Trizy
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 12,009
Shocking lately and an utter cnut but in a less defensive team he'll bang them in I'd feel.
Ideal Arsenal Striker, mind.
Ideal Arsenal Striker, mind.
Really? It wasn't even the worst performance by a Chelsea striker on the night.Thats one of the worst performances I've ever seen.
I hope a highlights package gets uploaded somewhere
TBF they are about same quality. They are good but not great strikers, level below the really top quality ones. There is no way any of these three would get into team infront of Cole, RVN, Tevez, Rooney, Ronaldo, RVP,... strikers which were first choice for us before. But there really isn't a lot of top quality real strikers around anymore tbf.On the evidence of the season so far, Lukaku is a cut above Morata and Lacazette.
He's done that from very first few minutes he joined EPL, never observed him enough before but that was striking to me - seems like refs no longer buying his cheap tricks.He has this habit of going down too easily and I think soon he will develop a reputation
TBF they are about same quality.
You seem to have a different barometer of what constitutes a bad performance. He came on, linked up well and our buildup play improved with him upfront. Batshauyi may have scored but beyond that he was pathetic, made all the wrong runs and movement and was dispossessed everytime he got it, killing any potential chance of an attack.@Dancfc
Missing two glorious chances, falling over from no contact onto the ball trying to claim a freekick that was given against him because of it and then the penalty debacle.
All within what? 25 minutes?
Its right up there anyway
He's done that from very first few minutes he joined EPL, never observed him enough before but that was striking to me - seems like refs no longer buying his cheap tricks.
Im not saying he was great, far from it, but along way from one of the worst ever and this talk of Lukaku suddenly being better based on it is laughable.
Not really, i have never been keen on him and felt he found his level at Everton. I'd be a lot more worried if you turned Rom into a super sub and made Martial the main striker, that lad has it all and is wasted on the wing.I think the talk of Lukaku being better comes from the fact Lukaku has proven that he can be the main man and bang in goals in this league at a rate that only Harry Kane can better. The fact that you find that laughable when Morata has spent his career as backup would indicate more than a little bias.
Not really, i have never been keen on him and felt he found his level at Everton. I'd be a lot more worried if you turned Rom into a super sub and made Martial the main striker, that lad has it all and is wasted on the wing.
He has always been a confidence player, he is severely lacking it right now.
I agree Lukaku will score goals, but that's not why i didn't want him back. My prediction was whoever signed him would look for an upgrade eventually. You obviously watch United more so are better placed to comment but i always felt Martial is at his devastating best as a striker who drifts wide, cliche as this sounds a bit like Henry.Martial generally plays better from the left. Lukaku will very likely end up with 30 goals in his first season without a single penalty and his overall play has gotten better and better, I reckon he's fitting in nicely and our level is a little above Everton in my humble opinion.
60m? more like 180m if you add the wages.That is okay when you are playing a supporting role to Ronaldo and Benzema. When you're the 60 million pound main man up front it is an issue. Good player though he is.
I agree Lukaku will score goals, but that's not why i didn't want him back. My prediction was whoever signed him would look for an upgrade eventually. You obviously watch United more so are better placed to comment but i always felt Martial is at his devastating best as a striker who drifts wide, cliche as this sounds a bit like Henry.
Has to be the worst Italian at Chelsea since Franck LaBoeuf
Has to be the worst Italian at Chelsea since Franck LaBoeuf
Or Torres?
Or Torres?
I think there is this weird cliché about Lukaku being a bit rubbish outside of scoring loads of goals. I think it comes from his younger days when he was not very coordinated due to growing into his frame and a couple of overused clips of him miscontrolling the ball. His all around game is actually very good and he is fantastic at bringing others into the game.
Martial has played well up front but most of his best performances have come from out wide drifting in. Rashford is better up front than out wide.
TBF they are about same quality. They are good but not great strikers, level below the really top quality ones. There is no way any of these three would get into team infront of Cole, RVN, Tevez, Rooney, Ronaldo, RVP,... strikers which were first choice for us before. But there really isn't a lot of top quality real strikers around anymore tbf.
Torres was Spanish
Are we all just naming Chelsea players who aren't Italian?
Erland Johnson.
Worst Indian poster on RedCafe since @Ramshock.Has to be the worst Italian at Chelsea since Franck LaBoeuf
I think there is this weird cliché about Lukaku being a bit rubbish outside of scoring loads of goals. I think it comes from his younger days when he was not very coordinated due to growing into his frame and a couple of overused clips of him miscontrolling the ball. His all around game is actually very good and he is fantastic at bringing others into the game.
Martial has played well up front but most of his best performances have come from out wide drifting in. Rashford is better up front than out wide.
Thats funny, because scores of your own fans have the same view aswell.Agree about the first paragraph, although you're talking to one of the most biased Chelsea fans on here so he won't understand. Lukaku is crap outside the goals is an opinion sprouted by people who know feck all about football and haven't seen him play for United.
Thats funny, because scores of your own fans have the same view aswell.