entrenches both sides.
Update -
Palestinian sources put the death toll for today at 50, there was not a breakdown on the proportion of Hamas or other such fighters and civilians however.
Also Hamas managed to launch 30 rockets into Israel during the day, no word of any fatalities as far as i am aware.
One bit of anecdotal information for you. A Sky News correspondent said earlier that a member of the IDF was temporarily at least, seized when battling fighters in a tunnel under a house in Gaza City. He did manage to free himself and escape back to Israeli lines [perhaps in part due to the confined spaces that made his initial capture possible].
Aid agencies are reporting that 1,000s of people are reported to have fled their homes as the violence draws closer. Though to what degree of safety and conditions they now live in, we can but guess.
That's a load of shit!!!
Someone needs to call a spade a spade for this blood-bath to stop. I mean - Holy feck!! - the IDF are butching children.
When I heard that 20 children were killed, yesterday... I took pause and thought... that would be like my daughter's entire class. Then, today's incident only multiplies that thought by several times what it was yesterday.
I find it disgraceful, this whole thing.
Its disappointing but still predictable to see Israeli "Defence" spokespersons including a woman major (whose name I missed) blame the victims.
Asked on ITN why Israel was attacking civilians in a school, she blamed Hamas and actually said to address the question to Hammas leaders.
Two leaders of Hammas were" in the school" therefore its a legitimate target.
Any civilian deaths are Hammas fault.
Likewise in her view Hammas leaders were walking around Gaza carrying children.
This I am afraid is the language and thinking of the worst kind of terrorist.
How dare Israelis assumea moral high ground.
How dare they presume to think we (the West) are allies in this terrorism.
Let me again emphasise to the apologists on BOTH sides that I find them equally disgusting.