I think its all true. And none of these claims are rocket science either. However rather than it being about power politics, I think that both SAF and Woodward all have the clubs best interest at heart, they simply have different opinions.
The key thing though that pisses me off is SAF still wanting influence. If he did, he should be transparent and have a proper footballing role at the club. But he does not, he is a marketing tool. And so he is repeating all the same mistakes we made with Busby.
Power is never given nor a right no matter what ones job title might be: Power has to be taken. And Woodward has to take a risk if he wants to assert his power.
That risk must be to immediately sack LVG and in his place hire Mourinho. If Giggs leaves, he leaves.n In doing so, he will also cut SAF and his cronies at the knee's.
Appointing Giggs is a bigger risk to his own political position. If Giggs fails, Woodward gets the sack. If Giggs does well, the credit and power goes to SAF, so Woodward effectively also becomes simply a puppet.
This is a big boys business, and people like Woodward are handsomely padi to deal with such organisational dynamics and tough choices. And Woodward is failing on that count right now.