I don't think we'll get him, but I can't believe that report doesn't give a reason as to why its off.
Arturo Vidal
- Thread starter The Don
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) is joined by CEO Duncan Drasdo and Financial Director Andy Green from the Manchester United Supporters Trust for a special episode on all things behind the scenes at Old Trafford including a brief history of MUST and their aims today, views on INEOS and Sir Jim Ratcliffe so far, and the Old Trafford regeneration.
- Status
That DM story says nothing, and even says what the player has been saying all along, about sorting his future after his holiday. I doubt anything has changed.
Daily Mail?
Then it must be true.
Then it must be true.
Imagine after all this we do actually sign de Jong.
Would be satisfied with that.
Why do we need Vidal? We've already signed Toni Kroos.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...d-Trafford-boss-sets-sights-Arjen-Robben.html
Seriously, though, worst source ever. Daily Mail break no news. Absolute horrendous paper just throwing stuff out there to create hits for their free online paper. Surprised they haven't claimed Vidal was one of the lads getting his cock sucked in Magaluf the other week.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...d-Trafford-boss-sets-sights-Arjen-Robben.html
Seriously, though, worst source ever. Daily Mail break no news. Absolute horrendous paper just throwing stuff out there to create hits for their free online paper. Surprised they haven't claimed Vidal was one of the lads getting his cock sucked in Magaluf the other week.
MEN did the exact same.
I may shed a tear or two
Then we could have the Fellaini - De Jong dream team in midfield.
Let's be honest. What has happened here:
Twitter bollocks has slowly grown to the heights of today and yesterday where it is mental. Daily Mail have decided to get views by throwing a spanner in the works.
The reality is who the feck knows whether we are in for Vidal.
Twitter bollocks has slowly grown to the heights of today and yesterday where it is mental. Daily Mail have decided to get views by throwing a spanner in the works.
The reality is who the feck knows whether we are in for Vidal.
I wasn't being serious. It was 1/6 earlier. They suspended betting yesterday.
I wasn't being serious.
Nope, you'll still be a virgin tomorrow.
Cocks in lads. Let's go home.
They might know something seeing as they've wanted to be the first to get the scoop so didn't even finish the article.
'More to follow...'
It might not end well.
'More to follow...'
It might not end well.
Ok, cheers. I'm willing to believe that's how the things stand.
ArturOFF 
I know we have been blacklisting some twittards, but really, nothing of value would be lost if we do the same with Daily Mail.
Their article is composed of "the deal is off" and wall of pictures and videos.
Their article is composed of "the deal is off" and wall of pictures and videos.
Oh look we have a funny guy right here!
ArturOFF?
This article with more to follow will be exactly the same till tomorrow.
The article is click-bait. The very same journo earlier reported it was on.
Article updated; but still not reasons, just added the quotes form Vidal yesterday.
I know you weren't! I was just talking in general.
You saw what De Jong showcased at he World Cup.
Did I miss any Olly/Jeston gifs?
That sounds pretty conclusive in fairness
If people are believing the Daily Mail with this story then they need their heads checked.
When I see an article from the Daily Mail saying we've agreed a deal I think it's bullshit.
When I see an article from the Daily Mail saying it's off, I panic.
I'd say I'm going to stop reading their click bait as it's lose lose, but it'd be a lie
When I see an article from the Daily Mail saying it's off, I panic.
I'd say I'm going to stop reading their click bait as it's lose lose, but it'd be a lie
So they wrote the first article on pure twitter rumours. Then seen what Ducker (normally very good on United transfers) said on the matter, back tracked and created that pile of crap article. It just screams lazy journalism to me.
Simon Jones certainly churns out the articles.
It's still on. Screw the Mail.
From the mail? Say it ain't so.
When I see an article from the Daily Mail saying we've agreed a deal I think it's bullshit.
When I see an article from the Daily Mail saying it's off, I panic.
I'd say I'm going to stop reading their click bait as it's lose lose, but it'd be a lie
The fact that everyone on Twitter have been in agreement that the deal is edging closer, then the Mail have suddenly said its off, it is a concern IMO.
The guy is sticking his neck on the line, until he gives us his reasons behind the article I'd stay on the fence.
Would be funny if the Vidal transfer gets confirmed tonight.
Woody sealing the deals but not signing players.. It was fun while it lasted.
It ain't so my friend.
United fans on Twitter saying ''f*ck him'' already 
You know I actually hate the transfer window sometimes.
You know I actually hate the transfer window sometimes.
What? Have you read it? It says absolutely nothing. It's almost the same as their article earlier, by the same writer, saying it's on. Right down to the pictures. They've just changed the headline and added in "the deal is off the table". It even has the same bits about him deciding his future when he comes back from holiday.
Now, I'm not saying it'll happen, but that article is about as far from conclusive as it gets.
You weren't being serious, were you?
One guy writes two articles saying the complete opposite, that way whatever happens he can say he got it right, and the other was just bad information given to him.
- Status