Am currently mateYou ever been married mate?
Am currently mateYou ever been married mate?
fecking shameless. The whole thread is disgusting…
fecking shameless. The whole thread is disgusting…
fecking shameless. The whole thread is disgusting…
Not sure why you find that a frustrating attitude? We both agree that ultimately the woman will have the deciding vote. Being included in the conversation is one thing, but in the end there’s one party that should have the final say. No contradiction there.
Because your very first line is you asking how it works for 'the man to have a say', not how it works for the man to have the deciding say.
As I said, I'm very Pro choice and I don't know how everyone else's relationship works but in mine, my wife and I talk through all major life decisions and come to a consensus. It's not just that either of us decides and the other be damned.
I’m going to get stick for this post but oh well.
America opened Pandora’s box by forcing Vaccines and Masks. The democrats fell for it. Now how can they bang on about my body my choice when they were acting like they were against the anti vax people. I know it’s apples and oranges. But by giving the government power to force lockdowns, vaccines, masks, they’ll go on to do more like abortions. What’s next? Uniforms? Length of hair? France have banned hijabs.
It doesn’t matter if vaccines and masks were for the greater good. This power couldn’t have been given to the government. Pandora’s box.
I know it’s apples and oranges.
It’s not comparable to me. But it is to the US Government.How is pregnancy comparable to an infectious disease?
Abortion, in my opinion, is simply wrong. The same as destroying any nascent life is wrong.
The fact that the foetus is not yet a fully-fledged human being is irrelevant. It is life in its most vulnerable form and in its most invioble state (within a womb) being killed.
Yes, there are cases where the life of the mother may be jeopardized by giving birth, but the act of killing foetuses is one that we should not just casually dismiss as a society, nor encourage.
There is a wider issue of rape culture and promiscuity that leads to unwanted pregnancies and to some degree necessitates birth control. Again, it is up to us to fix that. We need, as a society, to stop promoting casual flings and Tinder-dates as being part of who we are as a people. We have to stress the importance and sanctity of settled relationships and building a family.
It's anyone's guess as to why we don't do that anyway, especially when it is to everyone's benefit. We don't encourage people to smoke cigarettes and we limit alcohol advertising, so why don't we advise people, particularly at a young age, to get married and have a family. Instead we genuflect culturally to a kind of degrading hedonism that leaves people broken, mentally damaged, and isolated. Some of these people have to convince themselves, against inevitable doubts, that they were right to abort an unborn child that they had conceived and succoured, a life that relied exclusively on them and survived and existed only because of them.
The level of mental trauma that must exist for doctors and mothers who go through abortions cannot be underestimated.
Abortion, in my opinion, is simply wrong. The same as destroying any nascent life is wrong.
The fact that the foetus is not yet a fully-fledged human being is irrelevant. It is life in its most vulnerable form and in its most invioble state (within a womb) being killed.
Yes, there are cases where the life of the mother may be jeopardized by giving birth, but the act of killing foetuses is one that we should not just casually dismiss as a society, nor encourage.
There is a wider issue of rape culture and promiscuity that leads to unwanted pregnancies and to some degree necessitates birth control. Again, it is up to us to fix that. We need, as a society, to stop promoting casual flings and Tinder-dates as being part of who we are as a people. We have to stress the importance and sanctity of settled relationships and building a family.
It's anyone's guess as to why we don't do that anyway, especially when it is to everyone's benefit. We don't encourage people to smoke cigarettes and we limit alcohol advertising, so why don't we advise people, particularly at a young age, to get married and have a family. Instead we genuflect culturally to a kind of degrading hedonism that leaves people broken, mentally damaged, and isolated. Some of these people have to convince themselves, against inevitable doubts, that they were right to abort an unborn child that they had conceived and succoured, a life that relied exclusively on them and survived and existed only because of them.
The level of mental trauma that must exist for doctors and mothers who go through abortions cannot be underestimated.
I sincerely hope so.I’m going to get stick for this post but oh well.
America opened Pandora’s box by forcing Vaccines and Masks. The democrats fell for it. Now how can they bang on about my body my choice when they were acting like they were against the anti vax people. I know it’s apples and oranges. But by giving the government power to force lockdowns, vaccines, masks, they’ll go on to do more like abortions. What’s next? Uniforms? Length of hair? France have banned hijabs.
It doesn’t matter if vaccines and masks were for the greater good. This power couldn’t have been given to the government. Pandora’s box.
Disgusting take.
Very difficult to get truly accurate numbers but I've seen stats that say approx 40% of rapes occur within families.
It’s not comparable to me. But it is to the US Government.
I’m going to get stick for this post but oh well.
America opened Pandora’s box by forcing Vaccines and Masks. The democrats fell for it. Now how can they bang on about my body my choice when they were acting like they were against the anti vax people. I know it’s apples and oranges. But by giving the government power to force lockdowns, vaccines, masks, they’ll go on to do more like abortions. What’s next? Uniforms? Length of hair? France have banned hijabs.
It doesn’t matter if vaccines and masks were for the greater good. This power couldn’t have been given to the government. Pandora’s box.
Abortion, in my opinion, is simply wrong. The same as destroying any nascent life is wrong.
The fact that the foetus is not yet a fully-fledged human being is irrelevant. It is life in its most vulnerable form and in its most invioble state (within a womb) being killed.
Yes, there are cases where the life of the mother may be jeopardized by giving birth, but the act of killing foetuses is one that we should not just casually dismiss as a society, nor encourage.
There is a wider issue of rape culture and promiscuity that leads to unwanted pregnancies and to some degree necessitates birth control. Again, it is up to us to fix that. We need, as a society, to stop promoting casual flings and Tinder-dates as being part of who we are as a people. We have to stress the importance and sanctity of settled relationships and building a family.
It's anyone's guess as to why we don't do that anyway, especially when it is to everyone's benefit. We don't encourage people to smoke cigarettes and we limit alcohol advertising, so why don't we advise people, particularly at a young age, to get married and have a family. Instead we genuflect culturally to a kind of degrading hedonism that leaves people broken, mentally damaged, and isolated. Some of these people have to convince themselves, against inevitable doubts, that they were right to abort an unborn child that they had conceived and succoured, a life that relied exclusively on them and survived and existed only because of them.
The level of mental trauma that must exist for doctors and mothers who go through abortions cannot be underestimated.
Most likely a higher number since it's not brought to light in most cases.
That is a question for someone much smarter than I.Wouldn't codifying abortion just be shot down by the supreme court? Or is it not possible for the supreme court to shoot down a law codified by the government? I would doubt that.
Oh dear.I’m going to get stick for this post but oh well.
America opened Pandora’s box by forcing Vaccines and Masks. The democrats fell for it. Now how can they bang on about my body my choice when they were acting like they were against the anti vax people. I know it’s apples and oranges. But by giving the government power to force lockdowns, vaccines, masks, they’ll go on to do more like abortions. What’s next? Uniforms? Length of hair? France have banned hijabs.
It doesn’t matter if vaccines and masks were for the greater good. This power couldn’t have been given to the government. Pandora’s box.
Am currently mate
Maybe I should have worded it differently, but I meant having a say in the final decision. I don’t think anybody is saying it’s unreasonable for a man to get to put in his two cents, provided there’s the prerequisite relationship in place.
You'd think the Supreme Court just legalized abortion, judging by that post, instead of effectively banning it in half the country.
Depends on how they are viewed. Morning after pills aren’t abortion pills, but many see a distinction without a difference between the two. A large hospital provider declared they were stopping administering plan b pills throughout their setup, fearing that they were next on the chopping block in Missouri. After rancorous criticism, they began administering them again.Any ideas how this works with morning after pills etc?
I mean in America generally. Would they be something that is supported or accessible or is that seen as a no no?
Any ideas how this works with morning after pills etc?
I mean in America generally. Would they be something that is supported or accessible or is that seen as a no no?
Depends on how they are viewed. Morning after pills aren’t abortion pills, but many see a distinction without a difference between the two. A large hospital provider declared they were stopping administering plan b pills throughout their setup, fearing that they were next on the chopping block in Missouri. After rancorous criticism, they began administering them again.
No doubt the right will try to cast any pill taken after intercourse to be an abortifacient in due time.
That remains to be seen, I think. There are plenty of Republicans who want to get rid of the Supreme Court decision that deals with contraception (Griswold), which I believe was made using the same kinds of privacy arguments that were used for Roe. Right now I don't think they can ban morning after pills, but if they get rid of that one then the states can do whatever they want.
I read that as one of the participants was to say ‘coitus interruptus’ & they’d stop having sex right then & there.Thanks for that. I have no idea on the American thought processes for these things.
About 25-30 years ago I read a report from a place (can't remember the details) that was on about banning the contraceptive pill because it basically causes "abortions" a sort of sperm attached to egg then is aborted (again I forget the terminology). The proposal was to say "coitus interruptus" was the only form of contraceptive allowed. And condoms. No other form allowed. And yeah it was as nuts as it sounds.
It’s stopping anyone from out of a state that has a trigger law in place to come into Montana for a medical abortion via pills.I'm not making much sense of this. They surely can't make it illegal for any of their residents once they're out of state?
It’s stopping anyone from out of a state that has a trigger law in place to come into Montana for a medical abortion via pills.
Potential lawsuits / legal action? It’s obviously out of fear, I just can’t think of anything else than legal action.Yes I understood that. Maybe I didn't word it very well. Why would they do that?
Potential lawsuits / legal action? It’s obviously out of fear, I just can’t think of anything else than legal action.
We’ve seen how important precedents have been recently. I would think the trigger law states wouldn’t give a flying feck.That's what I was getting at. As you say it's likely they're afraid of a legal kickback of some kind. However, the states that ban abortion surely have no jurisdiction over their residents once they're out of state. Wouldn't that set an untenable precedent?