Pogue Mahone
Swiftie Fan Club President
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2006
- Messages
- 135,011
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2021
Valencia went off due to injury. Was stretchered off the pitch after everybody else left the field.
Really? FFS...
Valencia went off due to injury. Was stretchered off the pitch after everybody else left the field.
I thought it was a decent performance - certainly one that renders the fact that we have never tried this before truly bizarre.
We have all witnessed him losing confidence in his ability to beat a man when playing on the wing, and we have all seen that he has many of the attributes needed to play CM, we have all seen him play well there for Ecuador, and we have had a long time with United desperately needing a physical presence in midfield... it is a real mystery.
@Pogue Mahone No he didn't. He's perfectly fine.Valencia went off due to injury. Was stretchered off the pitch after everybody else left the field.
If it was that serious, every journalist would be on the case. THere's absolutely nothing from anyone anywhere on Valencia being injured. You would think that someone would at least tweet about it but no.He definitely didn't walk off the pitch.
Well Feillaini is as much use as a chocolate teapot so his "cameo" wasn't a surprise.I don’t think Fellaini won a tackle after he came on and Mata was a passenger so I would have preferred to see Valencia stay on, he did commit some fouls but he doesn’t have a track record of getting sent off so I think he would have been ok to see the game out, taking Mata off would have been a much better substitution.
I would say the only attributes he has which are needed to play box to box role is his amazing strength and work rate. It was enough for Everton though and he was miles better than as a winger.I've always said he could be a good box 2 box midfielder and got laughed at. He has every attribute needed to play there, apart from a hollywood long ball/killer through ball.
Certainly better there than as a winger though!
I've always said he could be a good box 2 box midfielder and got laughed at. He has every attribute needed to play there, apart from a hollywood long ball/killer through ball.
Certainly better there than as a winger though!
I've always said he could be a good box 2 box midfielder and got laughed at. He has every attribute needed to play there, apart from a hollywood long ball/killer through ball.
Certainly better there than as a winger though!
I would say the only attributes he has which are needed to play box to box role is his amazing strength and work rate. It was enough for Everton though and he was miles better than as a winger.
I couldnt really see him working in that position in any other formation to be honest. Maybe in a 4-3-3 with the right winger being Di Maria Mata or Januzaj cutting in and Tony overlappinglike di maria... He certainly has the energy and pace for it but as we all know, he can't cross at all!
He really doesn't need to cross that much as a CM tbf. I've seen him play central in few formations for Ecuador and he's done well. In the WC too against France he was playing a central role in a 3-5-2 changed to 4-3-3 IIRC and did well before getting sent off for that tackle.
His first touch is pretty good actually on his right and ability to shield the ball and create space for himself which is actually crucial in midfield. His awareness of play around him is decent too.
Don't expect him to do anything that creative in midfield regularly as he doesn't have the passing or shooting range and his crossing has gone to shit too now as well but he'll be a good box to box player who would put himself about, intercept balls and just keep it simple. One few occasions he can carry the ball forward centrally in a Dembele/Wilshere/Toure sort of way too to speed up the attack in transition.
He really doesn't need to cross that much as a CM tbf. I've seen him play central in few formations for Ecuador and he's done well. In the WC too against France he was playing a central role in a 3-5-2 changed to 4-3-3 IIRC and did well before getting sent off for that tackle.
Why shouldn't people praise Valencia's performances? Along with Rafael, he helped us control Everton's left flank and it was only when he went off that they looked better on said flank. It doesn't even start and stop there. He played a part in both goals - for the first goal, he holds off Pienaar which gives Rafael the space to cross the ball for our first goal. And for for our second goal, he used his body well to get past Naismith and before playing the right pass to Di María. Is his performance better than any of Herrera's in the diamond? No, but they don't need to be because as he's already shown, a 6/10 performance is what you you should expect from a squad player.He did good by his standards, but still not good enough.
I'm surprised to see so many people praise him for his performance, he has good workrate and he's strong tactically, but he can't pass or cross and has the creativity of a rock.
Why shouldn't people praise Valencia's performances? Along with Rafael, he helped us control Everton's left flank and it was only when he went off that they looked better on said flank. It doesn't even start and stop there. He played a part in both goals - for the first goal, he holds off Pienaar which gives Rafael the space to cross the ball for our first goal. And for for our second goal, he used his body well to get past Naismith and before playing the right pass to Di María. Is his performance better than any of Herrera's in the diamond? No, but they don't need to be because as he's already shown, a 6/10 performance is what you you should expect from a squad player.
The video isn't even analysis, it's just our two goals against Everton and Valencia contributed to both. I disagree that he did "nothing" for the first goal. That can only be said if you completely dismiss how we constructed our attack. He was near the ball in the build-up to our first goal, he blocked Pienaar from getting back and thus, Rafael had that extra bit of space to cross the ball in. Without that significant contribution, Rafael would have had far less space and he probably wouldn't have crossed the ball in. As for for the second goal, he made the best possible decision and this nonsense about sideways passes being given less importance (due to lack of context) needs to stop.I honestly can't tell if that video is a joke... seriously. His "role" in the first two goals? Granted he made an average sideways pass for the second goal, but the first goal he literally did nothing. He didn't touch the ball, nor was he really anywhere near it.
Fecking hell - Mata's pass to Di Maria was an "average sideways pass" also - it's when and where you make the pass that makes it "key" not just the difficulty level of executing it. The only "hard" pass in the whole game was Di Maria's mid-air reverse flick to falcao. If Valencia doesn't make that pass, ADM never gets the shooting opportunity adn Falcao's doesn't get to turn the shot in...I honestly can't tell if that video is a joke... seriously. His "role" in the first two goals? Granted he made an average sideways pass for the second goal, but the first goal he literally did nothing. He didn't touch the ball, nor was he really anywhere near it.
Fecking hell - Mata's pass to Di Maria was an "average sideways pass" also - it's when and where you make the pass that makes it "key" not just the difficulty level of executing it. The only "hard" pass in the whole game was Di Maria's mid-air reverse flick to falcao. If Valencia doesn't make that pass, ADM never gets the shooting opportunity adn Falcao's doesn't get to turn the shot in...
Haters are just so funny - anything at all will be used against the object of hate!![]()
I honestly can't tell if that video is a joke... seriously. His "role" in the first two goals? Granted he made an average sideways pass for the second goal, but the first goal he literally did nothing. He didn't touch the ball, nor was he really anywhere near it.
I think it summed up your post quite well.Oh. Well that wins that then. Well played.
I think it summed up your post quite well.
This thread was titled "performances" in an extremely sarcastic manner up until a week ago because it was universally understood that Valencia simply wasn't good any more.
Forgive me for maintaining that same sentiment despite one slightly above average performance by his standards, against a team that is barely above relegation thus far.
Had Everton tied it up or even won, which they were entitled to (thanks De Gea), this thread would have read very differently after the match.
I might seem fickle, but at least I don't bounce around from one bandwagon of "he's shit" to "wow, we now have an excellent player on our hands" after every match, like many of us are prone to.