World Cup 2018 & 2022 bids

2022 ballot:
First round
Qatar 11
South Korea 4
Japan 3
U.S. 3
Australia 1 (eliminated)

Second round
Qatar 10
South Korea 5
U.S. 5
Japan 2 (eliminated)

Third round
Qatar 11
U.S. 6
South Korea 5 (eliminated)

Fourth round
Qatar 14
U.S. 8

How the hell did Australia only get one vote? That is nigh on the equal of England in terms of injustice but in their case it being the bidding. A nation of their sporting heritage and what they could offer as a legacy too, an insult.
 
Don't think it was Russian delegates so much as Jack Warner and the CONCACAF bloc. I think in the first round, England and Japan voted for England, while Belgium and the CONCACAF trio voted for Holland/Belgium. In round two, after being eliminated, England voted for Holland/Belgium, and CONCACAF voted for Russia.

Do we ever get to find out? Or do we just get the numbers we've got?
 
First of all....lets all laugh at:

images


Since winning the election, this is the first time he's really stepped up and shown his face and got behind something infront of the whole public...he thought he'd be in the papers getting all the positive press - and we don't get it.

Congratulations to Russia and Qatar.

And he does not even like football.
 
But that is a product of the bidding system. If they went along Mockney's lines then appropriate countries would be in the running.

I think a bit more guidance either way would help. If FIFA said from the start "it doesn't matter how good your bid is, we want to give it to a new country this time" then Spain and England could save a lot of time and money...

Exactly, based on this logic and the fact that Europe & Asia are ruled out for 2026, I'm expecting that to go to Cuba.
 
Originally Posted by Tibs
First of all....lets all laugh at:



Since winning the election, this is the first time he's really stepped up and shown his face and got behind something infront of the whole public...he thought he'd be in the papers getting all the positive press - and we don't get it.

Congratulations to Russia and Qatar.


And he does not even like football.

And was on record saying it was pointless and corrupt.
 
Mean average, not median average.

The same sort of generalisations could be made about any other country, 20 families in Qatar is equivalent to 4400 families in the USA, that's the massive wealth of Rockefeller family, the Morgan family, the Ford family, the Vanderbilt family etc. before you even make a dent in this. Or the UK's 440 families e.g. Mital, Abramovich, Grosvenor, Bertarelli etc. Or the Ireland's top 44 e.g. Weston, O'Reily, Dorrance, Desmond, Quinn, Ryan etc.

You forget that these 20 families (approx 400 people assuming the 8 per family ratio holds up) that "have 90% of the wealth" employ may be 50-60% of the population. In terms of Qatar's median income is $46000 compare that to Japan's $3800. If the 20 Qatari families horded its wealth to itself then this figure would be near third world proportions.

The average engineer in Qatar earns four times as much as his UK equivalent, as does the average accountant, the average doctor or dentist three times more. So the middle class in Qatar earns higher. What we in Europe would term "working class" gets it quite good too, the average bricklayer in Qatar probably earns 5-10 times as much as their UK equivalent.

Add this to the fact that the unemployment rate is a miserly 0.5%, i.e. 7000 people, compared to the UK's (7.7%, 5 million)

The vast majority of Qataris are quite well off, (with at least 7000 not so), the health service there is a non-profit entity and there is low poverty.

Of course it's not the full picture, but obviously Qatar's lumpenproletariat hasn't made any sort of major dent on its figures in comparison to any Western nation, it's still obviously not great for the 7000 people unemployed, any unregistered exploited migrant workers, those on miserly wages and those on the lower ends of the pay structure and indeed the effects of the much higher cost of living, are also not revealed by these figures.
 
I dont see why not but you are right there is a risk of them not fulfilling their promises - they have got the cash do it though.


Qatar 2022 CEO Hassan Abdulla Al Thawadi, said the new stadia were designed "with legacy front of mind and, with their modular design, can be reduced in size after the World Cup to fit local football and community requirements and, in some cases, transported abroad for permanent use".​

Qatar Stadiums for 2022 FIFA World Cup, AS&P - Albert Speer & Partner GmbH, world architecture news, architecture jobs

to be honest, it stinks like the South African world cup. FIFA paid millions in kickbacks and built local stadium, local club grounds etc for them, just so that they could have the WC there. Daresay this is as corrupt
 
And he does not even like football.

In fairness, if he didn't participate heavily in the bid, he would have been accused of not caring and of being detached from the public.
 
FIFA is a lot different than any business. If you acted like they did, you wouldn't have any bidders. It's almost like a criminal enterprise in that their MO is manipulate, dominate and control, which is a fairly succinct description of the World CUp bid process if I do say so myself.

I think you are agreeing then with feck FIFA off from an England perspective, what's the point, why bother if they are a law unto themselves. The problem is, they don't start their bidding process, with clarity on their criteria. What's the point with the bid book and the technical critera? I would expect my suppliers to walk away if I iussed an RFP and then ignired the reward criteria. It's clear that there is no point in England bidding for future tournaments.
 
I'm going to contend that FIFA are only slightly responsible to the football associations which the nations belong to...and only just at that.

The reason I say this is, FIFA suspends international football associations from competitions for many reasons...for example, Political involvement by the government.

So if it can 'meddle' into the affairs of a member nation, surely that nation is a stakeholder in the overall makeup of FIFA, and has a right to except accountability from FIFA(not just for this vote, I mean even the mundane day to day stuff)
 
I think you slightly misunderstood. England performed incredibly well on the criteria set out for the bid. This criteria is supposedly used to count towards the validity of the bid and should therefore be worthy of gaining some votes.

If Fifa ignore their own criteria then what's the point of the bidding process?

Guess to bide time to negotiate the bribes.
 
Great post Mockney.

2nded.

Sammsky is missing the point with a lot of this - it's not solely because england didnt get it that some people are angered by fifa. It's that the tournament is now given to whoever is least best equipped to put it on so FIFA can spread the game, as it were.

If they are intent on doing that then why let countries like england and spain bid? It's a huge waste of time. Oh, except for the factFIFA loves being pampered and arse licked by politicians, royals and celebrities so they encourage the elaborate process.

If you allow countries to bid then the winner should be whoever makes the best bid and in this case englands bid was the sole bid that got 100% rating for its technical aspects in the race for 2018. If russia wants the world cup then they should put that in place before trying to get it!
 
Que Sera Sera
Whatever will be will be
We're going to Sports City in Doha
Que Sera Sera
 
First of all....lets all laugh at:

images


Since winning the election, this is the first time he's really stepped up and shown his face and got behind something infront of the whole public...he thought he'd be in the papers getting all the positive press - and we don't get it.

Congratulations to Russia and Qatar.

I'm not sure what your point is, dammed if he did support, and dammed if he didn't.
 
I find it hilarious how Robbie Earle sold on a few of the tickets he was given by ITV for this summer's world cup and got fired immediately, but when Jack Warner makes $1million out of selling on 2006 world cup tickets he was fined and kept his job.

Says it all about FIFA.
 
Sky going on about how great the presentation was today. I thought it was horribly cringe worthy and ultra-cheesy. William and Cameron made me feel ill and Beckham's stuff about his grandfather was rotten.

If I was on the panel and was undecided todays presentation would have steered me against England
 
First of all....lets all laugh at:

images


Since winning the election, this is the first time he's really stepped up and shown his face and got behind something infront of the whole public...he thought he'd be in the papers getting all the positive press - and we don't get it.

Congratulations to Russia and Qatar.

So you missed the emergency budget and comprehensive spending review then.
 
I was hoping England would get 2018 and the States would get 2022 so I could go to both of them. fecking FIFA, England most definitely needed to get it without a shadow of a doubt.
 
Oh they'll be fantastic. Without a doubt. They'll throw so much money at it it'll be like Disneyland meets Vegas meets Dubai with football..and I'll more than likely go (Ifs permitting) but that isn't the point..

Here's the point (IMO)..

Firstly the notion that FIFA is a hugely corrupt and agenda driven organisation (but that's really a given) but mainly the overbearing feeling that the actual base aspects of football and World Cups (the quality of football, the teams actually in it, the fans actually going, the players actually playing etc) are no longer taken into consideration when deciding the who hosts the football World Cup. Which is silly. All those saying "yeah but it's nice they're given a chance' probably aren't fecking going..and certainly aren't fecking playing in it. The World Cup isn't a charity drive, it's a football tournament but Blatter (at face value at least) seems to be trying deliberately to give it to countries who don't seem suitable as a sort of incentive to get football really big there...

And I've got no problem with that philosophy. In essence it's great and I love the fact the WC went to Africa last time, and I think it should definitely go to countries who wouldn't normally see top class football...but in moderation. Not every year. It's disregarding the core of football and the core of the fanbases to be political. And that's without even touching on the idea that a country shouldn't use the WC as an incentive to clean up/modernise their act once they've got it. They should do that AS an incentive to get the WC.

Lets look at the last 4 decided hosts and see what their merits have been..

South Africa - First WC in Africa. Little WC history in the country itself (comparatively) but a deserving one for the continent as a whole. Practically it didn't initially meet criteria though. Little infrastrucure to begin with and concerns over safety, weather, altitude, travel etc. It ended up not being a great WC but it was worthy and in the end a success for the country itself.

Brazil - Deserving on historical merit. Easily. Same concerns over safety, travel etc though, but because of it's long and rich history with football deserves its chance.

Russia - Again, deserving on history, concerns over it's readiness, once again an infrastructure to be build from scratch and travel headache's for fans.

Qatar - First WC in the ME. History wise non-existent. Weather and accomodation demands, and AGAIN has to build everything from scratch.

So in the last 4 WCs, none have gone to a country with both deserving history and suitable infrastructure.. They haven't given much consideration to the base swell of support (and talent) from the main countries likely to be competing in it. and not to the country best suited to do it. They've all been political in one way or another and this is the problem.I'm fine with 2, even 3 of these. but 4? No. Not as a fan who will try and go to all of them, and not as a football fan who wants to see the best tournament possible.

I'm all for the idea, but slip in a country with an already concrete infrastructure in between why don't you. Japan was a good idea, and it followed France and preceeded Germany. Even just one of those now would be a God send. Instead we have 4 consecutive WCs that will likely provide some headache's in some aspects. This is the problem.

Qatar is not a footballing nation by any stretch of the imagination, nor is it really a "developing nation"..It's the 2nd wealthest place on earth per capita FFS! If you wanted to give a World Cup to a nation that's never had it try Holland, a country who's players fans and people have contributed to it richly for decades and never hosted it..If you wanted to give it to the ME, why not wait until one of the more prominent Arab states with a proper footballing history came up with a bid? Sammskys melodramatic attempts to paint Qatar as a sort of Billy Elliot/Oliver Twist figure are laughable, a bit misguided and missing the point. They have done little to deserve the most prestigious tournament in the world....Apparently now the world's biggest football tournament deserves to be hosted by anyone who can afford to do it, or hasn't done it before, rather than the places best suited for the best football, best experience for the fans and best conditions for the players, or by those who would do all this AND have a rich history with the sport and competition.....It's not a travelling circus, it's a football tournament.

Russia, whilst deserving in through it's history has also sort of won it not by virtue of being the best place to have it, but by virtue of it being "deserving" sort of forgetting that the reason Eastern Europe hasn't hosted one before isn't because of some darstadly Western conspiracy, but because it's infrastructure and racial tollerance has been well below the standards required for years...It should have to sort these out and deserve it on merit before it's given it surely? Instead of some kind of fast track...

Again, sorry to sound a bit like a top white, but are you going to try and go to all these? Is sammsky? Probably not. I am, and while I love the travelling and the new horizon broadening that goes with it (and I take deep offence at anyone trying to pain me or anyone else as jingoistic for this) I'd like the best place for a good WC somewhere in there as well ...especially since they only roll round every 4 years.

/rant....Off to put the kettle on.

Brilliantly put mate!
 
cue the next Panorama expose. this could get interesting.

I'd love to see Blatter, Platini etc getting caught with their hands in the cookie jar, so to speak, but won't hold my breath for it.
 
On reflection, I think Samm and Rood are probably right. FIFA want to push the world cup out to new frontiers and naturally Russia and Qatar fit that description. Our bid was brilliant but didn't excite FIFA enough. Essentially FIFA wants a legacy, I'm not sure a England WC would've given them one, just as Spain, US, Japan et al wouldn't have'd either. Which is a crying shame for football fans in this country but there you go.
 
Oh they'll be fantastic. Without a doubt. They'll throw so much money at it it'll be like Disneyland meets Vegas meets Dubai with football..and I'll more than likely go (Ifs permitting) but that isn't the point..

Here's the point (IMO)..

Firstly the notion that FIFA is a hugely corrupt and agenda driven organisation (but that's really a given) but mainly the overbearing feeling that the actual base aspects of football and World Cups (the quality of football, the teams actually in it, the fans actually going, the players actually playing etc) are no longer taken into consideration when deciding the who hosts the football World Cup. Which is silly. All those saying "yeah but it's nice they're given a chance' probably aren't fecking going..and certainly aren't fecking playing in it. The World Cup isn't a charity drive, it's a football tournament but Blatter (at face value at least) seems to be trying deliberately to give it to countries who don't seem suitable as a sort of incentive to get football really big there...

And I've got no problem with that philosophy. In essence it's great and I love the fact the WC went to Africa last time, and I think it should definitely go to countries who wouldn't normally see top class football...but in moderation. Not every year. It's disregarding the core of football and the core of the fanbases to be political. And that's without even touching on the idea that a country shouldn't use the WC as an incentive to clean up/modernise their act once they've got it. They should do that AS an incentive to get the WC.

Lets look at the last 4 decided hosts and see what their merits have been..

South Africa - First WC in Africa. Little WC history in the country itself (comparatively) but a deserving one for the continent as a whole. Practically it didn't initially meet criteria though. Little infrastrucure to begin with and concerns over safety, weather, altitude, travel etc. It ended up not being a great WC but it was worthy and in the end a success for the country itself.

Brazil - Deserving on historical merit. Easily. Same concerns over safety, travel etc though, but because of it's long and rich history with football deserves its chance.

Russia - Again, deserving on history, concerns over it's readiness, once again an infrastructure to be build from scratch and travel headache's for fans.

Qatar - First WC in the ME. History wise non-existent. Weather and accomodation demands, and AGAIN has to build everything from scratch.

So in the last 4 WCs, none have gone to a country with both deserving history and suitable infrastructure.. They haven't given much consideration to the base swell of support (and talent) from the main countries likely to be competing in it. and not to the country best suited to do it. They've all been political in one way or another and this is the problem.I'm fine with 2, even 3 of these. but 4? No. Not as a fan who will try and go to all of them, and not as a football fan who wants to see the best tournament possible.

I'm all for the idea, but slip in a country with an already concrete infrastructure in between why don't you. Japan was a good idea, and it followed France and preceeded Germany. Even just one of those now would be a God send. Instead we have 4 consecutive WCs that will likely provide some headache's in some aspects. This is the problem.

Qatar is not a footballing nation by any stretch of the imagination, nor is it really a "developing nation"..It's the 2nd wealthest place on earth per capita FFS! If you wanted to give a World Cup to a nation that's never had it try Holland, a country who's players fans and people have contributed to it richly for decades and never hosted it..If you wanted to give it to the ME, why not wait until one of the more prominent Arab states with a proper footballing history came up with a bid? Sammskys melodramatic attempts to paint Qatar as a sort of Billy Elliot/Oliver Twist figure are laughable, a bit misguided and missing the point. They have done little to deserve the most prestigious tournament in the world....Apparently now the world's biggest football tournament deserves to be hosted by anyone who can afford to do it, or hasn't done it before, rather than the places best suited for the best football, best experience for the fans and best conditions for the players, or by those who would do all this AND have a rich history with the sport and competition.....It's not a travelling circus, it's a football tournament.

Russia, whilst deserving in through it's history has also sort of won it not by virtue of being the best place to have it, but by virtue of it being "deserving" sort of forgetting that the reason Eastern Europe hasn't hosted one before isn't because of some darstadly Western conspiracy, but because it's infrastructure and racial tollerance has been well below the standards required for years...It should have to sort these out and deserve it on merit before it's given it surely? Instead of some kind of fast track...

Again, sorry to sound a bit like a top white, but are you going to try and go to all these? Is sammsky? Probably not. I am, and while I love the travelling and the new horizon broadening that goes with it (and I take deep offence at anyone trying to pain me or anyone else as jingoistic for this) I'd like the best place for a good WC somewhere in there as well ...especially since they only roll round every 4 years.

/rant....Off to put the kettle on.

Great post packed full of opinion as always. Some of it makes snese and I agree with and some I dont.

The biggest point of difference we have is about how to develop interest. The Middle East is football mad and indeed invest many £millions to the likes of SKY for viewing rights. And so they already have huge vested interest in how football have evolved over the years. To put it simply, alot of arab money already props up many clubs in the PL beyond the Manchester Massive.

By hosting the tournament to Qatar in 10 years time is a masterstroke in terms of developing football in the region. For the next 10 years, there will be an amazing anticipation and injection of interest into the game. many millions of new fans will be created and an entire generation of young kids will enter the game dreaming of playing in that tournament. Such a transformation is a closer match to FIFAs stated corporate vision than what would have been achieved by awarding the games to a country that already has a deep fascination with the game.

Englands bid in particular was fundamentally flawed in this aspect. Talks of 'legacy' in the England bid was laughable ..... we already have a very saturated market with massive levels of consumption and interest. Hosting the world cup in England would also serve to enhance the nations ego - it would certainly not enhance the popularity of the game nor improve the infrastructure as both are already of world class standards.

So by awarding it to newer footballing nations who have less well developed footballing infrastructures and capabilities is a laudable thing to do and IMO should be congratulated.

Of course the outdated and deluded elitist and imperialist nature of some Englishmen ( as evidenced throughout this thread: "we invented the game ... its our game!") cannot see any of this and so cry foul.
 
On reflection, I think Samm and Rood are probably right. FIFA want to push the world cup out to new frontiers and naturally Russia and Qatar fit that description. Our bid was brilliant but didn't excite FIFA enough. Essentially FIFA wants a legacy, I'm not sure a England WC would've given them one, just as Spain, US, Japan et al wouldn't have'd either. Which is a crying shame for football fans in this country but there you go.

.. I don't think anyone's debating that that agenda isn't a worthwhile one...But the fact that it's their sole agenda is a shame for all football fans. There was obviously no point in us bidding. Ever. Or anyone else for that matter, and technical merit counts for nothing.
 
How is it selfish to want the World Cup to focus more attention on the countries that are competiting in it or have grand history in it rather than whomever can stump up the decent money?

I think it's more selfish to want to buy your way in without earning it in any capacity. Do you think the ashes should be held in Dubai? or Wimbledon in Flushing Meadows? (bad example that one)

Also I think Oz an the US both had much better, more deserving bids

But neither Oz nor USA filfilled your criteria either so you would still have had the same complaint?

Selfish was probably a bit harsh, but I dont see why a football fan in the Middle East shouldnt have the chance to watch the WC.

For the record I would have favoured Oz over Qatar but they are hardly a footballing hotbed so the issues are the same. Plus when you look at the 2 bids then there a lot of reasons why the Qatari one makes more sense (geography, time zones for tv, size of country etc).
I was very against USA/Japan/Korea bids and in fact I dont think those countries should even have been allowed to apply due to having hosted in recent times.


I don't have much problem with Russia, It's more the straw that broke the camel's back.. but I agree with people saying the whole point of the bidding process is futile if you're just going to give it to someone because "it's their time"...and again the idea that WCs should be used as a fast track/lazy way to clean up your problems...The reason Eastern Europe haven't hosted one before isn't because of some horrible western conspiracy, it's because it's lacked the requirements, safetly and racial tollerence to do so for years.

Again, the World Cup isn't solely a political charity drive. It's a football tournament. The agenda should be 50/50 at most and probably more like 65/35...Right now it's 80/20 political.

At the end I think various factors came to play and it sounded like it was a 50/50 chance for most of the way with England getting the vote based on bid and Russia getting it on politics. Our media made sure that balance was tilted very firmly against us in the final run in.

I agree there are issues about agendas and politics within FIFA and the whole organisation is a sham, but the Russian's still have a strong bid in their own right.

I can understand the disappointment at England missing out, I also hoped we would get it but have been saying for some time that I feared the media had put the final nail in the coffin for our bid. Turns out the positive feeling in past few days was all a load of bollocks as well.
If you look at it then England really missed its chance in 2006 and the blame for that is 100% on our spastic hooligan twats. Even at that time we were favorites until something unrelated to the bid fecked it all up at the last minute.
Always shooting ourselves in the foot one way or the other.
 
2nded.

Sammsky is missing the point with a lot of this - it's not solely because england didnt get it that some people are angered by fifa. It's that the tournament is now given to whoever is least best equipped to put it on so FIFA can spread the game, as it were.

If they are intent on doing that then why let countries like england and spain bid? It's a huge waste of time. Oh, except for the factFIFA loves being pampered and arse licked by politicians, royals and celebrities so they encourage the elaborate process.

If you allow countries to bid then the winner should be whoever makes the best bid and in this case englands bid was the sole bid that got 100% rating for its technical aspects in the race for 2018. If russia wants the world cup then they should put that in place before trying to get it!

Nah mate, its you who is missing the point .... its not about who is the 'best equipped right now', its about who will be the best equipped at the time of the tournament, in Qatar's case, in 10 years time.

Some of Qatar's proposed technology and science is amazing!!! And the legacy that hosts like Russia and Qatar will provide the game of football is far far superior than anything England could give the game.

England has been an amazing contributor to the world of football from its creation all the way through to the development of the Premier League. But I think the contribution it came make to growing the game has maxed out. Russia and Qatar will provide far more new fans to the game than England can over the next 10 years.
 
On reflection, I think Samm and Rood are probably right. FIFA want to push the world cup out to new frontiers and naturally Russia and Qatar fit that description. Our bid was brilliant but didn't excite FIFA enough. Essentially FIFA wants a legacy, I'm not sure a England WC would've given them one, just as Spain, US, Japan et al wouldn't have'd either. Which is a crying shame for football fans in this country but there you go.

No, you're too nice. The whole thing is a joke and despite what Mockers says it IS a travelling circus headed for the most enthusiastic padder of Fifa official's back pocket.

Two votes. Even the Eurovision is less agenda driven.
 
Our bid was brilliant but didn't excite FIFA enough. Essentially FIFA wants a legacy, I'm not sure a England WC would've given them one, just as Spain, US, Japan et al wouldn't have'd either.


I can't get my head them awarding the 2022 Finals at the same time. And where were the Western Europe bids for that one? It's a fecking disgrace that Western Europe, the home and heartland of football will go 20 years without hosting one.
These Fifa cnuts need fecking.